From a photo shoot with Jackie, she wanted something Rihanna themed as she does impersonations of her.
Shot in my home studio. Mix of hard and soft lights, and some Photoshop work for flair and spot
Canon 1D Mk IIn, 24-70 2.8L, iso 100, f5.0, 1/200
Aug 06, 2011 15:36 | #1 From a photo shoot with Jackie, she wanted something Rihanna themed as she does impersonations of her. Douglas Portz Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 07, 2011 12:21 | #2 Wow, not a single comment.... Guess it wasn't that good a shot as i thought Douglas Portz Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bgray Member 127 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Milan, OH More info | Aug 07, 2011 12:33 | #3 Overall, it is a great photo. http://briangrayphotography.blogspot.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 07, 2011 20:13 | #4 ahhhh okay, I ligthened it in post to try and convey the spot light from above. Maybe a bit too much.... thanks Douglas Portz Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tman2782 Senior Member 987 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Muscat, Oman More info | Aug 08, 2011 07:21 | #5 I agree, the lighting and processing is such that her body is exhibiting too many variations in tone. Terence
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 10, 2011 09:17 | #6 Based on the comments I received here and another site, I reworked the image a bit. Douglas Portz Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cujojpn Member 135 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA More info | Aug 10, 2011 09:41 | #7 That lense flare (is it one?!) is killing this photo. And I think it could even be cropped tighter, a lot of dead space on the bottom. Kaleb W.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HappySnapper90 Cream of the Crop 5,145 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Aug 10, 2011 15:47 | #8 Is that big quarter circle in the bottom right corner "fake" lens flare? (along with the 2 white dots one being on her arm) If so, take them out as fast as you can! I haven't seen any fake lens flare that look even decent. Because they all look digitally created, unnatural.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
moeronn Goldmember 2,516 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Aug 10, 2011 15:54 | #9 The reworked image does look a lot better, but have to agree that the PS flare is not helping the image. Try a version without the flare and see what it looks like to compare. Also, see if you can reduce the glare/highlights on her forehead, nose and cheek. They seem a bit bright.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RockyRhode Goldmember 1,416 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Sacramento More info | Aug 10, 2011 17:50 | #10 Many things I really don’t like from the pose; the triangle shape is suppose to draw the viewer into her face, but the lighting puts too much emphasis on the arm and distracts from her face. The Photoshop effects are killing this from the ugly white spot on her arm to the fake flare; shiny forehead, nose, and cheekbone are very distracting; maybe add a layer to fade out the skin glare…She is strikingly beautiful
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 10, 2011 22:51 | #11 alot going on in this photo. It looks like a flyer for a nightclub IMO. For starters ditch that lens flare. LIGHT>LENS>BODY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is icebergchick 1700 guests, 174 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||