Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 27 Jul 2011 (Wednesday) 17:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon EF 8-15 f/4L Fisheye distortion

 
Stone ­ 13
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
Jul 27, 2011 17:20 |  #1

Canon Rumors states that this lens has started shipping. I have almost zero experience with fisheye lenses, but this seems like the opportunity to get ultra, ultra wide on a FF body which will more than likely be my next purchase. My question is can the fisheye effect be completely removed in LR3 or CS5 i.e. can a shot taken at 8mm be completely straightened in PP with no remaining fisheye "distortion" of the image or can it only be partially corrected?


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
23,395 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 578
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jul 27, 2011 17:43 |  #2

Stone 13 wrote in post #12833627 (external link)
Canon Rumors states that this lens has started shipping. I have almost zero experience with fisheye lenses, but this seems like the opportunity to get ultra, ultra wide on a FF body which will more than likely be my next purchase. My question is can the fisheye effect be completely removed in LR3 or CS5 i.e. can a shot taken at 8mm be completely straightened in PP with no remaining fisheye "distortion" of the image or can it only be partially corrected?

no way fully corrected.

ed


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4 x2, 16-35L F4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS II, 100-400L II, 14L II, sigma 15 FE, sigma 28 f1.4 art, tc 1.4 III, 430exII, gitzo 3542L + markins Q20, gitzo GT 1545T + markins Q3T, gitzo GM4562

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stone ­ 13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
Jul 27, 2011 17:57 |  #3

thanks Ed


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
Jul 29, 2011 13:38 |  #4

From the pictures with this lens and a 5D Mark II it is very wide. http://vimeo.com/27028​766 (external link)

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Jul 29, 2011 23:09 |  #5

Just IMHO, you could spend $1500 in better ways that a very specialized lens like the fisheye. Personally I would look at one of the cheaper sigma fisheye lenses to see if you like it. It you really love the effect, think about upgrading.

My fisheye is easily my least used lens. It's great for when I need the effect, but that's not very often.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 870
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jul 29, 2011 23:14 |  #6

Every fisheye can be de-fished in software, but with extreme fisheyes like 8mm on FF the corrected image will be much less wide (probably something like 12mm, or even more), and the edges will have extremely bad quality (very soft).


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Jul 29, 2011 23:29 |  #7

Look for one of the inexpensive manual focus fisheyes and experiment with that before sinking a lot of money into an FE lens. Depth of field is so deep, you hardly need to focus. But it's a very specialized lens... I had one for years in another system and probably used it a couple dozen times at most.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stone ­ 13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
Jul 30, 2011 02:56 |  #8

thanks guys, I'm looking at FF and ultra wide angle options since I'm enjoying landscape shooting a lot more than I thought I would. From my research, it seems that 14mm is about as wide as it gets in Canon EF mount. I've been thinking about the upcoming Sigma 12-24 II but it seems to be vaporware status at this point. I probably wouldn't take advantage of the fish eye effect very often so maybe my thoughts on the 8-15 were a bit premature. I just have a desire to get as wide as possible to avoid stitching images, and since I have a body upgrade in my future, EF-S lenses are out of consideration.....


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Jul 30, 2011 08:53 |  #9

For the price of this lens you could probably pick up a used original 5D and a used 17-40L and have a very capable and versatile setup for landscape photography.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jul 30, 2011 09:00 |  #10

As a fish-eye fanatic and owner of 2 FE's I use A LOT, I'm definitely waiting for the 8-15/4L. What I'll say is, if you're not sure, then just get yourself a MC Peleng off ebay for $300 and give it a try. The Peleng will be the same field projection as the 8-15/4L, its a 8mm f/3.5 MF lens, its very sharp and works great. If the look aint your bag you just saved $1200+.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase |  (external link)flickr (external link)
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nureality
Goldmember
3,611 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2008
     
Jul 30, 2011 09:03 |  #11

If you're looking for a fisheye so you can go "wider" than a rectilinear lens for Landscape photography... lemme stop you right there. You won't be happy. The distortion of a fisheye is what makes it interesting, as you go out towards the edges, the resolution and sharpness falls off dramatically. If you were to defish, the result would be a much softer image outside of the center. Thats not what you're looking for... you're looking for "edge-to-edge" sharpness and you just won't find that in a defished FE shot.


Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
Gear List | PBase |  (external link)flickr (external link)
Lots of Fun, Lots of Laughs, Happy Trigger Finger!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LongDraw
Member
152 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 30, 2011 16:10 as a reply to  @ nureality's post |  #12

At 8mm with a FF camera it will take an image as if you are peering through the peephole of your front door

Unless you own a crop and a FF and want a lens that will give you the fisheye effect with both bodies I don't see the reason to own this.

I have the Sigma 15mm FE and it is a wonderful lens, less than half the cost of the new canon




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Madweasel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,224 posts
Likes: 61
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Fareham, UK
     
Jul 30, 2011 17:39 |  #13

LongDraw wrote in post #12849243 (external link)
At 8mm with a FF camera it will take an image as if you are peering through the peephole of your front door

Unless you own a crop and a FF and want a lens that will give you the fisheye effect with both bodies I don't see the reason to own this...

That is one reason, but there is a use (for some people) for a circular-field fisheye, which is what the 8mm end gives you on FF. Therefore as well as providing for fisheye effects on different formats, for FF you also get two fisheye lenses; 8mm and 15mm. I do admit though that circular-field fisheyes are particularly specialised, even more than the rectangular-format variety. They were originally designed for scientific uses, such as taking a single shot to show the whole sky.


Mark.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stone ­ 13
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,690 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Huntersville, NC
     
Jul 30, 2011 19:30 |  #14

Very interesting stuff guys, once again I've been enlightened on POTN. :)


Ken
Fujifilm X100T | 5D III gripped |35L | 24-70 2.8L II | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.8 | 430 EX II | Yongnuo YN-568EX | Billingham 445 | Think Tank UD 60 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikesupremedunk
Goldmember
Avatar
1,131 posts
Joined Feb 2011
Location: ny
     
Jul 31, 2011 00:57 |  #15

i want to get a FE lens but this probably isn't the best choice considering its price and how much it gets used. would def like to check it out though, what an interesting lens.


| Andrew | 5D Mark II | EOS-M | Canon 17-40mm f 4 L | Canon 35mm f 1.4 L | Canon 100mm f 2.8 L Macro | Canon 70-200mm f 4 L IS | Canon EF-M 22mm f 2.0 | Speedlite 430EX II|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,959 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Canon EF 8-15 f/4L Fisheye distortion
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1432 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.