Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Sep 2011 (Thursday) 09:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Soft Images

 
General_T
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Sep 01, 2011 09:33 |  #1

Hi,

I have only had the camera for about a week, but am troubled by the "soft" look of the pictures straight out of the camera. I am shooting all RAW pics and have tried all the different combos from full Auto to full Manual. Don't get me wrong - I am no professional but from what I have read and seen for myself there is a real issue here. And this is not from pixel peeping either.

I have read a lot of reveiews and peoples opinions about this issue. I have tried to convince myself that I would be happy with the results after PP - but somehow this seemed odd to have to rely on PP for a decent picture with this level of Camera?

My big hangup with this is that I have spent $3000 for a camera and lens and I can't get a sharp picture straight out of the camera? I have to do PP to improve the image. I am quite disappointed as I do truly love the features of this camera and wish I was over the moon with it. It sucks though when your wife is looking over your shoulder and commenting that they dont seem to be very sharp even relative to a P&S.

I bought it for the AF / Movie and sports capability, but whats the point if the images are disappointing straight out of the camera?

And I crazy to expect a $3000 camera/lens combo to be able to give me a razor sharp image as shot? What am I missing.

I know a lot of you will say that these tack sharp results can be had with a lot of PP but I want a high quality pic right out of the camera and then do PP if I decide I want to - NOT BECAUSE I HAVE TOO.

I can still return this camera and get another. At this point I am willing to go another brand to get what I want. I am reluctant to get the 5Dmk2 as it lacks the quality AF and sports shooting of the 7D.

Is there a camera/lens combo for $3000 out there that will satisfy me?


Please forgive my ramblings and help as this is really bumming me out.:cry::cry:


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grahamesoden
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Likes: 135
Joined Jan 2010
Location: I live in Vormsele, Sweden Lapland, but I'm English
     
Sep 01, 2011 09:55 |  #2

Hi - I don't have your lens but I do use a 7D and it can give razor sharp results straight out of the camera. Like you, I was very disappointed when I first got my 7D - soft soft images! I found that I had to spend a LOT of time learning to use the different focussing options then some more time micro adjusting my lenses for the camera. There really isn't any short cut but the 7D will repay the time you spend!

Just to make sure you haven't got a "duff" camera/lens -mount your camera on a tripod, use Live View, manual focus, maximum magnification and take a few shots in good light, perfect exposure, then look at them on the computer at 100%. They should be perfect.

good luck!
grahame s


grahame soden
ARPS, ABIPP
http://odensdawn.zenfo​lio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:00 as a reply to  @ grahamesoden's post |  #3

Most of the 7D soft image threads are a result of user error.

I would suggest you not shoot raw for awhile - understand that raw can mean a lot of different things depending how you have your converter set up.

DDP and PS tend to do things a little different with the raw's.

Anyway shoot jpeg with the sharpening turned up a notch or 2 in camera.

Watch the 7D videos on the B&H website and read the CF PDF's




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:12 |  #4

It's a known fact that one has to apply a bit more sharpening to the 7D's files. Half the process of getting a picture is developing it in post so for you to say that you aren't satisfied when there's 100's of people that are, then the posibility of this being a situation where user error is to be blamed stands out.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:15 |  #5

Hi Grahemesode,

I have not tried any MA on my len, will that have a noticeable effect? I'm guessing its trial and error to find the right correction?

Hi Palladium,

All my PP is done in Photoshop CS5 (using Camera RAW)


I have read that the AA in the 7D is too agressive? Anyone agree with that. Is that something that a software/firmware update to the camera can fix?


Thanks


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:24 |  #6

As others have said the 7D images do need a bit more sharpening in PP, but the camera is capable of great images. To be honest your lens isn't top class and 18MP certainly shows the flaws if your glass is under par, as it does with bad technique. My walk round is the Canon 15-85 which is a good lens even though it isn't an L here's an example. Also post some of your images so folk can check them out.

IMAGE: http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q290/artymanphotos/Photography/Trains/Img_1845.jpg

Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:24 |  #7

General_T wrote in post #13035529 (external link)
Hi Grahemesode,

I have not tried any MA on my len, will that have a noticeable effect? I'm guessing its trial and error to find the right correction?

Hi Palladium,

All my PP is done in Photoshop CS5 (using Camera RAW)

I have read that the AA in the 7D is too agressive? Anyone agree with that. Is that something that a software/firmware update to the camera can fix?

Thanks

MA can be an issue but you should post samples first to determine if that might be it. The AA filter has been discussed quite extensively and a lot of people blame it for the images that require quite a bit more sharpening as previously stated.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ebann
Once an ugly duckling
Avatar
3,396 posts
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Chimping around Brazil since 1973! (Sometimes NYC)
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:28 |  #8

With higher MP count, getting motion-induced blur is very likely. Canon recommends doubling your shutter-speed than what you normally shoot with. Also, it is not recommended to pixel-peep at 100% crop to gauge pixel sharpness since the higher MP count will reveal that motion-induced blurriness.


Ellery Bann
Fuji X100
6D | Rokinon 14 2.8 | 50 1.4
1D Mk IV | 24-70 2.8L | 70-200 2.8L IS | 135 2L | 400 5.6L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Palladium
Goldmember
3,905 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:43 |  #9

General_T wrote in post #13035529 (external link)
...

