Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 22 Aug 2011 (Monday) 17:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

digitize analog b/w and color pictures

 
winam
Goldmember
1,942 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Shanghai, China
     
Aug 22, 2011 17:17 |  #1

Hey folks,
I am about to digitize my old analog pictures and was wondering, if you can give me some advice.

I have an HP Photosmart C3180 Multifunction Printer.

I use MS Windwos 7 Enterprise 32-Bit on my Laptop.

The Pictures I want to digitize are in color and b/w.

I decided to scan the pictures with a resolution of 4000dpi to have enough elbowroom for cropping.

Therefore, that I have quite a lot of pictures I would love to place 2 or more depending on there size on the scanner, but I can't find this feature in the Software of the Scanner.
So I decided to install another Software.

I tried Vuescan 9 (only the trial edition), but i breaks down all the time after scanning. I couldn't find a feature for scanning multiple pictures to multiple files. What I like on Vuescan is, that I can make an automated Color correction, store as scan raws, etc.

So I searched a little more and found Nuance PaperPort 12. I remember to owned it with my first HP Scanner 15 years ago or so.

Can you give me some tips on other Software?
Which File-Format should I use? 16bit-Tiff or jpg?


thanks and kind regards winam


Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
http://www.rene-photography.de/ (external link)
Please take a look at my Review for the awesome Daminion Server DAM-System (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 209
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Aug 22, 2011 17:31 |  #2

If these are prints then there's no reason to scan at 16-bit because 8-bit will exceed what's on the paper. Also, there's no reason to scan at 4000 because the scanner probably can't do any better than 1800. The sensor certainly can record that high, but the crappy glass and lens compromise its potential. All you'll do is have a high pixel count image without any improvement in resolution. Keep in mind that a 4000 ppi scan is 4x the size of a 2000 ppi scan.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Aug 22, 2011 17:42 |  #3

If you're scanning prints I don't know if I'd bother scanning any higher than 600 dpi. I'm not sure if scanning any higher would yield any more detail.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Aug 22, 2011 18:35 |  #4

Even a little 4x6 inch print scanned at 4000 ppi would make an 8 bit tif that is nearly 1 GB. An 8x10 would be 3.7 GB. Not only would that fill up your hard disc mighty fast, any attempt to edit them would probably crash the software.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
winam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,942 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Shanghai, China
     
Aug 23, 2011 10:25 as a reply to  @ tzalman's post |  #5

Thanks folks,
I will consider your hints. Maybe your're right. I will try to scan in different dpi-levels to see the difference before i scan all pictures.


Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
http://www.rene-photography.de/ (external link)
Please take a look at my Review for the awesome Daminion Server DAM-System (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jasongraaf
Senior Member
Avatar
624 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2009
     
Aug 23, 2011 22:23 |  #6

Don't bother, 8bit at 600dpi is more information than there is on the print.


Flickr (external link)
-------------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 23, 2011 22:44 |  #7

I haven't done any scanning for a bunch of years, but when scanning prints I was pretty satisfied with a 600ppi tiff scan. They are indeed large files, but if the original print is good, they can make decent prints at say 8x10.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Aug 24, 2011 10:28 |  #8

You might want to browse this site. http://scantips.com/ (external link)
Lots of good info. Generally, most recommendations for scanning prints is 300 dpi, as you're limited by the amount of detail in the print itself. B&W prints have a bit more detail so maybe 400 dpi, or so. Negatives and slides are a different thing as they are the originals. Those can be scanned at the higher resolutions.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,446 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
digitize analog b/w and color pictures
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1675 guests, 179 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.