Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 02 Sep 2011 (Friday) 23:15
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Portable battery for flash

 
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Sep 02, 2011 23:15 |  #1

I used a friend's quantum flash recently to power my 580ex2, and am having a tough time finding the best one for it. I am thinking the Quantum Turbo, but the one I used had 2 ports to plug in flashes, and was wondering if that was the newer or older version. Any help w/ links to B&H would be greatly appreciated, or if there are other items that you may recommend.

Thank you.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 02, 2011 23:21 |  #2

I think it's called the Quantum 2x2. Click (external link). Looks like it was discontinued. New version here (external link).


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Sep 03, 2011 13:33 |  #3

Thats what I was looking for, thank you!


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Steve ­ Wintrow
Member
Avatar
187 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: TN
     
Sep 05, 2011 13:16 |  #4

I have the Quantum Turbo and it is great. Can't believe I waited so long to get one.


5DII, 1D Mark IIn, Canon 24-105 L, Canon 28-70 2.8L, Canon 70-200 2.8L IS, Canon 100-400L
Canon 580EX, 430EXII, PW+II, 2-FlexTT5
2-Prophoto Compact 600+PW

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Sep 05, 2011 14:23 |  #5

Steve Wintrow wrote in post #13054320 (external link)
I have the Quantum Turbo and it is great. Can't believe I waited so long to get one.

My problem was that I didn't wait long enough when I got mine. I bought my Turbo 2x2 in anticipation of what I thought would be the new Qflash T6D-R. However, that flash never came to light and instead the Qflash TRIO did which I didn't really care for. The battery pack is nice and all but was really an unnecessary purchase considering that I never went the Qflash route after all. I don't, however, regret the purchase since I can use it to power my Canon flashes and cameras, my Nikon SB-900 flash and my Metz 58 AF-1c flash, and two units simultaneously. :)


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Sep 05, 2011 14:46 |  #6

Never used the NiMh Quantum batteries, and there is something to be side for one battery that will plug into to flash units.
I did have some of the older Quantum Turbos with my Qflashes and also used them with my Canon Speedlites.
Now that I've sold off the Qflash I find the smaller 8 cell AA packs are much more economical, and do just as good a job. They are also smaller and lighter.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
c2thew
Goldmember
Avatar
3,929 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Not enough minerals.
     
Sep 05, 2011 16:05 |  #7

"8 cell AA packs are much more economical, and do just as good a job. They are also smaller and lighter."

i honestly don't know why anyone uses the quantum turbo system unless they are using them specifically for quantum Q flashes.


Flickr (external link) |Gear|The-Digital-Picture (external link)|The $6 mic | MAGIC LANTERN (external link) | Welding Filter
Go Support Magic Lantern 2.3!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Sep 05, 2011 19:01 |  #8

PacAce wrote in post #13054585 (external link)
My problem was that I didn't wait long enough when I got mine. I bought my Turbo 2x2 in anticipation of what I thought would be the new Qflash T6D-R. However, that flash never came to light and instead the Qflash TRIO did which I didn't really care for. The battery pack is nice and all but was really an unnecessary purchase considering that I never went the Qflash route after all. I don't, however, regret the purchase since I can use it to power my Canon flashes and cameras, my Nikon SB-900 flash and my Metz 58 AF-1c flash, and two units simultaneously. :)

Why didnt you like the Turbo? I have been debating getting one for a few days now, but have somewhat of a hard time getting too much information on them.

dmward wrote in post #13054666 (external link)
Never used the NiMh Quantum batteries, and there is something to be side for one battery that will plug into to flash units.
I did have some of the older Quantum Turbos with my Qflashes and also used them with my Canon Speedlites.
Now that I've sold off the Qflash I find the smaller 8 cell AA packs are much more economical, and do just as good a job. They are also smaller and lighter.

Im tired of charging AAs. Why did you get rid of your Qflash? Was it the turbo, or the other.

c2thew wrote in post #13055011 (external link)
"8 cell AA packs are much more economical, and do just as good a job. They are also smaller and lighter."

i honestly don't know why anyone uses the quantum turbo system unless they are using them specifically for quantum Q flashes.

Everyone I know that uses the battery packs dont use quantum flashes. I actually do not know anyone who uses the quantum flashes, but I have been looking to get one myself (as mentioned above in the post)


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Sep 05, 2011 19:59 |  #9

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13055819 (external link)
Why didnt you like the Turbo? I have been debating getting one for a few days now, but have somewhat of a hard time getting too much information on them.

Im tired of charging AAs. Why did you get rid of your Qflash? Was it the turbo, or the other.

Everyone I know that uses the battery packs dont use quantum flashes. I actually do not know anyone who uses the quantum flashes, but I have been looking to get one myself (as mentioned above in the post)

I never said that I didn't like the Turbo. Sorry if I led you into thinking that I didn't. What I was trying to say is that if I had waited until I got a Qflash before getting the Turbo battery pack, I probably wouldn't have one right now.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Sep 05, 2011 21:31 |  #10

The QFlash is older technology. Good light but expensive and limited functionality.
i.e. for me it was essentially a battery powered manual flash and for the price an Einstein and VML was cheaper and more flexible.

