First one
second one
HughR Senior Member 999 posts Joined Feb 2011 Location: Toronto, Ontario More info | Aug 08, 2011 13:14 | #2 First one is far too smooth. Second is better, but perhaps even a little less smoothing would be best. Hugh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 08, 2011 13:15 | #3 HughR wrote in post #12897695 First one is far too smooth. Second is better, but perhaps even a little less smoothing would be best. Thank you. I appreciate it really.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
oneDee Member 40 posts Joined Jan 2011 More info | I'd say a bit less would be better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 08, 2011 13:25 | #5 oneDee wrote in post #12897742 I'd say a bit less would be better. ill work on it tonight and post the one. thanks again.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shockey Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Boise Idaho More info | Aug 08, 2011 13:27 | #6 Two is pretty close...go one step less and will probably be about right. ___________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 08, 2011 13:33 | #7 Shockey wrote in post #12897767 Two is pretty close...go one step less and will probably be about right. When the skin is as as smooth as plastic...that is what it looks like. Like the shot. Any suggestions what software? I heard good things about Portrait Pro. Im currently using PSE8 for smoothening. Thanks for the input. Really appreciate it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
navydoc Cream of the Crop More info | I like the 2nd edit best also for smoothing. I might also suggest a bit of sharpening of her eyes and to brighten them just a bit. Here's a quick edit to show you what I mean. I hope you don't mind. Gene - My Photo Gallery ||
LOG IN TO REPLY |
not at all. thanks^
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shockey Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: Boise Idaho More info | Aug 08, 2011 13:46 | #10 I use Port Pro. If used conservatively it works really well and only takes 3 or 4 minutes per photo. ___________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JakAHearts Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 08, 2011 13:49 | #11 To me, for this style of shot, number 2 has a good forehead and her right cheek. Her left cheek is too smooth because since its in shadow, it should show more imperfections/pores than the slightly more blown out right cheek.... I think. Shane
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RockyRhode Goldmember 1,416 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Sacramento More info | Aug 08, 2011 15:05 | #12 |
DdavisMotocross Senior Member 333 posts Joined Feb 2011 More info | Aug 08, 2011 15:11 | #13 Rocky Rhode wrote in post #12898308 Too much skin smoothing for my taste; her left cheek has no features as they have been removed in the PP.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rittrato Goldmember 1,224 posts Likes: 28 Joined May 2010 More info | 1st of all, really great shot!!! Love the lighting falling down on her and the composition. 2nd, the model is stunningly beautiful. 3rd, yes I agree with the others, the second pic is better but could use a just a tiny bit less skin processing. Almost there!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woodworker Goldmember 2,176 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: East Midlands, England More info | Aug 08, 2011 16:39 | #15 They're all interesting. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1158 guests, 160 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||