Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 29 Aug 2011 (Monday) 15:18
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Reno Air Races 2011

 
Nmcgrew
Senior Member
874 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Mill Creek, WA
     
Sep 19, 2011 15:36 |  #46

Yes, it was likely coolant and if it was fuel (which there should have been a little bit of), then it would have been diluted by the coolant. Also, aluminum doesn't like to spark much when it hits things and the engine, the only major source of heat very quickly departed the area. Had there been 250 gallons of fuel on board, a fire would have been more likely.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spectre
Senior Member
Avatar
825 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Escondido, CA
     
Sep 19, 2011 15:42 |  #47

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13116590 (external link)
So far, according to social media chatter, everyone there to shoot appears to be safe and ok.

A good portion of us were out at Pylon 2 at the time of the accident.


Todd M. Allen TacAir Photography (external link)
"you've never lived, until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know"
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spectre
Senior Member
Avatar
825 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Escondido, CA
     
Sep 19, 2011 15:45 |  #48

Nmcgrew wrote in post #13118339 (external link)
Jimmy was 74 and medically certified and highly capable of flying in the race. His age had nothing to do with this.

sigma pi wrote in post #13118556 (external link)
They say that him blacking out maybe a possibility.

Anyone, regardless of age would have blacked out in that situation.


Todd M. Allen TacAir Photography (external link)
"you've never lived, until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know"
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 19, 2011 15:47 |  #49

Nmcgrew wrote in post #13128760 (external link)
Yes, it was likely coolant and if it was fuel (which there should have been a little bit of), then it would have been diluted by the coolant. Also, aluminum doesn't like to spark much when it hits things and the engine, the only major source of heat very quickly departed the area. Had there been 250 gallons of fuel on board, a fire would have been more likely.

Any Nitro or Alcohol blended into the fuel? May not have even been able to see the flames...

spectre wrote in post #13128793 (external link)
A good portion of us were out at Pylon 2 at the time of the accident.

Truly one of the great ironies in all of this. People who signed their lives away out on the course, under the pylons come away (physically) un-scathed. Definitely not the way most would expect it to go.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Sep 19, 2011 15:56 |  #50

spectre wrote in post #13128809 (external link)
Anyone, regardless of age would have blacked out in that situation.

I did not say he was old, that's why he blacked out, neither did the other person.


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spectre
Senior Member
Avatar
825 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Escondido, CA
     
Sep 19, 2011 16:20 |  #51

sigma pi wrote in post #13128867 (external link)
I did not say he was old, that's why he blacked out, neither did the other person.

I apologize, I thought you were aiming that Jimmy blacking out might have been the cause and not a result of the catastrophic failure of the trim tab.

I have not had much sleep in the past few days.


Todd M. Allen TacAir Photography (external link)
"you've never lived, until you've almost died. For those who fight for it, life has a special flavor the protected will never know"
My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 19, 2011 21:32 |  #52

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13128327 (external link)
They carry just enough fuel to run the race and perhaps maybe a half gallon more due to weight.

I should have thought of this before, but do you know if they use the original tanks, or maybe a smaller fuel cell?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 19, 2011 21:34 |  #53

I don't know Frank.

Fuel is usually a weight and balance concern which impacts performance so I don't know how they "weight jack" race planes.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
adamsti
Goldmember
Avatar
1,559 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 98
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Minooka, IL
     
Sep 20, 2011 00:29 |  #54

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13128327 (external link)
They carry just enough fuel to run the race and perhaps maybe a half gallon more due to weight.

Galloping Ghost had a very unique cooling system. You'll notice that it did not have the usual scoop below the cockpit like stock Mustangs have. It had a "boil off" system whereby the engine was cooled by dousing it with coolant and letting it blow off overboard. More than likely that's what people are calling "smoke" seen in one or two of the images floating around the web. Picture the "pop off valve" on a NASCAR cup car when they get hot and vent steam right near the right pillar of the windshield.

More than likely, people were splashed by hot coolant and not fuel.

