Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 30 Aug 2011 (Tuesday) 12:36
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Re-thinking my Aisle-Walk lens?

 
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Aug 30, 2011 12:36 |  #1

Ok, someone just posted a thread a little bit ago asking what wedding photogs go-to lens is for the aisle-walk, and after reading some of the responses, I realized that a couple of them hit on something that has been bugging me when we shoot-- I always slap on my 70-200L IS because I know I can depend on it to get those super sharp shots, and because the 2.8 is needed (at the least) in these venues where flash is not allowed. But I always find myself wishing I had a wide angle at some points. So. I'm pretty sure I can part with my 85 1.2 wihtout regret since I got the 50 1.2L (love!). We have a 24-70L but my husband usually has that on his 7D. I also have a 24L but am afraid of (1) the distortton at the edges and (2) not being able to get any tight shots. Someone on the aformentioned thread stated how much they love their 24-105L but I'm afraid of the f/4 for those flash-prohibited venues...open to ideas :D


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Aug 30, 2011 12:57 |  #2

I'm not answering your question, but have to say that I've never shot a ceremony where I couldn't at least use flash for the processional.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,366 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 812
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 30, 2011 13:07 |  #3

My experience is that at MY wedding the photographer was instructed not to use the flash during the ceremony by the Pastor. There have been a couple Catholic weddings in older churches where Flash also has been banned during the ceremony but allowed for the after shots. I don't know why that is that they allow flash after the ceremony but not during.

Anyway, my current go to lens for the aisle shots is the 24-105L It's really my only good zoom lens. I like the 24mm when they're nearing the end of the pews. The hand off of the bride to the groom is crucial and 70mm at it's closest zoom point would not cut it even on my 5D. Also, with a 24-70, I don't think 70mm would get me out far enough down the aisle. I have a 28-135 that I have yet to use at a wedding because I have it loaned out to a friend of mine who lives in another state. But I think the 24-105L does a fine job from way in the back to right up close.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scorpio_e
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,402 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 264
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Pa
     
Aug 30, 2011 13:18 |  #4

CameraMan wrote in post #13025107 (external link)
I don't know why that is that they allow flash after the ceremony but not during.


It is a distraction DURING the ceremony.


www.steelcityphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PeaceFire
Goldmember
Avatar
2,281 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Glendale, AZ - Chico, CA - Duluth, MN
     
Aug 30, 2011 13:26 |  #5

Well, you know my answer to this! Like CameraMan, I like the range. 105 is great for when they are further down and when they get closer to the end of the aisle for close-ups. I like that I can get both close-ups (at 105) and full body shots (at 24) at that point. f/4 has never been a hindrance for me, but I will admit that I shoot very few church weddings and when I do they are pretty well lit.


My Gear List / My Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Aug 30, 2011 13:53 |  #6

Peacefield wrote in post #13025057 (external link)
I'm not answering your question, but have to say that I've never shot a ceremony where I couldn't at least use flash for the processional.

We did one just a few weeks ago that prohibited flash from the time the bride/father hit the pew mark till the end of the ceremony (meaning when the bride/groom left the sanctuary). Another one before that let us use flash only when the bride first walked in.

PeaceFire wrote in post #13025184 (external link)
Well, you know my answer to this! Like CameraMan, I like the range. 105 is great for when they are further down and when they get closer to the end of the aisle for close-ups. I like that I can get both close-ups (at 105) and full body shots (at 24) at that point. f/4 has never been a hindrance for me, but I will admit that I shoot very few church weddings and when I do they are pretty well lit.

You've blown your cover! :lol: Yeah that lens sounds perfect except that aperture bothers me based on our past experience.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,366 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 812
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 30, 2011 13:55 |  #7

Aperture is a bit small but I haven't had a problem yet. Although I haven't had the problem of not being able to use a flash. :D


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timnosenzo
Cream of the Crop
8,833 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Sep 2005
Location: CT
     
Aug 30, 2011 14:28 |  #8

Are you just using 1 camera body? Any chance of picking up another? Even if is was a 40D, you'd be able to put your 24L on that body and have a great combo for the ceremony.

Personally I could never do the procession with just one camera body. The 2nd wedding I ever did, pitch black venue (old theater), I had my flash die while the bride was walking down the aisle with her father. Luckily I had my other camera on me ready to go and was able to keep going. So even though having 2 bodies is nice for lens selection its also nice having a backup ready to go immediately.


connecticut wedding photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 30, 2011 15:15 |  #9

Just put a wider lens on your second body. If you don't have a second body, get one.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mtimber
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,011 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Cambs, UK
     
Aug 30, 2011 15:30 |  #10

^^+1

Pick up a used body and another lens (buy another one for hubby and get that 24-70 back...).

