I don't like zooms no more.
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Sep 01, 2011 16:39 | #16 |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | I tell eveyone the same thing. Primes are great but you cant beat the versatility of a great zoom. My zooms get a lot of work, especially the 24-105 and 24-70. I have one and my wife uses the other. She keeps the 35L in her bag, and i keep the 85L in my pocket for 80% of the workload. But everyone is different so what ever floats your boat is the one you should go with. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcolman Goldmember More info | Sep 01, 2011 16:46 | #18 I've owned both lenses. The 1.2 is better. Period. The bokah is pure creamy goodness. The CA in my 1.8 lens was bad. The downside to the 1.2 is it's slower to focus, heavy and expensive. But it's my "go to" lens (along with the 35L on my second body) for all my pre-wedding shots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
g-money Goldmember 1,601 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2006 Location: L.A. (Lower Arkansas) More info | Sep 02, 2011 09:48 | #19 If you want an awesome 85mm lens check out the Sigma 85 1.4. I recently sold my 85 1.8 due to horrible CA on many outdoor shots. I really wanted the Canon 85 L as I am an L junkie but for half the price of the Canon and image quality/bokeh to match plus it is not nearly as heavy and focus is fast and spot on I had to go with the Sigma. Canon 6D X 2, Canon 5D, FUJI X100, Canon Rebel XT, Canon 24-70L VII, Canon 35L 1.4, Sigma 85mm f/1.4, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Tokina 16-28 2.8, 580exII x2, Godox 850 X 2, 430ex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Sep 04, 2011 10:45 | #20 |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Sep 04, 2011 12:07 | #21 Looks like you are liking the lens!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Sep 04, 2011 12:51 | #22 yes the last wedding I did before this one. I used the sigma 85 and now on this one I used the 85 1.8. They compare real close. I won't be able to tell the difference besides the blur | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1652 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||