PacAce wrote in post #13056110
I never said that I didn't like the Turbo. Sorry if I led you into thinking that I didn't. What I was trying to say is that if I had waited until I got a Qflash before getting the Turbo battery pack, I probably wouldn't have one right now.
That was my mistake, I meant why dont you care for the trio? I am pretty convinced I am going to get the turbo battery pack, but I am thinking the trio would be a great flash too. No overheating, better ettl performance (from what I have read) and better quality of light - especially when shooting outdoors with nothing to bounce off of. I understand it doenst have a whole lot more power, but I have my Einstein and VML for that.
dmward wrote in post #13056514
The QFlash is older technology. Good light but expensive and limited functionality.
i.e. for me it was essentially a battery powered manual flash and for the price an Einstein and VML was cheaper and more flexible.
I replaced the SLA batteries in my Turbos and they were good batteries but did not deliver more flashes or faster recycle than the AA cell packs I had.
The other thing to consider, for me at least, is that most of the Speedlites I use on location are on a stand and I want an external battery for each. That means a lot of packs. $60 for the pack plus rechargeable AAs is a lot cheaper than the same number of Turbos.
I can buy an Einstein and VML cheaper than I can buy a QFlash and Turbro. The 8 cell packs (I have Pixel packs I buy now for Cheetahstand for $65z) are inexpensive and work.
All good points, and I do have a Einstein and VML for when I need the power, but the Trio basic looks really appealing for the reasons listed above.