Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 Oct 2005 (Monday) 01:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Surfing/beach..which

 
Dead ­ Cell
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 24, 2005 01:58 |  #1

I was wondering if a 70-200 f/2.8 with 1.5x kenko would be able to reach for surfing pictures. If it doesn't, would the 100-400 be good for surfing pictures? Not sure if it would be fast enough. Also, wondering if i should use a uv filter for protection from the ocean spray and blowing sand. Should i cover my 20d with a plastic bag or something from sand and water?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 24, 2005 05:53 |  #2

During the day there should be plenty of light for a 100-400 to get good pictures. I'm not sure if the 100-400 gains weather sealing from a UV filter, but it's unlikely to hurt so long as you get a good quality multicoated filter - I like B+W filters. The 20D may benefit from some protection, be especially careful changing lenses on the beach - do it in a car or inside a bag if you can.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blue ­ Deuce
"I don't say anything witty"
Avatar
3,752 posts
Likes: 58
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Cent. Fl.
     
Oct 24, 2005 06:18 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #3

I think you will find the 70-200 is not long enough for surfing pictures. I use my 100-400 for them and find myself wishing I had more reach. I guess it would depend how far off shore the break is where you are planning on using it.

You wont have any trouble with the 100-400 being too slow. If anything you need to shoot with smaller aperatures, low ISO and fast shuuter speeds due to the amount of sun and all the reflecting surfaces.

Beach locations are also one of the few places I use my UV filter. I figure if a piece of glass is going to get pitted or scratched from winds or such, better it be a "throw away" filter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Krapo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,018 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Brussels, Belgium
     
Oct 24, 2005 08:17 as a reply to  @ Blue Deuce's post |  #4

Get a waterproof case, a 35mm, a bodyboard and go into the water! ;)

Joke aside, I have never seen a surfing / windsurfing picture from an amateur being even close to what you can see in surf magazines. Have you?

I wonder where it comes from. Of course, most of the pros use 500 or 600 f4, or even shoot from an helicopter so we can't say we play in the same league here.

Maybe this is a good example of subjects where equipment DOES matter a lot.

What do you think?

Do you have examples of nice surfing pics, and advices?


François
---
40D + grip, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 24-70 f/2.8L, 17-40 f/4L, 50 f/1.4, 580 EX II
www.casualvision.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidEB
Goldmember
Avatar
3,117 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
     
Oct 24, 2005 08:32 |  #5

depends on your beach, dude. at a crummy beach (like most in north carolina) where the break is close to the shore you can do OK with 400mm. At the better beaches the break is outside and you need to be on a boat, helicopter or a board. I've done OK at places where the break is around a point or rock barrier and you can get out on that.

Use a filter to protect your lens from salt water and put the whole camera + lens inside a clear plastic bag, close off the front with a rubberband. not perfect but keeps casual sand and saltwater off it.


David
my stuff - [URL="http://www.pbase​.com/davideb"]my gallery - [URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=3928125&postcou​nt=1"]go Rats!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,616 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Surfing/beach..which
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Sandro Bisotti
1754 guests, 170 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.