Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
POTN forums are closing 31.12.2023. Please see https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1530921 and other posts in that thread for details.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Sep 2011 (Thursday) 09:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7D Soft Images

 
mangrovedutch
Senior Member
522 posts
Joined Mar 2010
Location: S.E. Qld, Australia
     
Sep 03, 2011 16:32 |  #76

G'day all, Thank you to KCBrown, tonylong and paparios for your answers to my question. I have every bit of confidence in the 7D. It was starting to sound like this camera required PP before you can get a decent result out of it, which obviously is not the case. I will learn how to shoot in RAW, as it gives me so much more data to play with, which means using my CS5, PSE9 or DPP a bit more to get familiar with it. I was fairly confident that this camera will give me fantastic shots SOOC, I just didn't want another 7D Bagger jumping in saying that this camera required PP for a decent image. I can't wait till my camera gets here, then I too, can pull the rest of my hair out in the initial few weeks, until I get used to all the great technology in the 7D. I think coming from a 550D, it will be a bit of a learning curve to figure out where all the settings are, but that is halve the fun of it....... (he says hesitantly LOL)

Regards, Dutch




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Sep 03, 2011 20:38 |  #77

mangrovedutch wrote in post #13046602 (external link)
G'day all, Thank you to KCBrown, tonylong and paparios for your answers to my question. I have every bit of confidence in the 7D. It was starting to sound like this camera required PP before you can get a decent result out of it, which obviously is not the case.

It doesn't require PP to get good results from the 7D. It does take PP to get the best results from it. But the 7D is no different than any other camera in that regard.

The only notable difference between the 7D and other cameras is that it seems to require more sharpening (i.e., a higher sharpness setting) than other cameras do. But when you set the sharpening values appropriately, you'll get excellent images from it (as long as you do your part as a photographer, of course).


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AJSJones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,647 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 92
Joined Dec 2001
Location: California
     
Sep 03, 2011 22:10 |  #78

General_T wrote in post #13044730 (external link)
How do you sharpen in the Camera, when shooting RAW, before downloading the pics for PP. I thought you can only adjust sharpness using a Picture Style when shooting JPEG's?

By the way, the raw files from the 7D already have a full-size jpeg embedded in them that was processed according to the style parameters you set. I'm not sure what level of compression is used but they look quite good - there are utilities that can extract them as separate jpegs (batchwise, too). The jpeg is saved in the raw file along with the unprocessed raw data. It's what you review on the back of the camera after the shot, or when you play them back later...


My picture galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kcbrown
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,384 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Silicon Valley
     
Sep 03, 2011 22:25 |  #79

AJSJones wrote in post #13047721 (external link)
By the way, the raw files from the 7D already have a full-size jpeg embedded in them that was processed according to the style parameters you set. I'm not sure what level of compression is used but they look quite good - there are utilities that can extract them as separate jpegs (batchwise, too). The jpeg is saved in the raw file along with the unprocessed raw data. It's what you review on the back of the camera after the shot, or when you play them back later...

I thought they were 10 megapixel jpegs, but I never have bothered to extract one. They're actually 18 megapixel jpegs?


"There are some things that money can't buy, but they aren't Ls and aren't worth having" -- Shooter-boy
Canon: 2 x 7D, Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 OS, 55-250 IS, Sigma 8-16, 24-105L, Sigma 50/1.4, other assorted primes, and a 430EX.
Nikon: D750, D600, 24-85 VR, 50 f/1.8G, 85 f/1.8G, Tamron 24-70 VC, Tamron 70-300 VC.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AJSJones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,647 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 92
Joined Dec 2001
Location: California
     
Sep 03, 2011 23:27 |  #80

Earlier Canon DSLRs created jpegs that were not the same size as the raw MP count, but more recent one(s) do the including 7D and 5D2
Just did a quick comparison between the "cr2" view in my Image management program (which lets me view embedded jpegs) and it looks pretty close to the view I get when I open the cr2 in DPP. The differences are small and of the magnitude one might get by slight tweaks on a slider in DPP. Definitely worth looking at for a quick "show and tell"!


My picture galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChinoChangInc
Member
Avatar
189 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Miami, Florida
     
Sep 03, 2011 23:41 |  #81

OP: have you tried shooting with a tripod? what ive noticed is that new users get antsy when they are taking photos and dont stay still.


