Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 12 Sep 2011 (Monday) 10:22
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Auto iso: why does my speedlight choose ISO400 ?

 
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 13, 2011 13:04 as a reply to  @ post 13096635 |  #16

WHY...

WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO?

ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me.

I am really asking this question because, perhaps there is something I have missed...


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,932 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2276
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Sep 13, 2011 13:07 |  #17

RPCrowe wrote in post #13096928 (external link)
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO?

ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me.

I am really asking this question because, perhaps there is something I have missed...

I don't think you've missed anything, at least in my opinion. If auto ISO was fully programmable I would use it, otherwise I don't shoot anything where I need the current implementation. I not saying others may have a use for it.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 13, 2011 13:57 |  #18

RPCrowe wrote in post #13096928 (external link)
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO?

ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me.

I am really asking this question because, perhaps there is something I have missed...

If I could pick shutter speed and f/stop, and the camera would then choose the right ISO to permit me to use that specific combination even as the light changed up or down in intensity, then Auto ISO capability has value...since I monitor camera choices for f/stop and shutter speed, even when I relinquish control of one of the settings, I have not totally given up creative control. Similarly, I would continue to monitor what the camera would choose for ISO value, and decide if it an acceptable value (to me) or not.

But since Auto ISO does not do what I described, it is of no current value at all to me.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Sep 13, 2011 14:21 |  #19

RPCrowe wrote in post #13096928 (external link)
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO? ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me.

For the same reason someone might want Av mode or Tv mode.

Aperture priority is really aperture and ISO priority. You let the camera choose the shutter speed.

Shutter priority is really shutter and ISO priority. You let the camera choose the aperture.

What's missing is an aperture and shutter priority mode, where the camera chooses the ISO.

I know what aperture I need for the DOF I want. I know what shutter speed I need to avoid motion blur. If I'm going to give the camera any control at all, I would rather have it choose the ISO than let it choose one of the other two variables.

ISO has less impact on image quality and is the only corner of the exposure triangle that doesn't affect DOF or motion blur.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emdzey01
Senior Member
349 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Sep 15, 2011 14:10 |  #20

Depends on your settings.

If you're on Av, Auto-ISO will work by adjusting your ISO to the LOWEST POSSIBLE while keeping your shutter speed to 1/focal length. For example; if you're zoomed in at 50mm, Auto-ISO will select the ISO that you need in order to keep your shutter speed at 1/60.

In Tv mode, Auto ISO will select the proper ISO that will still expose the camera correctly while the lens is wide open during darker conditions, and stopped down in brighter conditions.

If you're on M (Which i suspect that you are), Auto-ISO will automatically select ISO400 REGARDLESS OF EXPOSURE/METERING.

Also, please not that your camera meters the exposure WITHOUT the flash in the equation.

Auto ISO is a pretty useful function for those who knows how it works.


my name is mjay.

Click for my transactions as a seller on POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Sep 15, 2011 14:20 |  #21

emdzey01 wrote in post #13108665 (external link)
If you're on Av, Auto-ISO will work by adjusting your ISO to the LOWEST POSSIBLE while keeping your shutter speed to 1/focal length. For example; if you're zoomed in at 50mm, Auto-ISO will select the ISO that you need in order to keep your shutter speed at 1/60....Auto ISO is a pretty useful function for those who knows how it works.

If that first statement were true, I would not have seen this happen...

•in low light and f/4.5 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 0"4 and ISO value of 800...why the heck didn't it selected ISO 1600 or 3200 instead, permitting a more handholdable shutter speed?!

•in bright light and f/8 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 1/2000 and ISO value of 400...why the heck didn't it select 100 along with shutter speed of 1/500?!


