Thanks for the great review. Question: Will this fit under the seat in an airplane?
Jun 14, 2012 09:29 | #76 Thanks for the great review. Question: Will this fit under the seat in an airplane? Karen Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2012 09:41 | #77 repete7 wrote in post #14577951 Thanks for the great review. Question: Will this fit under the seat in an airplane? yes it will. 737 last summer. and thx BAG Reviews, master list!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 14, 2012 09:48 | #78 Cool. Thanks for the quick reply! Karen Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DaveG0 Hatchling 1 post Joined Aug 2012 More info | Awesome review! I read it, then went out to buy the bag. Took it hiking this Monday with my gear (Canon T2i w/ 15-85 mounted with hood + 70-300). The bag is indeed very practical, fits everything nicely and provides easy access.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I got the bag, been using it a few weeks, wanted to share my experience. I do like the bag, but it has some flaws. Karen Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 23, 2012 18:10 | #81 good points. I've put a few small bags into the upper chamber, think "pencil case" size. this allows me to get to things that I need in the upper area, without having to hunt around too much or even worse, go to the bottom of the sack like you mentioned. if they separated the two chambers, it would keep me from sliding long items in there, so I guess it's a necessary evil. BAG Reviews, master list!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bms259 Senior Member 425 posts Likes: 7 Joined Sep 2012 More info | Sep 22, 2012 21:30 | #82 I'm looking at this bag, as a minimalist option for my day-to-day "essential" photo gear, plus whatever else the day might need. This style of bag works well for my needs, but I'm concerned it's a little small.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ninhja Senior Member 867 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Southern California More info | Sep 22, 2012 21:57 | #83 bms259 wrote in post #15029706 I'm looking at this bag, as a minimalist option for my day-to-day "essential" photo gear, plus whatever else the day might need. This style of bag works well for my needs, but I'm concerned it's a little small. I'll be using a 7D with attached 17-55 + 50 1.4 + 70-200 2.8. Would all this fit in the camera compartment? Or would I need to get a lens case for the 70-200 or 50m and use it in the main compartment? you won't be able to fit all 3 lenses in the camera compartment. you'll be able to fit the 70-200 in the camera compartment unattached. you can then fit the 7D + 17-55 OR 50mm attached. the remaining lens will have to be in the main compartment. You could opt to put the 70-200 in the main compartment as well if you want.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bms259 Senior Member 425 posts Likes: 7 Joined Sep 2012 More info | Sep 23, 2012 06:49 | #84 Hmm...Anyone know of a similar bag that's just a little bit bigger, to fit the 7D+50 f1.4+70-200 in the compartment?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
daveyboi Senior Member 652 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Stockton, CA More info | Sep 23, 2012 11:43 | #85 repete7 wrote in post #14896400 The bag did a decent job in distributing weight, although I felt a little out of balance with a tripod. I carried the tripod inside the bag on the side opposite the camera compartment. What I didn't like: No dedicated place for a tripod. There should be laces across the back so I can attach a tripod to the center back of the pack. Even my hydration pack from Wal-Mart has these and it works fine for a tripod. Everything balances well. Have you tried securing the tripod like this? 5D Mark II // 17-40L SOLD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stmichael Member 48 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Mitcham, Surrey More info | Anyone who owns this bag know if it will fit a Canon 5D Mark III with 17-40 lens attached and with a 70-200 f4L IS lens in the lens space next to the camera?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jdoug Hatchling 9 posts Joined Apr 2013 Location: SoFla More info | May 23, 2013 08:50 | #87 repete7 wrote in post #14896400 The pack is really hot. The molded back doesn't help at all. I wish they had done something like Osprey's mesh spacer, so the pack doesn't actually touch your back. I'm seriously considering this bag and do most of my hiking in warm/hot weather. Can anyone else comment on the point above? I really hate Sweaty Back Syndrome. J Doug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 23, 2013 10:26 | #88 I've owned some clik bags and this LP bag seems to be easier to use. BAG Reviews, master list!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Petersman Member 148 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 Location: USA / Germany More info | May 26, 2013 11:25 | #89 jdoug wrote in post #15959546 I'm seriously considering this bag and do most of my hiking in warm/hot weather. Can anyone else comment on the point above? I really hate Sweaty Back Syndrome. ![]() I'm just back from a city trip to Asia, and the humidity was insane .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thegrandpoohbah Senior Member 327 posts Likes: 33 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Fort Nelson, British Columbia, Canada More info | May 26, 2013 12:17 | #90 jdoug wrote in post #15959546 I'm seriously considering this bag and do most of my hiking in warm/hot weather. Can anyone else comment on the point above? I really hate Sweaty Back Syndrome. ![]() You should take a look at the Lowepro Flipside Sport AW Canon EOS 6D | Canon Powershot S95 w/ WP-DC38 | Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM | Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 1.4X | Canon Extender EF 2X III | Canon Speedlite 580EX II | Sigma EF 530 DG Super | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1747 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||