Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 01 Aug 2011 (Monday) 08:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

You just got to wonder

 
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Aug 04, 2011 09:29 |  #46

Why are we judging people that we've had no interaction with whatsoever?


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scobols
Goldmember
Avatar
1,363 posts
Gallery: 139 photos
Likes: 628
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Tarpon Springs, FL
     
Aug 04, 2011 10:34 |  #47

cdifoto wrote in post #12875911 (external link)
Why are we judging people that we've had no interaction with whatsoever?

We all do it. Sometimes we keep it to ourselves, other times we don't.

I'm not saying it's right or wrong, just that we all do it.


www.scottbolster.com (external link)
facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,786 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16886
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Aug 04, 2011 11:27 |  #48

A little off topic but I dod not want to start another thread.

That is interesting. I was shot a car show a few weekends ago. Out of nine photographers 4 used dome style diffusers. Huge convection centre with high ceilings with no where to bounce off except maybe the dark concrete floor, another car or kiosk. 2 out of 4 had no caps on the top of the diffusers. Not that it would that have made much of a difference expect for saving some battery power but at least they thought of it. I was judging.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_48
Goldmember
Avatar
2,068 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Brookfield, MA
     
Aug 05, 2011 08:30 |  #49

After reading this entire post I went back and reread the first post. Can the OP say for absolutely sure that the wedding photographer and presumed assistants were actually paid "pros" to shoot the wedding? It is entirely possible that they simply may have been guests or friends that got some shots in lieu of having a real paid photographer. I do realize there are paid photographers out there that don't have the skills to competently shoot an event and maybe what the OP saw was exactly this, but occasionally a few Uncle Joe's and Aunt Sally's can present themselves in an outwardly way that they could be mistaken for the official photographer.


Megapixels and high ISO are a digital photographers heroin. Once you have a little, you just want more and more. It doesn't stop until your bank account is run dry.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,487 views & 0 likes for this thread, 22 members have posted to it.
You just got to wonder
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2135 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.