Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 12 Aug 2011 (Friday) 08:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

488 RC2 vs. 498 RC2

 
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,384 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 408
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Aug 12, 2011 08:48 |  #1

Having a 488 RC2,I needed to pick up an additional new tripod head.
I bought the new 498 RC2. For people that had both the old 488 RC2 and 498 RC2, a little "like" and "don't like" between the two would be helpful.
Thanks.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Aug 12, 2011 10:14 |  #2

Nick5 wrote in post #12922160 (external link)
Having a 488 RC2,I needed to pick up an additional new tripod head.
I bought the new 498 RC2. For people that had both the old 488 RC2 and 498 RC2, a little "like" and "don't like" between the two would be helpful.
Thanks.

Howzabout you telling us what you've discovered. I don't have any of the new 49x family heads am interested in any performance differences.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bagman
Senior Member
Avatar
273 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Toronto
     
Aug 12, 2011 10:36 |  #3

SkipD wrote in post #12922615 (external link)
Howzabout you telling us what you've discovered. I don't have any of the new 49x family heads am interested in any performance differences.

Jokes. I think the OP wants others to tell him if he likes his purchase or not. ;)


EOS 70D | Canon 70-200mm F4L IS | Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 XR Di II | 430EX II | Lowepro Nova 170AW & Slingshot 202AW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Aug 12, 2011 10:47 |  #4

I suspect he still hasn't received it yet.......


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,384 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 408
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Aug 12, 2011 16:12 |  #5

I bought my 498 yesterday at my local shop. Have not yet had a chance to compare "real results". Since the 488 was discontinued, the only option is the 498. Just looking to see if any real improvements. Does the friction control really help. That's all.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TijmenDal
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands
     
Aug 13, 2011 05:08 |  #6

Is that a question? I don't get it...
Or are you trying to ask if you did a good job in buying that new 498? I think only you can answer that question...


//Tijmen
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/tijmendalexternal link

Gear
______________
flickrexternal link
_____________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,384 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 408
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Aug 13, 2011 07:55 |  #7

All I am asking is how does it compare to the old one. It's not rocket science guys. Many new products that are released are for improvements, some to reduce costs. I am not looking for support to see if I made the right decision, just seeing how the new one compares to the old reliable 488.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Aug 13, 2011 09:02 |  #8

I own a 498RC2 but I have never owned a 488RC2. You are the best person right now to tell us how they compare.

We expect a full report by Monday. ;)


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,766 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
488 RC2 vs. 498 RC2
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
1321 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.