Just picked up the 16-35II... I have a couple 77mm filters like the b&w cpl nano and a couple nd's
I was wondering if anyone has used 77mm filters with an adapter and what the results were... Vignetting?
Aug 18, 2011 18:11 | #1 Just picked up the 16-35II... I have a couple 77mm filters like the b&w cpl nano and a couple nd's Chris -- Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | Aug 18, 2011 19:45 | #2 The 77mm filters will have way too much vignetting on the 16-35mm. I'm not actually sure how much you will get using a crop camera, but on a FF you can't do it. Why don't you try it out and see how it is, since you already have the lens and the filter? Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2011 20:00 | #3 Well I don't have an adapter to mount the filter... I know its only a few bucks but I figured I'd ask before I wasted the money... Chris -- Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneJZsupra Goldmember 2,378 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Guam More info | Aug 18, 2011 20:14 | #4 I have both the lens and the camera I can get an answer for you in one second..... Gear List | Feed Back | My Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2011 20:24 | #5 seoul4korea wrote in post #12960020 I have both the lens and the camera I can get an answer for you in one second..... OK heres what I did. I mount the lens and did a few test shots and at first placed the filter into the lens barrel (77 fit inside) and held it in place at the filter threads. I used live view and zoomed back and forth and didn't see any vignetting effects due to the filter. I then took the filter and held it with about a finger tips width away from the filter threads and zoomed back and forth and didn't notice an effects as well so from what I've seen it seems to be ok. The only thing I could think of would be if the adapter is oddly shaped or sticks out a huge amount for some reason. Thanks for the testing. I think from the pics of the adapter that I saw its just the thickness of the threads that it would extend from the front element. Chris -- Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneJZsupra Goldmember 2,378 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Guam More info | Aug 18, 2011 20:35 | #6 I imagine it would work then considering I put the filter into the lens barrel . Gear List | Feed Back | My Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2011 20:44 | #7 Sounds like it will. I guess ill just order one. Much cheaper than buying a new set of filters. Chris -- Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Cypther Member 147 posts Joined Feb 2011 More info | Aug 18, 2011 21:08 | #8 No filters on my lenses, just the naked lens exposed to the outside world. Lakyla.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneJZsupra Goldmember 2,378 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: Guam More info | Aug 18, 2011 21:18 | #9 ^^^ Well it really depends.... I mean he could be talking about CPL's, or ND filters or a whole slew of other filters. Gear List | Feed Back | My Site
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 18, 2011 21:23 | #10 Cypther wrote in post #12960312 No filters on my lenses, just the naked lens exposed to the outside world. I'm not using them for protection. I am using them for their purpose. I don't usually keep a filter on unless the shot calls for it... Just like my original post said, CPL and ND Chris -- Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 673 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||