Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 04 Aug 2011 (Thursday) 08:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Format vs Erase Photos

 
ktownhero
Senior Member
313 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2011
     
Aug 04, 2011 10:02 |  #16

tkadrum wrote in post #12875748 (external link)
Just think of a HD.
The reason why we de-fragment our HD every now and then is because the reader is trying to read data, and if too many missing files it would slow down the process.

Flash memory and hard drives are two totally different animals. And, even so, defragmenting a hard drive in this day and age isn't nearly as big of a deal as it used to be, due to improvements in file systems and HD technology. In fact, I can't remember the last time I "defragged" a hard drive.

Formatting your card every time is complete overkill; though there's nothing wrong with it if that's what you prefer. I read a post once that tried to claim that using "erase images" somehow makes your card less stable, but that's absolutely rubbish. Erase images is perfectly fine and works much faster, and that's why it is there. The proper use for formatting is for when you stick a card into your camera only to find it is running an incompatible file system.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Aug 04, 2011 10:27 |  #17

It used to be common wisdom that if you were using a memory card in a different camera, that you should format it in that particular camera before that use. Since I am using various cards in five different bodies, my preferred procedure is to simply format each time a card goes into a camera for use. Quick and easy and at least I know it was formatted by that body.

In all the years of using various brands of CF cards, I have only had one "go bad". A several year old sandisk started giving me trouble. It would write several files okay, and then it would throw an error, and one or more of the files would be corrupted. It did this in two different bodies, so it got tossed in the trash.

As far as wearing out a memory card, I think at least for me, I'm more likely to retire a card because "it is old, and relatively small capacity" before I actually wear it out. Hey....I've got a 16 meg CF card in the other room there....! Still works....just doesn't hold much !


regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Unregistered.Coward
Senior Member
Avatar
884 posts
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Looking thru the viewfinder
     
Aug 04, 2011 11:02 |  #18

george m w wrote in post #12876267 (external link)
It used to be common wisdom that if you were using a memory card in a different camera, that you should format it in that particular camera before that use.

FAT32 is just that, FAT32. A card formatted in you computer is capable of being read and written to in camera which also utilizes FAT32 and vice versa. Formatting in camera does not improve the quality of the process nor imbibe the card with some mystical qualities.


....the best camera is the one you have on you at the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdpence
Senior Member
584 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
     
Aug 04, 2011 11:07 |  #19

I always format...that's just the way I was taught.


Jeremy
Engineer by day...Amateur Photographer whenever I can find time for it
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=591727

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Aug 04, 2011 11:43 |  #20

FAT32 is just that, FAT32. A card formatted in you computer is capable of being read and written to in camera which also utilizes FAT32 and vice versa. Formatting in camera does not improve the quality of the process nor imbibe the card with some mystical qualities.

I agree with you in principle. And that is why I worded it, "It used to be common wisdom...."
As we know, all to often....wisdom is sometimes not too common, nor is it always correct. :D;)
However, for whatever it's worth, my method seems to have worked for me. That's not to say that it might not have worked equally well had I simply done a FAT32 format in the PC each time. The method of formatting in camera was told to me by a Canon USA sales rep at a workshop I was attending. I have no idea what his level of technical expertise was.

Edit, formatting in camera is also really quick, and it has me making a quick look see at my other settings at the same time ( like making sure I'm set to RAW, which card I'm writing to, etc ), so I like the repeatability of the procedure. As Forrest would say, "one less thing to worry about..."


regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 04, 2011 11:45 |  #21

I always format in camera.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Irfan
Member
131 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Columbus, OH
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:01 |  #22

n0w0rries wrote in post #12875943 (external link)
I would imagine that formatting would cause your flash memory to wear out faster, since you're probably writing to empty sectors. Of course would it wear out noticeably faster? Probably not.

Flash does not behave the same as magnetic disk hard drives. Flash can only be written to so many times. If you fill up 25% of your flash storage (1-25% is photos/video), and then you erase it, and then you fill it up to 25%, the data would be sitting on 26-51% of the storage. That's why you can recover files longer on a flash drive. They call it wear leveling.

So I would imagine that if you erase your 25%, it's going to touch that 25% of storage and say "flag erased". If you format, it's going to touch 100% of the storage and say "format". Unless you're doing this 1000 times a day though, you probably won't see much difference in how long your flash lasts.


its just labeling the sectors, its not actually writing anything to that space/old-data unless you're doing a low-level format, so it really wouldnt be any additional wear/tear.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Osa713
Goldmember
Avatar
1,537 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 1228
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:05 |  #23

CameraMan wrote in post #12876735 (external link)
I always format in camera.

Same here. Feels like a clean slate lol


LIGHT>LENS>BODY

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:06 |  #24

I format unless it's my 16GB card which won't format properly in my camera. Then I just erase them.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:12 |  #25

Sounds like you need a new card. All cards should format with no problems in camera.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dank ­ ink
Senior Member
383 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Ventura County, So Cal
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:14 |  #26

I format as well




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:17 |  #27

I format unless it's my 16GB card which won't format properly in my camera. Then I just erase them.

What camera ? Some of the older offerings need to have the most current firmware to correctly support larger capacity cards.


regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:18 |  #28

tkadrum wrote in post #12875748 (external link)
Just think of a HD.
The reason why we de-fragment our HD every now and then is because the reader is trying to read data, and if too many missing files it would slow down the process.

That has nothing to do with defragmenting a hard drive.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Numenorean
Cream of the Crop
5,013 posts
Likes: 28
Joined Feb 2011
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:19 |  #29

george m w wrote in post #12876919 (external link)
What camera ? Some of the older offerings need to have the most current firmware to correctly support larger capacity cards.

40D

It's not broke, so I'm not going to fix it until it is by changing firmware.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 04, 2011 12:25 |  #30

My 16 GB card formats fine in my 40D.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,310 views & 0 likes for this thread, 45 members have posted to it.
Format vs Erase Photos
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1585 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.