Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Sep 2011 (Wednesday) 03:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Poor man is poor. Looking at affordable zoom lens.

 
TridenTBoy
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
Sep 07, 2011 03:39 |  #1

So I only have a 50mm f1.8 on a T2i. I don't have much money and so my budget is super limited.

I was thinking of picking back up the kit lens that came with the T2i (I sold mine for $80 to get the 50mm for $90). I've also thought about trying to get a cheap 28-135mm off of craigslist that comes with the more expensive kits. But I don't know. I need something wider for sure. The 50mm is way too narrow for me on a crop body. I find myself wanting to not step back but just get more in the image where I am standing. It's impossible to get any further back in a lot of situations too. So I am even left thinking maybe the 28-135 is the wrong choice because it only goes to 28, but it also goes all the way to 135...

Another problem is that I would like it to be a faster lens but that's asking too much at my as low as it gets price range.

What lens should I be considering here? And what if I jumped my budget to something like $500(it will never be that much, but hypothetically speaking).

Right now my budget is probably closer to $200 with an incentive to really get as low as possible.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1052
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
Sep 07, 2011 03:42 |  #2

New or consider used?

This (external link) is probably the best standard zoom , new, for $200.

For $500 you can have this (external link) new.

Or look at sigmas 17-70 (external link) if you want more range and image stabalisation (at the cost of f2.8 constant)


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headshotzx
Goldmember
Avatar
4,488 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
     
Sep 07, 2011 03:45 |  #3

Get back a kit lens for what you can spend... Or save up more and get the Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 used. That, or try manual focus lenses like those from Olympus and Nikon, with an adapter :)


Zexun | Flickr (external link) | YouTube (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
Sep 07, 2011 04:27 |  #4

I'd like to have the constant f/2.8 aperture but, again, those are just waaay out of my budget. The $200 sigma is looking OK to me, but I would like to find it for cheaper (used likely). :/ And some reviews are looking badly on the sigma 18-50mm 2.8-4.5... Some think the kit lens is better. The kit lens will be cheaper. (Slower too though, but whatever)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwicaksana
Senior Member
Avatar
456 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
     
Sep 07, 2011 06:07 |  #5

Sell your 50 1.8 to fund Tamron 17-50, perhaps?
Ever since I own the Tamron, my 50 1.8 rarely go out LOL


Cheers! :D
Jonathan's Gear List and flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 415
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Sep 07, 2011 08:10 |  #6

For now, just get yourself a used EF-S 18-55mm IS for about $100. Later you can add a used 55-250mm IS for about $150.

The combination of 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8 and 55-250mm is a VERY good set-up that will cover almost every situation you can imagine.

Later when you have more money, you can upgrade to more expensive lenses, but in reality, the increase in Image Quality will not be equal to the increase in lens cost. You will be paying more for things like faster focus, faster aperture, non-rotating front element, Full Time manual focus, etc. None of those things are really necessary to make a great image. They are nice to have, and can make life easier, but only if you can afford it.


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dawud
Senior Member
392 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Belgium
     
Sep 07, 2011 08:14 |  #7

msowsun wrote in post #13063586 (external link)
For now, just get yourself a used EF-S 18-55mm IS for about $100. Later you can add a used 55-250mm IS for about $150.

The combination of 18-55mm, 50mm 1.8 and 55-250mm is a VERY good set-up that will cover almost every situation you can imagine.

Later when you have more money, you can upgrade to more expensive lenses, but in reality, the increase in Image Quality will not be equal to the increase in lens cost. You will be paying more for things like faster focus, faster aperture, non-rotating front element, Full Time manual focus, etc. None of those things are really necessary to make a great image. They are nice to have, and can make life easier, but only if you can afford it.

