What would I gain if i bought a version 2 over the 3?
fitshaced Senior Member 442 posts Joined Jul 2011 More info | Sep 02, 2011 06:43 | #1 What would I gain if i bought a version 2 over the 3? http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsbykev/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver  More info | Sep 02, 2011 06:58 | #2 What are you using it with? Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Invertalon Cream of the Crop  6,495 posts Likes: 24 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Sep 02, 2011 06:58 | #3 |
Sep 02, 2011 07:01 | #4 I'm looking at buying a 200 2.8 ii but wanted to use an extender with this lens as well as my 24-105. But, I cant find anywhere that says the ext 2 iii will work with the 24-105 or not. http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsbykev/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Invertalon Cream of the Crop 6,495 posts Likes: 24 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Sep 02, 2011 07:04 | #5 |
Sep 02, 2011 07:07 | #6 Invertalon wrote in post #13040014  It will not work with the 24-105... The Canon ones, at least. Third party ones will. The Canon extenders have a baffle that extends into the lenses, and can only be used with EF telephotos primes and 70-200 zooms. Thanks. Just wondering why you own a 24-105 considering your other lenses. http://www.flickr.com/photos/picsbykev/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 05, 2011 09:07 | #7 I used to have the Canon 2 x Mk2 and traded it for a Mk3. On my lenses (70-200 F2.8IS, 300 F4 IS + 600 F4IS) the Mk3 is significantly better, giving better contrast, sharpness and colour in my opinion. The difference is not dramatic but it does give a higher "Keeper" rate. Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mdr Goldmember  1,167 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Glasgow, Scotland More info | Sep 05, 2011 14:46 | #9 Spending less... Marc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EdwinHerdman Senior Member 747 posts Joined Aug 2011 More info | Sep 05, 2011 15:14 | #10 Invertalon wrote in post #13040003 The 2x III is sharper then the 2x II, and has quicker AF I believe... With the 1.4x TC's, the difference is less, if at all between the two. The 2X III has SLOWER AF than the Mark II. This was done to improve AF accuracy, according to the real Chuck Westfall.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 999 guests, 110 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
