Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 30 Aug 2011 (Tuesday) 16:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Rock and hard spot

 
Dr.D
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Likes: 104
Joined Feb 2011
Location: SL,UT.
     
Aug 30, 2011 16:13 |  #1

So with the year quickly coming to an end I'm starting to get a little more excited knowing that soon I will have my tax return in hand and headed to the local camera shop. With that being said I'm faced with what lens to get? My thoughts are a used 70-200 2.8 IS or a 100-400 used or new. I really want to be able to get that sweet bokeh and think that I would use the 70-200 more since I very seldom get to go anywhere to get some awesome animal shots, but at the same time I really don't want to get caught with my pants down either if I happen to go to Yellowstone or somewhere else where I'd need that reach. I'm pretty close to Yellowstone, so the chances of going up there are pretty good and think now that more of my friends are getting into this hobby we'll be going more often. So here are my questions. Should I just get the 200 and a extender? What's with the date codes and what should I be looking for? Will the 2X extender give me the same results as a 400? What's the difference in the 70-200 1 and 2? I'm pretty sure I'll have money left over for the 2, but is it really that much better?


6D . Gripped 60D . Gripped XSI . Opteka 6.5 . Canon 10-22 . Canon 18-135 . Canon 50 1.8 MKII . Canon 24-105 f4 L . Canon 70-200 2.8 IS MKII L . Canon 70-300 IS USM . Sigma 150-600 . Canon 100mm Macro . Canon 2X III . 430 EXII . Manfroto 190XPROB . Manfrotto 055XPROB . Black Rapid Sport . Outback 200
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1195651

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bboehm
Senior Member
706 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Aug 30, 2011 16:28 |  #2

Here's my philosophy... If I have the money to buy the best, then I do it. In the case of the 70-200, I bought the Mark II because I was able to sell off some of my old gear that I wasn't using much anymore and one lens that the 70-200 replaced. I also bought it refurb from Canon and saved $500. I've heard nothing but absolute rave reviews on this lens and I knew if I didn't have it, I would always be wondering how much better my shots could be with it. So now I don't have to worry about that anymore. I bought the 2X extender as well for those rare times when the extra reach is needed. I think if you're a bird photog or something like that then you need a dedicated 400 or 500 prime, but for the occasional reach, I think the extender is fine.


7D, 50D, EFS 17-85mm IS, 24-70mm f/2.8L, 50mm f/1.2L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 2X Extender III, Calumet Genesis 400, Speedlite 430EX, Pocket Wizards

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vixen89
Goldmember
Avatar
4,521 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Aug 2010
Location: D-Town, TX
     
Aug 30, 2011 16:41 |  #3

I vote you go 70-200 2.8 IS with the extender!


I'm actively lazy!! :D | Gear List | photovxn.com (under construction)external link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edwin ­ Herdman
Senior Member
747 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Aug 30, 2011 17:12 |  #4

The 70-200mm and 100-400mm are completely different lenses, and they perform differently on different formats. You can add a teleconverter to the 70-200 and do pretty well, although I think some people say it's not as good as the bare 100-400mm combination (though IS should still be better), but at that point you are looking at a price almost double that of the 100-400mm, if you buy a new EF 2X III extender.

I have been promoting this lens a lot, but another option that is only somewhat more expensive than the 70-200mm f/2.8 is the Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8. It can be rented online if you're unsure. It's a heavy lens, but with a teleconverter I think it's more suited for bird photography than the 100-400mm since you get an effective 600mm f/5.6 lens. On the other hand, the 70-200mm will do great at your average "zoo distance" from medium to large animals. Small birds, though - forget it. Even the 400mm focal length feels far too short for the smallest birds, even on APS-C, even nearly within feather-pulling distances.

The question you should ask yourself at this point is - what will one lens or the other do for me?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,284 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1598
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Aug 30, 2011 17:14 |  #5

70-200 f2.8 II with the TC2III is pretty amazing. It's not going to give you the same IQ as the 400 f5.6 wide open (I've got both), but stopped down 2/3 and it's pretty nice.

I'm selling my 400 cause I'm not using it, but it's certainly is lighter than the 70-200.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,183 views & 0 likes for this thread
Rock and hard spot
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is lindahaynesss
767 guests, 235 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.