2 x R-Straps, one on each side of your body and you are covered.


"Lovely photo, you must have a really good camera"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gh ­ patriot
Goldmember
1,310 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Grand Haven, Michigan U.S.S.A.
     
Aug 30, 2011 17:04 |  #11

tim wrote in post #13025773 (external link)
Just put a wider lens on your second body. If you don't have a second body, get one.

+1 =)


2 x 5D III | 40D | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 35L | 50[B]L | 85IIL | 100 L |135L | 300 f4L | | 24-70L | | 70-200 2.8L II | 2XL |
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Aug 30, 2011 17:34 |  #12

timnosenzo wrote in post #13025495 (external link)
Are you just using 1 camera body? Any chance of picking up another? Even if is was a 40D, you'd be able to put your 24L on that body and have a great combo for the ceremony.

Personally I could never do the procession with just one camera body. The 2nd wedding I ever did, pitch black venue (old theater), I had my flash die while the bride was walking down the aisle with her father. Luckily I had my other camera on me ready to go and was able to keep going. So even though having 2 bodies is nice for lens selection its also nice having a backup ready to go immediately.

tim wrote in post #13025773 (external link)
Just put a wider lens on your second body. If you don't have a second body, get one.

mtimber wrote in post #13025847 (external link)
^^+1

Pick up a used body and another lens (buy another one for hubby and get that 24-70 back...).

2 x R-Straps, one on each side of your body and you are covered.

gh patriot wrote in post #13026340 (external link)
+1 =)

I personally don't have my own back up camera-- my husband's 7D is officially my back up right now. I had thought of the 2x Rstrap with 2 bodies as the best solution-- I've just resisted buying another body cause we're waiting for the elusive 5D MKII to be released, which would become my new camera, the MKII my huisband's and the 7d the true back up body. Tho, truth be told, I do not like shooting with the 7D; just what you're used to, I guess. Thanks for the replies!


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bigarchi
Senior Member
Avatar
962 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2008
Location: upstate ny
     
Aug 30, 2011 19:20 |  #13

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #13026501 (external link)
I personally don't have my own back up camera-- my husband's 7D is officially my back up right now. I had thought of the 2x Rstrap with 2 bodies as the best solution-- I've just resisted buying another body cause we're waiting for the elusive 5D MKII to be released, which would become my new camera, the MKII my huisband's and the 7d the true back up body. Tho, truth be told, I do not like shooting with the 7D; just what you're used to, I guess. Thanks for the replies!

are you selling your services to the client as two photographers though?
because if you are and you only have two cameras between the two of you, that doesn't sound like you have any backups to me.

when i have my wife shoot with me, we don't have any less than 3 cameras as the client is paying for both photogs to be functional, not just me
i guess if they aren't paying for your husband to be shooting then his is a backup

anyway, just my .02
and i find using two cameras during the processional essential.


~Mitch

my gear and feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4201
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Aug 30, 2011 19:34 as a reply to  @ bigarchi's post |  #14

Michelle

You should have 2 bodies at all times. Like Peaceman, i have yet to shoot a wedding where i could not use my flash for the walk down the isle. The most strict churches want flash off during the actual religious ceremony. The walk down the isle has never been an issue for anyone that i know and we shoot a lot of catholic full mass weddings.

I prefer to use my 24-105 and my bracket when she walks down the isle. I usually click off 4-5 shots and im out of there. We know what the settings are in advance and i usually catch the hand off to the groom and the hug from dad before i switch off the flash. At that point we are completly no flash until the pronouncement and the flash is back on for the walk out.

We have photographeed about 60 weddings in the past 3 years and every one that has a strict policy allows you to use flash in the isles before and after the ceremony.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,366 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 812
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Aug 30, 2011 20:29 |  #15

I usually get one shot of each brides maid walking down the aisle, flower girl(s), ring bearer and the bride and father. I usually get 5 or 6 of the bride coming down the aisle. The problem with not having a 2nd shooter is that I would like to have a shot from behind and off to the side of the father to groom hand off. But I usually don't get a good enough angle for that.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

11,435 views & 0 likes for this thread, 28 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Re-thinking my Aisle-Walk lens?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
811 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.