EOS 7D
Canon EF 70 -200mm F/4L ;Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 II Canon EF-S 10 - 22mm F/3.5; Canon FD 28mm F/2.8 with Ed Mika Adapter ;Canon STM 40mm F/2.8
www.flickr.com/photos/​koreychang/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Sep 04, 2011 00:02 |  #82

Is there really a jpg file embedded into every RAW file on the 7D? It's not like other Canon DSLRs, where you can choose RAW+jpg or just plain RAW? I was thinking about getting a 7D as a backup to my two 5D classics, just to have that APS sensor make my 70-200 f/2.8 turn into a 105-300 f/2.8, but if there's a sharpness issue, maybe I'll pass. I've heard nothing but good things about the 7D, especially its AF system (why can't the more expensive 5D series have the same AF system???), so this sharpness issue is worrisome.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
citro
Member
167 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Bucharest, Romania
     
Sep 04, 2011 02:40 |  #83

PhotoMatte wrote in post #13047980 (external link)
Is there really a jpg file embedded into every RAW file on the 7D? It's not like other Canon DSLRs, where you can choose RAW+jpg or just plain RAW?

All Canon RAW files embed a JPEG file. RAW+jpg generates a separate JPEG file.


Canon 400D :: Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 :: Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L :: Tokina 12-24mm f/4 :: Speedlites :: Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Sep 04, 2011 07:12 |  #84

ChinoChangInc wrote in post #13047926 (external link)
OP: have you tried shooting with a tripod? what ive noticed is that new users get antsy when they are taking photos and dont stay still.

Hi,

No, havent tried a tripod yet. Only because I would not be using it 99% of the time so would like to be able to take decent shots freehand - if possible for me at least:)


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Sep 04, 2011 11:05 |  #85

Ok,

Tried a few shots while very steady with my hands and also just put the camera on the table. To me it looks sharp (DPP is using 6 as the sahrpening number). So I guess some of the "soft" I have noticed is (as all have said) user error.

But if I'm shooting at a high shutter speed (say 1/500+) shouldn't that eliminate any softness from movement?

One other question. When I select "unsharp mask" in DPP the image gets evn a little sharper looking. What does "unsharp mask" do?


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Sep 04, 2011 11:46 |  #86

Here is an example with "unmask Sharp" (1st image) and just sharpening (2nd image)


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 04, 2011 13:55 |  #87

Unsharp Mask (USM) is one of the many post processing tools we use in Photoshop and other tools to sharpen images after the fact. I prefer to do that last, after I have done all other processing, like removing noise, adding a bit of contrast and saturation, etc.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Sep 04, 2011 14:50 |  #88

Hi TeamSpeed,

Thanks, another piece of the puzzle.


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paparios
Senior Member
500 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
     
Sep 05, 2011 07:40 |  #89

PhotoMatte wrote in post #13047980 (external link)
Is there really a jpg file embedded into every RAW file on the 7D? It's not like other Canon DSLRs, where you can choose RAW+jpg or just plain RAW? I was thinking about getting a 7D as a backup to my two 5D classics, just to have that APS sensor make my 70-200 f/2.8 turn into a 105-300 f/2.8, but if there's a sharpness issue, maybe I'll pass. I've heard nothing but good things about the 7D, especially its AF system (why can't the more expensive 5D series have the same AF system???), so this sharpness issue is worrisome.

As I mentioned before, when you are shooting in RAW, any Canon Camera (at least my 400D, 50D and 7D cameras) does generate a JPG file which is embedded in the CR2 file. Software like Canon's Zoombrowser, or some viewers like Faststone are able to show this embedded file in your screen. The example below is the JPG embedded in the CR2 file of my Canon 50D. The resolution appears to be that of the camera (that is 4752x3168). The jpg resulting size is around 1.6 Mbytes. I opened the CR2 file with Faststone and copied the image to Paint and saved it as JPG and finally resized it to display it here. The LR3.4.1 processed file result is shown later.

Miguel


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 5D MKII, Sony A7, Canon EOS M, Canon 7D, Sony A6000, Canon 50d with grip, Canon 400D with grip, Bower 14 f2.8, Bower 35 f1.4, EF 40 f2.8, Tokina 12-24 f4, EFM-22 f2 STM, EFM 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, EFS 18-55 f3.5-5.6, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, EF 85 f1.8, EF 100 f2.8L IS, EF 70-200 f4L IS, EF 75-300 f4-5.6, Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3, Sony E 16-50, Sony FE 28-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

20,202 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it.
7D Soft Images
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2207 guests, 90 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.