What camera model do you have, which might account for why my 40D does not behave like your camera is described?! This 5DII owner describes its auto ISO as pretty simplistic in the ISO value chosen... https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=12494061&po​stcount=19


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sdipirro
Goldmember
Avatar
2,207 posts
Likes: 46
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 15, 2011 15:40 |  #22

Actually, I think several of the Canon bodies behave differently with auto ISO. The 1D4 allows me to use M mode, set the aperture and shutter speed, and it will float the ISO between 100-12,800 when NOT using a flash. I find this very useful when I'm shooting indoor sports, for example. I just have to watch out for bumping up against the ISO limit and underexposing the shot. But pop a flash onto the hotshoe, and auto ISO locks the ISO at 400. This seems like something that could be fixed in firmware. When shooting in ETTL, if the flash is at full power and still underexposed, it could float the ISO to get a proper exposure. And if it could do that, it could start at ISO 100 and work up from there the way it does when there's no flash on the hotshoe.


Cameras: 1DX, 1D4, 20D, 10D, S90, G2
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm, 16-35mm f2.8L II, 24-70mm f2.8L, 70-200mm f2.8L IS, 300mm f2.8L IS, 200mm f2L IS, 50mm f1.4, 50mm f1.2L, 85mm f1.2L, 1.4x TC, 2x TC, 500D macro, Zeiss 21mm
Lighting: 580EX, Elinchrom 600 RX's, D-Lite 4's, ABR800, 74" Eli Octa, 100cm/70cm DOs, Photoflex Medium Octa and reflectors, PW's, Lastolite Hilite, Newton Di400CR bracket

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
boerewors
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,948 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Sep 2009
Location: South African living in Indonesia
     
Sep 15, 2011 19:19 |  #23

sdipirro wrote in post #13109165 (external link)
Actually, I think several of the Canon bodies behave differently with auto ISO. The 1D4 allows me to use M mode, set the aperture and shutter speed, and it will float the ISO between 100-12,800 when NOT using a flash. I find this very useful when I'm shooting indoor sports, for example. I just have to watch out for bumping up against the ISO limit and underexposing the shot. But pop a flash onto the hotshoe, and auto ISO locks the ISO at 400. This seems like something that could be fixed in firmware. When shooting in ETTL, if the flash is at full power and still underexposed, it could float the ISO to get a proper exposure. And if it could do that, it could start at ISO 100 and work up from there the way it does when there's no flash on the hotshoe.

i agree with this statement about how it should be. ISO should only move up if the flash doesent have enough power to expose the shot. i think canon made ISO lock to 400 to save the batteries and make their speedlights seem better than what they really are


The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RPCrowe
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,331 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 2522
Joined Nov 2005
Location: San Diego County, California, USA
     
Sep 15, 2011 21:01 as a reply to  @ boerewors's post |  #24

I can vary the ISO

Using P, AV or TV mode, I can on my x0D and 7D cameras vary the ISO by simply moving my finger over to the ISO button and rotating the main dial with that same finger. It takes no time to do this and I see the ISO value in my viewfinder. I don't have to move my eye from the viewfinder.

I DON'T LIKE MY CAMERA SELECTING VALUES FOR ME....


See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug​.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FuzzyDuenkel
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: West Bend, WI
     
Apr 06, 2013 08:01 |  #25

I love Auto ISO for those times when I'm doing on-location ambient light shooting. I set the limits where I want and let the camera choose the ISO.

The 5DIII and 1Dx have the ability to set the lower limits of shutter speed way better than older cameras.

I liken it to this... Years ago a friend had the Konica T3 (I told you it was years ago!) That camera was an early adopter of auto exposure. I was skeptical but then he asked me how I adjust the exposure setting on my camera. I replied that I do what the in-camera meter tells me to do. He replied... My camera does that same thing for me... faster!

Same with Auto ISO... one less thing for me to have to mess with. Obviously there are times when I don't use it. But it's a handy feature to have.

BTW, I too wish that the flash wouldn't switch to ISO 400 when in Auto ISO. Annoying. I'd rather be able to use the Auto ISO feature with the limits I preset.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 06, 2013 08:19 |  #26

FuzzyDuenkel wrote in post #15796721 (external link)
I love Auto ISO for those times when I'm doing on-location ambient light shooting. I set the limits where I want and let the camera choose the ISO.

