Yes ! but 24L f1.4 for low light at home (for party im house) better than 35L ?
The wider angle of the 24mm would probably work better in smaller areas like inside of a home than the 35mm.
yourdoinitwrong Goldmember 2,394 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Indiana More info | Aug 25, 2011 21:43 | #16 Wish_Star wrote in post #13000839 Yes ! but 24L f1.4 for low light at home (for party im house) better than 35L ? The wider angle of the 24mm would probably work better in smaller areas like inside of a home than the 35mm. 5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jwcdds Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 25, 2011 23:02 | #17 Wish_Star wrote in post #13000839 Yes ! but 24L f1.4 for low light at home (for party im house) better than 35L ? My answer to that is, "Yes." Julian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
x_tan Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 25, 2011 23:06 | #18 Wish_Star wrote in post #13000839 Yes ! but 24L f1.4 for low light at home (for party im house) better than 35L ? Both lenses have f/1.4; but 24L is wilder and bit easy to use in a house party IMHO. Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonK Goldmember 2,161 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2004 Location: PA USA More info | Aug 25, 2011 23:13 | #19 24L without a doubt 7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jp129 Senior Member 294 posts Joined May 2010 Location: TEXAS More info | Aug 26, 2011 00:56 | #20 This topic has been discussed to death. They produce similar IQ. The 24LII is weather sealed and has newer lens coatings, with a heftier price tag. I have had both and think they are both phenomenal lenses, just pick the FL you prefer to use and that's the lens for you. For me, it was the 24LII. DRIVER > GLASS > BODY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
aboss3 Goldmember 2,616 posts Joined Jan 2010 Location: LOS ANGELES More info | Aug 26, 2011 01:03 | #21 Permanent banDude, for a crop, go with Siggy and get some other glass. Sigma is just as good as 35L for 30% of the cost. I wouldn't hesitate to grab one again. Gear | My gear is changing faster than I can update the signature
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2011 03:04 | #22 Thanks to all !
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spaniard Senior Member 424 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Singapore More info | Aug 27, 2011 08:00 | #23 Congrats to you. Derrick
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | Aug 27, 2011 08:06 | #24 Good choice. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
blugup Member 245 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Long Beach, CA More info | Aug 27, 2011 09:44 | #25 you'll love it. great lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boingy Goldmember 1,052 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2011 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Aug 27, 2011 11:24 | #26 |
kingbob734 Senior Member 869 posts Joined Dec 2009 Location: Cheshire, UK More info | Aug 27, 2011 13:36 | #27 Iv had both the sigma 30mm and the 24L, and i prefer shooting with the 24L, the lens is a lot more accurate when it comes to AF, it doesn't hunt as much in low light, it was very hit and miss sometimes with the sigma. The sharpness is better i feel on the 24L too Gear List ●●flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1736 guests, 151 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||