I think it depends a lot on the grears one is using.
Tom_D Goldmember More info | Sep 08, 2011 08:10 | #16 I think it depends a lot on the grears one is using. Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Unregistered.Coward Senior Member 884 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Looking thru the viewfinder More info | Sep 08, 2011 08:48 | #17 ....the best camera is the one you have on you at the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Madwrench Senior Member 633 posts Likes: 9 Joined Feb 2011 More info | Sep 08, 2011 08:54 | #18 I know you put the "e" in there intentionally to show the misspelling, but please tell me you put the possessive apostrophe in there to show incorrect use as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rpaul Senior Member 646 posts Likes: 12 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Los Angeles More info | Sep 08, 2011 09:00 | #19 |
ToddR Senior Member 766 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: central Iowa More info | Sep 08, 2011 09:16 | #20 I'm still waiting for the general population to learn the word its, which is not interchangeable with it's.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TuanTime Senior Member 759 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2009 More info | Its not very tackful to correct someones' grammor unless its in a spelling class. The peoples that spell improperly generally mess up there punctuation's and proper forms of werds two. Luckily I English is purrfect so just copy what I right and you will bee fine.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | Sep 08, 2011 09:34 | #22 ninetwentynine wrote in post #13068844 or am i wrong? i keep seeing 'TACT' written on the forum by other members, which made me wonder what the hell 'tact sharp' is, lol. 2 funnee! your like rite, of corz, sort of. my lense collection and like camera gears, their very polite and like way diplomatic, to. its one reazon why i buyz Cannon DLRS's & lens's cause of they're like kool red stripes on thoz wite lens's that like compliments the black camera's. their lookin gud! makes me like a way better photograph! Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | Sep 08, 2011 09:35 | #23 ToddR wrote in post #13069728 I'm still waiting for the general population to learn the word its, which is not interchangeable with it's. ![]() Good luck with that! Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ToddR Senior Member 766 posts Joined Feb 2009 Location: central Iowa More info | Sep 08, 2011 09:46 | #24 Oh, it's quite futile.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Unregistered.Coward Senior Member 884 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Looking thru the viewfinder More info | Sep 08, 2011 09:51 | #25 ToddR wrote in post #13069728 I'm still waiting for the general population to learn the word its, which is not interchangeable with it's. ![]() Your wishing fanciful dreams. ....the best camera is the one you have on you at the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ledhed Goldmember 1,929 posts Joined Aug 2005 Location: Apsley, On. CAN. More info | Sep 08, 2011 10:00 | #26 aperture. i've spelled this word wrong many times. Rob - "a photographer is a painter, in a hurry!"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alt4852 Goldmember 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | Sep 08, 2011 10:02 | #27 Its not futile, some people just need some guidance. Just because their not good at grammer and spelling doesn't mean there dumb or anything. Grammer in general isn't known for it's ability to be understood easily. Thats why so many people struggle with it. 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yourdoinitwrong Goldmember 2,394 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Indiana More info | A tack is sharp. Tact is getting your point across without pissing people off. 5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bagman Senior Member 273 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Toronto More info | Sep 08, 2011 10:18 | #29 yourdoinitwrong wrote in post #13069945 A tack is sharp. Tact is getting your point across without pissing people off. ![]() Why soooo seriousss....:p EOS 70D | Canon 70-200mm F4L IS | Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 XR Di II | 430EX II | Lowepro Nova 170AW & Slingshot 202AW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yourdoinitwrong Goldmember 2,394 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Indiana More info | Sep 08, 2011 10:21 | #30 Bagman wrote in post #13069989 Why soooo seriousss....:p Haha sorry, that wasn't pointed at anyone here. That is just a definition of tact that I have heard before. And I even used a smiley! 5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 470 guests, 156 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||