The 5DIII and 1Dx have the ability to set the lower limits of shutter speed way better than older cameras.

I am curious about how the 5DIII and 1Dx behave in low light and bright light conditions where my 40D would behave like this...

•in low light and f/4.5 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 0"4 and ISO value of 800...why the heck didn't it selected ISO 1600 or 3200 instead, permitting a more handholdable shutter speed?!

•in bright light (about Sunny 16 ambient) and f/8 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 1/2000 and ISO value of 400...why the heck didn't it select 100 along with shutter speed of 1/500?!

...which I complained about 1.5 years ago in this thread?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FuzzyDuenkel
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: West Bend, WI
     
Apr 06, 2013 08:25 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #27

Wilt, I'm hazy on the problem. Does your 40D give you the option to set the limits of shutter speeds, or can you set parameters on the available ISO range?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 06, 2013 08:40 |  #28

FuzzyDuenkel wrote in post #15796756 (external link)
Wilt, I'm hazy on the problem. Does your 40D give you the option to set the limits of shutter speeds, or can you set parameters on the available ISO range?

No the 40D provided zero control of range of shutter speed...the newer bodies are better in that regard. However the issues that I have with Auto ISO in the 40D are the 'less appropriate combinations' that it chose, not the selection of a 'bad shutter speed' per se. As my bulleted behaviors indicate

•in low light and f/4.5 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 0"4 and ISO value of 800...why the heck didn't it selected ISO 1600 or 3200 instead, permitting a more handholdable shutter speed?!

•in bright light (about Sunny 16 ambient) and f/8 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 1/2000 and ISO value of 400...why the heck didn't it select 100 along with shutter speed of 1/500?!

The issue:
In the first case, it had higher ISO values available, but some odd logic prevented it from choosing them.
In the second case, it has lower ISO values available, but some odd logic prevented it from choosing them.
So is the ISO selection logic any less impaired in the newer cameras?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FuzzyDuenkel
Hatchling
Avatar
7 posts
Joined Apr 2013
Location: West Bend, WI
     
Apr 06, 2013 08:51 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #29

I see. I was confused. So what you're saying is that it has two variables, and you didn't like the choice it made in favoring one over the other.

I know what you're saying. When I had an old Nikon FA, it had a P mode. If I shot in P mode, I didn't like that the camera would close down the aperture instead of speeding up the shutter speed.

I dunno. I don't know if a newer body would shift that bias toward hand-holdability. But I bypass that problem by setting the limits on the shutter speed.

Not to side-step your concern... but the new cameras are really superb! The 5DIII is their best value ever. It does everything it should and more (finally! The older 5D versions... not so much. The 1Dx is great too, but kind of pricey unless you need its features.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,473 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4577
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Apr 06, 2013 09:03 |  #30

FuzzyDuenkel wrote in post #15796803 (external link)
I dunno. I don't know if a newer body would shift that bias toward hand-holdability.

The issue is less about handholdability, but that it seems odd to constrain the range of ISO speeds available in Auto ISO, rather than permit the full range to be selected by the camera logic. I might understand high ISO noise being a consideration, but what explains why ISO 100 and 200 are outside the selectable range of the Auto ISO logic?

It is analogous to setting a fixed ISO and choose Tv (auto aperture) mode with shutter set at 1/100, and the lens aperture is somehow constrained (with a f/2 through f/16 lens aperture range) to only select from f/2.8 through f/11 ...neither the fastest aperture nor the slowest aperture are available. One might speculate that the logic is "f/16 has diffraction considerations, f/2 wide open similarly has less detail resolution, so don't let those apertures be available" in Auto Aperture mode?!

So are the newer cameras any less brain dead in this regard (contraining the range of Auto ISO to less than the full range of ISO which can be set manually)?


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,202 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Auto iso: why does my speedlight choose ISO400 ?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1758 guests, 104 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.