Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 23 Oct 2005 (Sunday) 04:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Pretty girls*

 
Salleke
Goldmember
2,201 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Belgium
     
Oct 24, 2005 02:33 as a reply to  @ post 868011 |  #16

Nice job and # 2 I like the most. The hands are cut off but maybe you cropped out? Good luck.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pez13
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
13 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 24, 2005 04:16 |  #17

I'm with fried tempeh!!! four is beautiful




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
berto
Senior Member
Avatar
725 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Guam
     
Oct 24, 2005 06:14 |  #18

ohh my!! these women are beautiful and you captured them greatly! same critique with number 3, the palm tree leaves from behind their heads.
besides a tighter crop on #3. i love all of them. great work, Berrylish!


Canon 40D, 50Dx2, e-pl1, 580ex, 580ex2 with special attachment...me.
list of equipment: camera. memory card. lens. camera strap. camera bag. tripod, etc...
http://flickr.com/phot​os/bert671 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Oct 24, 2005 06:33 |  #19

I like #2 the best. I think they all need to be a bit sharper/clearer. If so I might like #4 better :)

Keep at it!

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pixel9ine
Senior Member
Avatar
861 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
     
Oct 24, 2005 07:36 as a reply to  @ kenyc's post |  #20

kenyc wrote:
I think they all need to be a bit sharper/clearer.

Thank goodness for this post; I thought I was losing my eyesight!

I also noticed that some of the shots, esp. 3 & 4, are slightly OOF. Other than that, I have to agree that #2 and 4 are simply outstanding.

Great work!


Andre B :: gearlist
www.pixel9ineexternal link.com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
berrylish
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
791 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Oct 24, 2005 10:46 |  #21

Thanks for the comments and criticism all! I never notice things sticking out of people's heads when I'm taking the pictures :o . #2...I didn't noticed that I cut her fingers when I took the pic either hehehe. I have another shot like that but unfortunately her eyes are closed :cry: .

I think they go out of focus when I resize them. Is there a way to resize them and have them be sharp instead of using unsharp mask after I resize them?


5.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

6.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

7.
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Canon 20D
5D Mark II
50mm/1.4
70-200mm/2.8
580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
waldograce
Goldmember
1,680 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Bristol, VA
     
Oct 24, 2005 22:43 |  #22

I really like #4.
The white blouse really sets off her hair and skin.
Nice DOF and choice of background too.


I can't create beauty with my camera, I can only capture it.
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
berrylish
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
791 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Oct 24, 2005 23:04 |  #23

thanks waldograce


Canon 20D
5D Mark II
50mm/1.4
70-200mm/2.8
580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImagineTNT
Goldmember
Avatar
1,330 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: San Diego
     
Oct 25, 2005 18:54 |  #24

BTW, where'd you take those shots?


C&C always appreciated for my posts :)
Celebration Packages [www.celebrationpackage​s.com (external link)]
Blog [blog.celebrationpackag​es.com (external link)]
Lightroom Tutorials [blog.celebrationpackag​es.com (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
berrylish
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
791 posts
Joined May 2005
     
Oct 25, 2005 19:56 as a reply to  @ ImagineTNT's post |  #25

ImagineTNT wrote:
BTW, where'd you take those shots?

I took these at SDSU.


Canon 20D
5D Mark II
50mm/1.4
70-200mm/2.8
580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DSMITH131
Senior Member
Avatar
850 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Lexington NC
     
Oct 25, 2005 19:56 |  #26

yea what everyone else said


Daniel W. Smith Photography (external link)
Mayhem (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ImagineTNT
Goldmember
Avatar
1,330 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: San Diego
     
Oct 25, 2005 20:13 as a reply to  @ berrylish's post |  #27

berrylish wrote:
I think they go out of focus when I resize them. Is there a way to resize them and have them be sharp instead of using unsharp mask after I resize them?

Yes, there's a few non-destructive ways to apply unsharp mask so resizing them won't matter. Some of them are in the latest issue of Digital Photographer (the Sports edition). I'm sure someone here knows of some online links too.


C&C always appreciated for my posts :)
Celebration Packages [www.celebrationpackage​s.com (external link)]
Blog [blog.celebrationpackag​es.com (external link)]
Lightroom Tutorials [blog.celebrationpackag​es.com (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,816 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 373
Joined May 2005
Location: Denver, CO
     
Oct 25, 2005 20:43 |  #28

You should always wait til the last thing to apply the usm.

KAC


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Page (external link) - Art Print Gallery (external link) - Blog (external link)
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Devil
Member
Avatar
70 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
     
Oct 29, 2005 10:09 |  #29

Great shots !

Just have a question though. In photo 3, I notice you took the pic at 1/1000 with iso 400. Was there any reason why you chose to take this at such a quick speed and keep the iso at 400 as opposed to dropping it down to iso 100/200 and shooting at 1/250 or 1/500 etc ? .. or was this unintentional ?

I'm pretty new to this so I'm still trying to get my head around the whole exposure settings.


Thanks !


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HJMinard
Goldmember
Avatar
2,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Port Huron, Michigan, U.S.A.
     
Oct 29, 2005 11:21 |  #30

Pretty girls, indeed. I don't like the background in #1/5, but the others are nicely done.


~ Jay ~
Canon EOS 20D ... lenses and stuff
Without the Way, there is no going; Without the Truth, there is no knowing; Without the Life, there is no living. <><
Help remove children from poverty: Compassion (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,957 views & 0 likes for this thread, 34 members have posted to it.
Pretty girls*
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2779 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.