Actually the oil cooler sits in a tub of ADI/water mix. Usually 50/50 split. As the ADI/water heats up it boils, hence the two steam ports on the side of the plane. As the ADI/water starts to boil more is needed, so it is pumped in from the wing tank.

There were four planes using boil off systems this year. The Ghost, Rare Bear, Furias, and September Fury. September Fury I was told has a DC-7 oil cooler beneath the cockpit. Don't know if that is true or not. Much of this stuff is kept very secret.

Normal super Mustangs like Strega have a split radiator. Approximately one half pumped for coolant, and one half pumped for oil. To keep it cool, spray bar systems are used to pour gallons of water over the radiator. This is why Strega looks like it has a fire hose pouring out the back at high power settings.


7D, 5D MKIII, 17-40 f/4L, 24-70 f/2.8L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, 300 f/2.8L IS, 500 f/4L IS, 1.4xII, 2.0xII
"I love the smell of racing gas in the morning"
http://www.timadamspho​tography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 20, 2011 00:30 |  #55

Thanks for the added tech info Tim.

Hope you're doing ok...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ryanapem
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
664 posts
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Washington
     
Sep 20, 2011 09:30 as a reply to  @ FlyingPhotog's post |  #56

First off, my prayers and condolences go out to everyone involved with this incident. There are countless people missing families and friends now and that is truly tragic. I feel very fortunate to have been far enough away to be safe and to be able to choose to look away and insulate myself somewhat from the horrors of the event. We all know that this is the last thing Jimmy would have wanted and that he would have done anything in his power to prevent it, but once the failure began he was just a passenger with nothing he could do. Right now, his family and friends need prayers more than ever, along with the families and friends of those lost and injured on the ground.

PhotosGuy wrote in post #13128299 (external link)
I wonder why it did not blow up on impact. Some people had aviation fuel all over them. The speculation is that the force of the impact blew outwards and it extinguished any sparks that would ignite the fuel. Lucky people!

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13128327 (external link)
More than likely, people were splashed by hot coolant and not fuel.

I was upwind of it by a few hundred feet but I had 10 or so very close and very aviation knowledgeable friends a few hundred feet downwind who were misted with fuel. The smell is very distinct.

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13128327 (external link)
They carry just enough fuel to run the race and perhaps maybe a half gallon more due to weight.

Weight is a factor, but they are still required to carry the minimum 30 minutes reserve stipulated in the FAR's. However, that is 30 minutes at cruise power, not race power. Still though, that is normally 20-50 gallons extra, not .5 gallons.


-Ryan
I spend too much on flying to have much equipment worth listing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Sep 20, 2011 11:59 as a reply to  @ ryanapem's post |  #57

spectre wrote in post #13129010 (external link)
I apologize, I thought you were aiming that Jimmy blacking out might have been the cause and not a result of the catastrophic failure of the trim tab.

I have not had much sleep in the past few days.

No big deal just wanted to clear that up :D I did quote the other person to show I was talking about the pilot, kind of a weird quote.

I know how those days are :(


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
miccullen
Member
Avatar
240 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Spokane, Washington State, USA
     
Sep 21, 2011 19:53 as a reply to  @ sigma pi's post |  #58

has anyone seen the pics that look as though the pilot is no longer visible in the cockpit?

leading to speculation that the pilots seat mounts broke and the seat moved the pilot out of reach of the controls?


Noob Gear: EOS Rebel XT, 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-80mm, 55-250mm IS, and a bag full of other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Sep 21, 2011 20:36 |  #59

Conventional wisdom among regular attendees and even some participants in a group over on Facebook seems to discount the seat theory.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
miccullen
Member
Avatar
240 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Spokane, Washington State, USA
     
Sep 21, 2011 20:39 |  #60

FlyingPhotog wrote in post #13142079 (external link)
Conventional wisdom among regular attendees and even some participants in a group over on Facebook seems to discount the seat theory.

just curious, thanks


Noob Gear: EOS Rebel XT, 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8, 35-80mm, 55-250mm IS, and a bag full of other stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,023 views & 0 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it.
Reno Air Races 2011
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
916 guests, 111 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.