2 visits to Dinas Bran and here are the results.
Comments most welcome
1.
2.
3.
Thanks for looking
Andy
slartibardfast Goldmember  1,000 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Shropshire England More info | Jul 27, 2011 06:02 | #1 2 visits to Dinas Bran and here are the results. 2. 3. Thanks for looking Andy www.three6t.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
digidiva Goldmember  2,002 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Kent, UK More info | Jul 27, 2011 08:20 | #2 I would absolutely love to see these with more natural looking processing. BUYING A CANON DOESN'T MAKE YOU A PHOTOGRAPHER, IT MAKES YOU A CANON OWNER.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Numenorean Cream of the Crop 5,013 posts Likes: 28 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Jul 27, 2011 08:34 | #3 |
paul-t Goldmember 1,871 posts Joined Oct 2007 Location: The deep south, that's the deep south of England. More info | Jul 27, 2011 08:51 | #4 Have to agree ott for me to, would like to see them straight or with less hdr.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ianmarsh Senior Member 255 posts Joined Mar 2009 Location: London, UK More info | Jul 27, 2011 11:49 | #5 Fantastic pictures, especially the last one (is it a bit dark or is that my laptop monitor?). I'd crop a slice off the bottom of the second one as the bright foreground is distracting, and I would personally tone down the HDR in the first two for web use. But I think all three would look great printed large. X-pro1, X-E1 | 14/1.4 | 18/2 | 35/1.4 | 18-55/2.8-4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paul3221 Goldmember  2,468 posts Likes: 153 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Phoenix, AZ More info | Jul 27, 2011 17:41 | #6 I love the colors on the last two. If you back off the HDR a bit, I think they'd be real winners. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
irishman Goldmember  4,098 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Scottsdale, AZ More info | Jul 27, 2011 18:40 | #7 I think if you would sharpen them in post it would make them so much better. Just too soft. That third one is awesome with just a bit of work. 6D, G9, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 15mm Fisheye, Sigma 50 2.8 macro, Nikon 14-24G 2.8, Canon 16-35 2.8 II, Canon 24-105 f/4 IS, Canon 70-200 2.8 IS, tripod, lights, other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
plasticmotif Goldmember  3,174 posts Likes: 2 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Tennessee More info | Jul 27, 2011 20:15 | #8 third one is amazing composition-wise, the HDR attempt needs some work. Mac P.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
slartibardfast THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,000 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jul 2007 Location: Shropshire England More info | Aug 01, 2011 03:21 | #9 Thanks for your comments, I will have to go and play a little more on them www.three6t.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdizzle Darth Noink  69,419 posts Likes: 65 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Harvesting Nano crystals More info | Aug 01, 2011 03:29 | #10 I have to agree with the others. The compositions are good but, the HDR sort of kills it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
steely Senior Member  294 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2008 Location: melbourne australia More info | Aug 01, 2011 04:15 | #11 jdizzle wrote in post #12856100  I have to agree with the others. The compositions are good but, the HDR sort of kills it. +1 with this steely
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 903 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
