Combo
1. 7D + 15-85 + 35 f1.4 L
2. 5Dii + 24-105 L + 50 f1.4
what is better
Many thanks !
| POLL: "7D + 15-85 + 35 f1.4 L or 5Dii + 24-105 L + 50 f1.4" |
7D + 15-85 + 35 f1.4 L | 7 14.9% |
5Dii + 24-105 L + 50 f1.4 | 40 85.1% |
Wish_Star Senior Member 292 posts Joined Dec 2010 More info | Aug 24, 2011 03:33 | #1 Combo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NinetyEight "Banned for life" More info | Aug 24, 2011 13:14 | #3 Wish_Star wrote in post #12989549 Combo 1. 7D + 15-85 + 35 f1.4 L 2. 5Dii + 24-105 L + 50 f1.4 what is better ![]() Many thanks ! Depends on what you want it for Kev
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wissigle Member 204 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Brooklyn More info | Aug 24, 2011 14:13 | #4 I don't think "for what" is relevant here. The lens choices both offer the same equivalent focal lens, and close focal lenghts at that, so unless you're shooting close fast action sports at clsoe distance (in which case the 7D might be the better option), I can't see a single reason why the 7D option would be better. The image quality you would get from the 5D combo would be significantly better than the 7D combo (except perhaps at f1.4 from the 50mm and 35L). Unless you'd be shooting a lot at f1.4, or if you have significant autofocus requirements, the 5D combo is in my mind a no brainer. PS this is based on JUST the lenses detailed above. Clearly you'd need to think about the other lenses and activities you'd use these for otherwise... Wissigle
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 25, 2011 11:02 | #5 Wissigle wrote in post #12992176 I don't think "for what" is relevant here. The lens choices both offer the same equivalent focal lens, and close focal lenghts at that, so unless you're shooting close fast action sports at clsoe distance (in which case the 7D might be the better option), I can't see a single reason why the 7D option would be better. The image quality you would get from the 5D combo would be significantly better than the 7D combo (except perhaps at f1.4 from the 50mm and 35L). Unless you'd be shooting a lot at f1.4, or if you have significant autofocus requirements, the 5D combo is in my mind a no brainer. PS this is based on JUST the lenses detailed above. Clearly you'd need to think about the other lenses and activities you'd use these for otherwise... Bold above: Are you saying that the 5DII is not sharper than the 7D at f1.4? Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kronie Goldmember 2,183 posts Likes: 7 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Aug 25, 2011 12:38 | #6 No brainer for me:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 25, 2011 12:42 | #7 sharrowm wrote in post #12997535 Bold above: Are you saying that the 5DII is not sharper than the 7D at f1.4? With the 50/1.4... it's quite possible (and likely) that the image won't be as sharp since the 50/1.4 is not known to be a sharp performer when shooting wide open. There are some good copies floating around but most don't look all that great until 1.8-2.0. Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2011 03:08 | #8 and 100-400mm L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Aug 27, 2011 08:19 | #9 |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1822 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||