All my PP is done in Photoshop CS5 (using Camera RAW)...

Using PS's converter is good but that's just the beginning

within Camera Raw you have many decisions to make. I would suggest that your set up default profiles for each ISO for the 7D. I would pay special attention to the Chroma and Luminance noise reduction settings for each ISO eg. gradually increasing these settings as your ISO increases.

It's been suggested and probably proven that using Canon software DDP with RAW images improves the images noise by about 1 stop.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dasweb
Member
101 posts
Joined Dec 2009
     
Sep 01, 2011 10:44 |  #10

Palladium wrote in post #13035670 (external link)
Using PS's converter is good but that's just the beginning

within Camera Raw you have many decisions to make. I would suggest that your set up default profiles for each ISO for the 7D. I would pay special attention to the Chroma and Luminance noise reduction settings for each ISO eg. gradually increasing these settings as your ISO increases.

It's been suggested and probably proven that using Canon software DDP with RAW images improves the images noise by about 1 stop.

Also, to touch on what Palladium said; if you do use a lot of noise reduction that can make your images look softer.


7D Gripped | 50mm F/1.4 | 135mm L | 70-200mm F/2.8 |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 01, 2011 11:23 |  #11

artyman wrote in post #13035578 (external link)
As others have said the 7D images do need a bit more sharpening in PP, but the camera is capable of great images. To be honest your lens isn't top class and 18MP certainly shows the flaws if your glass is under par, as it does with bad technique. My walk round is the Canon 15-85 which is a good lens even though it isn't an L here's an example. Also post some of your images so folk can check them out.

That, I am sorry to say, is completely inaccurate. The 17-55 is very, very capable of very, very sharp images wide-open and can go head to head against the L's in this range (24-70, 24-105). That lens, coupled with the 10-22, are the two reasons many people end up getting a crop body.

Don't go dismissing the lens just yet, let's just take a look at some test images to see where the issue lies.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 01, 2011 11:27 |  #12

General_T wrote in post #13035529 (external link)
Hi Grahemesode,

I have not tried any MA on my len, will that have a noticeable effect? I'm guessing its trial and error to find the right correction?

Hi Palladium,

All my PP is done in Photoshop CS5 (using Camera RAW)


I have read that the AA in the 7D is too agressive? Anyone agree with that. Is that something that a software/firmware update to the camera can fix?


Thanks

The AA filter is a physical optical unit, you can send it in to places to replace it with other pieces of glass, but I would strongly suggest not doing that. It is not too aggressive, Canon put it at the level they feel it needs to be for the density of the sensor.

Let's just start at the basic "battery test" (http://cameralightlens​.com …1/01/CLL-focus-test-1.jpg (external link))

Set up 5 AA batteries staggered from each other about a battery's length apart from each other.

Make sure you have bright light over the entire scene. Set your camera to Av, ISO 400, aperture of f2.8, set to One Shot, set EC to +1/3, and try to get to a shutter of 1/160th or faster if possible.

Then get down to the same level as the batteries, stand back about a yard/meter, zoom to 55mm, focus with manual center AF point on the center of the 5 batteries, and take a shot. Do this a few times to make sure you have a consistent pic.

This will 1) help identify whether you can even get a sharp pic at all w/the 7D, 2) whether the lens can provide a sharp enough photo wide open to please you, and 3) whether the 7D+lens is front or back focusing.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwp721
Senior Member
771 posts
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
     
Sep 01, 2011 11:55 |  #13

TeamSpeed suggested the battery test... but the link is somewhat misleading. As he mentions make sure you are shooting straight on towards the batteries and not downward as the picture shows (done to show you the spacing).

IMAGE: http://www.pbase.com/jwp721/image/104523099/original.jpg

Also please post some pictures that you are not happy with. It is hard to discuss your issues without something to look at.

John



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 01, 2011 11:58 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #14

I have had no problems...

These images were shot with the 7D camera right out of the box using the default parameters of exposure and focus... 70-200mm f/4L IS lens, 550EX flash bounced using a Stroboframe Camera Flip Bracket and modified with a Joe Demb Flash Diffuser Pro...

IMAGE: http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/photos/1245211231_aEf5x-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com …bqh#1245211231_​aEf5x-A-LB  (external link)

IMAGE: http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/photos/1244551055_ox8GE-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com …bqh#1244551055_​ox8GE-A-LB  (external link)

IMAGE: http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/photos/1244840976_GPhDr-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com …bqh#1244840976_​GPhDr-A-LB  (external link)

IMAGE: http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/photos/1244320241_7kTXJ-L.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com …bqh#1244320241_​7kTXJ-A-LB  (external link)

See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MJones
Senior Member
299 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 01, 2011 12:07 as a reply to  @ RPCrowe's post |  #15

I shoot exclusively with a 7D and I NEVER have to apply any sort of sharpening in post! I'd say spend more time with the camera and understand that you use it differently than say, a T2i or 5D...


Facebook: www.facebook.com/Photo​sByMartello (external link) 500px: http://500px.com/Photo​sByMartello (external link) Website: www.photosbymartello.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

20,200 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it.
7D Soft Images
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2205 guests, 88 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.