+ 1


Camera • lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,474 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1078
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Sep 07, 2011 09:16 as a reply to  @ Dawud's post |  #8

Here is nothing wrong to buy back kit lens. I was not happy with it once I have my first L lens, but after I learned how to PP pictures taken from this lens it is just fine.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stover98074
Senior Member
Avatar
421 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Apr 2010
     
Sep 07, 2011 11:49 |  #9

Manual Focus older lenses will allow for 2.8, professional glass and good prices.

I use a Nikkor 24 2.8 AI lens (about $100 to $150 used) on a crop EOS body.

Wide lenses are relatively easy to focus and have a generious DOF.

Your EOS body will take Nikkors, Olympus, Pentax K, M42 (Pentax Takumars).

You can get Nikkors at places like Keh.com and I purchase from there I get their bargin grade lenses which are optically very good - cosmetically a little beat. The older Nikkors can take a beating.


Canon XSI, Asahi Pentax Auto Bellows, 50 Fujinon EP, 80 El Nikkor, 105 El Nikkor, 135 Fujinon EP
https://sites.google.c​om …xpensivemacroph​otography/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LemonScent
Senior Member
Avatar
343 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
     
Sep 07, 2011 12:00 |  #10

There's also the 18-135 which I've seen on the Sell forum for a little over $200. That would give you a wider angle than the 28-135...


Lisa
A full frame thingy, some lens thingys and a flashy thingy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
munzzzzzzz
Senior Member
591 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: SE WI
     
Sep 07, 2011 12:08 |  #11

Don't rule out the older Canon 28-105 lenses either. They can be obtained for < $150 and are pretty decent. Note that there are a few versions out there, two older ones are the ones you'd want to consider, I believe.


6D | 40mm f/2.8 | 50mm f/1.4 | 70-200mm f/4L IS | 580EXII | 2x PCB Einstein | Various Modifiers

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,435 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
     
Sep 07, 2011 12:17 |  #12

Option 1: buy the kit lens, keep the nifty fifty. Option 2: buy the Tamron 17-50 non-VC and sell the nifty fifty. Personally, I'd opt for #2, because the nifty fifty is not much faster than the Tamron. I would rather have 2.8 at all apertures than faster at 50, with a lens change, and slower at all other focal lengths. Others might prefer the reverse.

I agree that adding the 55-250 when there is enough cash would be a good way to extend your range further.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LaCeS ­ OuT
Member
129 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: New York City
     
Sep 07, 2011 12:55 |  #13

I recently bought the Canon 24-105mm L lens to replace my 60D kit lens which is 18-135mm. BHPhoto will give me $170 for it. If you want it, I will let it for $170 shipped. It is mint and looks brand new, no marks on it. PM me or best bet would be to email twofiftysx@gmail.com (external link)


Canon 60D - Canon 10-22; Canon 17-55; Canon 100 Macro; Canon 70-300 USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TridenTBoy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
110 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: West coast, USA
     
Sep 07, 2011 14:42 |  #14

I like to do a lot of low light shooting. I'm finding that 1.8 isn't even fast enough for it, but I think I should probably just give up on that stuff because it's really an impossible task. (It's something that really needs a flash but flashes are banned) The 17-50 tamron seems like a good choice but it's still out of my budget even if I sell my 50mm for $100.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,912 posts
Gallery: 559 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14871
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 07, 2011 14:47 |  #15

TridenTBoy wrote in post #13065406 (external link)
I like to do a lot of low light shooting. I'm finding that 1.8 isn't even fast enough for it, but I think I should probably just give up on that stuff because it's really an impossible task. (It's something that really needs a flash but flashes are banned) The 17-50 tamron seems like a good choice but it's still out of my budget even if I sell my 50mm for $100.

If 1.8 isnt fast enough its tripod time. At this stage of the game you should be thinking about adding to your kit, not trading. Just be patient until you can afford to add the next thing rather than selling one lens to get another. The IS version of the kit lens or one of the other wide to short tele zooms is probably a good option for your next lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,033 views & 0 likes for this thread, 31 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Poor man is poor. Looking at affordable zoom lens.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1265 guests, 178 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.