Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 01 Sep 2011 (Thursday) 06:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

the digital picture sigma 17-50 OS review

 
match14
Senior Member
Avatar
362 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
Sep 01, 2011 06:40 |  #1

Has any one seen this review. http://www.thedigitalp​icture.com …C-OS-HSM-Lens-Review.aspx (external link). Whats with corner crops with the trees, the scene shifts with every lens used, even the two Tamrons are completly different, and why does he not show a full sixed image so we can see where the crops came from in relation to the entire scence (I know he says they are top left but how big a top left corner is that). Above all it flies in the face of what a lot of users on here say about the 17-50 OS.


David
500px (external link)
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DiMAn0684
Goldmember
Avatar
1,933 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Boston, MA
     
Sep 01, 2011 07:55 |  #2

Photozone has sample photo images which you can see full size and zoom in to see @ 100%. Corners look fine to me.

http://www.photozone.d​e …31-sigma1750f28os?start=2 (external link)


Canon 5D MkII | Canon 16-35mm f/4 | Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM | Canon 24-105mm f/4 | Tamron 70-300mm VC | Canon 430EX II | Benro A2682TB1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LostInInaka
Senior Member
Avatar
500 posts
Joined Jul 2008
Location: Takizawa, Iwate, Japan
     
Sep 01, 2011 08:37 |  #3

Agreed...fantastic lens at price savings when compared to the more expensive Canon...glad I went for the Sigma


5DmkIII | Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 | Canon 16-35mm f/2.8L mk II | Canon 24mm f/1.4L mk II | Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L mk II | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L | Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS mk II | + Misc
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
Return of the Jedi
Avatar
9,911 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2005
     
Sep 01, 2011 12:32 |  #4

Summary from the review: "If you don't need sharp corners (except at f/11) and you don't need every shot focused perfectly, the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Lens is a great lens for the price. This is a good upgrade-to-the-kit-lens option."

LOL! What the heck?! Another "favorable" review of a 3rd party lens from TDP :lol:

I'm going to trust myself on this one :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Sep 01, 2011 12:56 |  #5

LightRules wrote in post #13036153 (external link)
Summary from the review: "If you don't need sharp corners (except at f/11) and you don't need every shot focused perfectly, the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Lens is a great lens for the price. This is a good upgrade-to-the-kit-lens option."

LOL! What the heck?! Another "favorable" review of a 3rd party lens from TDP :lol:

I'm going to trust myself on this one :D

Yeah, that made me chuckle too :)


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Sep 01, 2011 14:07 |  #6

I like the lens so far, but to be honest, the corner performance at wider FL is not stellar. For example, for a large group portrait, using 28mm and f/5.0, faces near the edge were obviously more blurred, and needed selective sharpening. The same for my landscape shots at 17mm - with the apertures I usually use (f/8-f/10), edges are obviously soft.

I can't compare this to my previous lens (Tamron), because the Tamron had serious AF problems, and even at the center short FL shots were way off.


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,018 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
the digital picture sigma 17-50 OS review
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
916 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.