Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 19 Aug 2011 (Friday) 16:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

A cautionary tale when photographing minors

 
Frugal
Senior Member
Avatar
784 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Northern CA
     
Aug 19, 2011 16:24 |  #1

http://shine.yahoo.com …ts-2529083/#photoViewer=1 (external link)


Richard
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Hot ­ Bob
Goldmember
1,021 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sanger, Texas
     
Aug 19, 2011 17:02 |  #2

That was five minutes of my life that could have been used for something more productive...like sorting pocket lint.

Bob


Image of the Horse (external link)

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
[Cerberus]
Member
67 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Southern Maine
     
Aug 19, 2011 17:04 |  #3

Sounds like they feel like they were not paid enough for farming their daughter out as a model.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
13,691 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 910
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
Aug 21, 2011 16:12 as a reply to  @ [Cerberus]'s post |  #4

If the court goes along the same line as the GARRY GROSS v. BROOKE SHIELDS decision, the parents are likely to lose--the provocative nature of the images is not likely to be an issue, as long as they were not explicitly pornographic. The only thing likely to be an issue is whether the "understanding" that some of the pictures were not to be used is enforceable....

The bottom line is that parents have to man-up in the first place and not let dollar signs blind them to their parental responsibilities.

http://ny.findacase.co​m …9851015_0050296​.NY.htm/qx (external link)

http://iconicphotos.wo​rdpress.com …ke-shields-by-gary-gross/ (external link)


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mmb
Member
117 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Aug 22, 2011 08:14 |  #5

[Cerberus wrote:
='[Cerberus];12964790'​]Sounds like they feel like they were not paid enough for farming their daughter out as a model.

+1

That's what I got out of it too.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Aug 22, 2011 10:59 |  #6

RDKirk wrote in post #12973566 (external link)
If the court goes along the same line as the GARRY GROSS v. BROOKE SHIELDS decision, the parents are likely to lose--the provocative nature of the images is not likely to be an issue, as long as they were not explicitly pornographic. The only thing likely to be an issue is whether the "understanding" that some of the pictures were not to be used is enforceable....

The bottom line is that parents have to man-up in the first place and not let dollar signs blind them to their parental responsibilities.

Hey how about a NWS warning on your links next time seriously :mad:


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,769 views & 0 likes for this thread
A cautionary tale when photographing minors
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is lindahaynesss
805 guests, 217 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.