I replaced the SLA batteries in my Turbos and they were good batteries but did not deliver more flashes or faster recycle than the AA cell packs I had.

The other thing to consider, for me at least, is that most of the Speedlites I use on location are on a stand and I want an external battery for each. That means a lot of packs. $60 for the pack plus rechargeable AAs is a lot cheaper than the same number of Turbos.

I can buy an Einstein and VML cheaper than I can buy a QFlash and Turbro. The 8 cell packs (I have Pixel packs I buy now for Cheetahstand for $65z) are inexpensive and work.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Sep 05, 2011 23:34 |  #11

PacAce wrote in post #13056110 (external link)
I never said that I didn't like the Turbo. Sorry if I led you into thinking that I didn't. What I was trying to say is that if I had waited until I got a Qflash before getting the Turbo battery pack, I probably wouldn't have one right now.

That was my mistake, I meant why dont you care for the trio? I am pretty convinced I am going to get the turbo battery pack, but I am thinking the trio would be a great flash too. No overheating, better ettl performance (from what I have read) and better quality of light - especially when shooting outdoors with nothing to bounce off of. I understand it doenst have a whole lot more power, but I have my Einstein and VML for that.

dmward wrote in post #13056514 (external link)
The QFlash is older technology. Good light but expensive and limited functionality.
i.e. for me it was essentially a battery powered manual flash and for the price an Einstein and VML was cheaper and more flexible.

I replaced the SLA batteries in my Turbos and they were good batteries but did not deliver more flashes or faster recycle than the AA cell packs I had.

The other thing to consider, for me at least, is that most of the Speedlites I use on location are on a stand and I want an external battery for each. That means a lot of packs. $60 for the pack plus rechargeable AAs is a lot cheaper than the same number of Turbos.

I can buy an Einstein and VML cheaper than I can buy a QFlash and Turbro. The 8 cell packs (I have Pixel packs I buy now for Cheetahstand for $65z) are inexpensive and work.

All good points, and I do have a Einstein and VML for when I need the power, but the Trio basic looks really appealing for the reasons listed above.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Sep 06, 2011 14:52 |  #12

Red Tie Photography wrote in post #13057048 (external link)
That was my mistake, I meant why dont you care for the trio?I am pretty convinced I am going to get the turbo battery pack, but I am thinking the trio would be a great flash too. No overheating, better ettl performance (from what I have read) and better quality of light - especially when shooting outdoors with nothing to bounce off of. I understand it doenst have a whole lot more power, but I have my Einstein and VML for that.

All good points, and I do have a Einstein and VML for when I need the power, but the Trio basic looks really appealing for the reasons listed above.

When I was looking into the Qflash back then, I was interested in the upgrade to the T5D-R. The TRIO was a disappointed to me because its power output was half that of the T5D-R, it was a dedicated unit (I wanted a unit I could use with any camera) and I wanted a flash I could use off camera without needing to get a Pilot or buy into the FreeXwire wireless system.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Red ­ Tie ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,575 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
     
Sep 06, 2011 15:45 |  #13

PacAce wrote in post #13059957 (external link)
When I was looking into the Qflash back then, I was interested in the upgrade to the T5D-R. The TRIO was a disappointed to me because its power output was half that of the T5D-R, it was a dedicated unit (I wanted a unit I could use with any camera) and I wanted a flash I could use off camera without needing to get a Pilot or buy into the FreeXwire wireless system.

Those are all good reasons, and I am glad they are not hindrances to what I am looking for.


Bryan
Gear List (external link)
San Diego Wedding Photography - Red Tie Photography (external link)
Red Tie Photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4201
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Sep 06, 2011 16:22 as a reply to  @ Red Tie Photography's post |  #14

I looked at the Q-flash and decided to keep doing what ive been doing. I get the AA recharable batteries for the 580's. I have about 50 of them and 2 chargers. As soon as they start to slow down, i dump the batteries and put in 4 fresh ones. Not having any problems with the 580's at all and ive been doing it like this for 5 yrs. I have a compartment in my case just for the batteries..piece of cake.

We switched over to the Mini vagabonds from Alien bee and have been very pleased with the results. Outside, im using the mini and 2 AB 1600's and having zero issues. Its actually easier to use the mini and the strobes than to hook up the 580s and try to shoot outside and fight mother nature. Most of the time its 1 AB1600 and a medium softbox. Im having zero issues so its working great for us. Easier and cheaper than the Qflash set ups plus i can shoot at F/16:cool:,,,,,big difference


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,425 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4521
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Feb 04, 2012 11:20 |  #15

c2thew wrote in post #13055011 (external link)
"8 cell AA packs are much more economical, and do just as good a job. They are also smaller and lighter."

i honestly don't know why anyone uses the quantum turbo system unless they are using them specifically for quantum Q flashes.

1. After using a Turbo for over a decade before spending about $25 on a new lead acid battery, they are extremely economic to use...in my case, even amortizing the original new purchase price, it was less than $3/mo
2. They work with many, many flash units, not merely the Canon flash
3. Lots and lots of flashes without changing AA batteries in the middle of a job


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,438 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Portable battery for flash
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
540 guests, 120 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.