Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 05 Sep 2011 (Monday) 11:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Optimum ISO levels for noise

 
mrmarks
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Sep 05, 2011 11:29 |  #1

I was just watching a video by Shane Hurlbut where he mentions that ISO 160, 320, 640, 1250, and 1600 gives the lowest noise. Why is this the case, and is this applicable to both still and video shots? Thanks for any inputs!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
artyman
Sleepless in Hampshire
Avatar
14,422 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 88
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Hampshire UK
     
Sep 05, 2011 11:40 |  #2

I think the theory is that it is the next higher ISO which is pulled down, rather than pushed which increases noise.


Art that takes you there. http://www.artyman.co.​uk (external link)
Ken
Canon 7D, 350D, 15-85, 18-55, 75-300, Cosina 100 Macro, Sigma 120-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrmarks
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
822 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2010
     
Sep 05, 2011 12:01 |  #3

artyman wrote in post #13053874 (external link)
I think the theory is that it is the next higher ISO which is pulled down, rather than pushed which increases noise.

Could you elaborate a little on what you mean by pull/push?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Sep 05, 2011 13:19 |  #4

mrmarks wrote in post #13053963 (external link)
Could you elaborate a little on what you mean by pull/push?

He means over and under exposing slightly... If your image is dark and you brighten it using post processing, you bring out the noise a lot more than if you overexpose it slightly and darken it using post processing..

It's been suggested that using whole ISO stops (100-200-400-800 etc) provide less noise because they are native stops and the stops in between involve over or underexposing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

818 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
Optimum ISO levels for noise
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1470 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.