Some pictures at Stone mountain. All c/c are appreciated.
...
Deleted
philubonmat Member  More info Post edited over 7 years ago by philubonmat. | Aug 08, 2011 23:07 | #1 Some pictures at Stone mountain. All c/c are appreciated. 5DsR, Rokinon FE 12 mm f/2.8, Canon 35 II f/1.4, Sigma 50mm f/1.4, MP-E 65mm,Canon 85mm f/1.4 L IS, Canon macro 100mm f/2.8, Canon 17-40mm f/4.0 L,Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L, 580ex II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
keny Senior Member  771 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2011 Location: Pointe-Calumet Qc, Canada More info | Aug 09, 2011 00:06 | #2 |
ps_n_dslr Senior Member 408 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Aug 09, 2011 00:08 | #3 Skin seems over-processed in all of them, especially #1 and #4.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Markd102 Senior Member  More info | White balance is different in each too. See if you can get the skin tones to match.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
dharrisphotog Goldmember  2,331 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | Aug 09, 2011 07:45 | #5 |
GenuineRolla Goldmember  1,355 posts Likes: 10 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Putnam, CT More info | Aug 09, 2011 11:49 | #6 those tones and borders...spot on! flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 10, 2011 22:56 | #7 I agree with the borders, they look kinda cheesy. The white balance looks inconsistent and pose 2 and 3 look very unnatural. LIGHT>LENS>BODY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MTStringer Goldmember  4,652 posts Likes: 6 Joined May 2006 Location: Channelview, Tx More info | Aug 10, 2011 23:18 | #8 So what is wrong with the borders? Looks like digital scrapbook material to me. I don't see anything wrong with them. Just my thoughts to go along with all y'alls.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
chrispanas Senior Member  More info | Aug 11, 2011 11:06 | #9 the borders look like a cheap "one click effect" from Picassa or something similiar. this is a no-no for me. also, a bit to much blurring doesn't look too good either. specially, when the model is really gorgeous and doesn't need any "special effects" adjustments to the photos. but that's just my opinion
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bleufire Goldmember  1,203 posts Likes: 53 Joined Mar 2008 Location: California More info | Aug 11, 2011 11:16 | #10 chris panas wrote in post #12916627  the borders look like a cheap "one click effect" from Picassa or something similiar. this is a no-no for me. also, a bit to much blurring doesn't look too good either. specially, when the model is really gorgeous and doesn't need any "special effects" adjustments to the photos. but that's just my opinion  +1 5D*Sigma 50/1.4*EF 17-40/4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RockyRhode Goldmember  1,416 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Sacramento More info | Aug 11, 2011 11:23 | #11 |
Brian_R Goldmember 2,656 posts Likes: 8 Joined Aug 2010 More info | Aug 11, 2011 12:01 | #12 #1 is good and #2 would be better is she smiled maybe
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rsieminski Senior Member  733 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jul 2008 Location: Sunny Florida More info | Aug 11, 2011 15:37 | #13 + 1 Rocky Rhode wrote in post #12916738 Would really like to see what you started with; way too much processing and addition of cheesy borders take away from the actual photograph. --Rick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Naphtali14 Member 70 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: Chicago, USA More info | Aug 11, 2011 15:51 | #14 -I really really really do not like any of the borders. Daniel Sather
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1462 guests, 138 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
