WHY...
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO?
ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me.
I am really asking this question because, perhaps there is something I have missed...
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info | WHY... See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | Sep 13, 2011 13:07 | #17 RPCrowe wrote in post #13096928 WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO? ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me. I am really asking this question because, perhaps there is something I have missed... I don't think you've missed anything, at least in my opinion. If auto ISO was fully programmable I would use it, otherwise I don't shoot anything where I need the current implementation. I not saying others may have a use for it. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Sep 13, 2011 13:57 | #18 RPCrowe wrote in post #13096928 WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO? ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me. I am really asking this question because, perhaps there is something I have missed... If I could pick shutter speed and f/stop, and the camera would then choose the right ISO to permit me to use that specific combination even as the light changed up or down in intensity, then Auto ISO capability has value...since I monitor camera choices for f/stop and shutter speed, even when I relinquish control of one of the settings, I have not totally given up creative control. Similarly, I would continue to monitor what the camera would choose for ISO value, and decide if it an acceptable value (to me) or not. You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CurtisN Master Flasher 19,129 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2005 Location: Northern Illinois, US More info | Sep 13, 2011 14:21 | #19 RPCrowe wrote in post #13096928 WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE USE AUTO-ISO? ISO, is the one variable that I would want to control not let the camera control it for me. For the same reason someone might want Av mode or Tv mode. "If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
LOG IN TO REPLY |
emdzey01 Senior Member 349 posts Likes: 1 Joined Apr 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Sep 15, 2011 14:10 | #20 Depends on your settings. my name is mjay.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Sep 15, 2011 14:20 | #21 emdzey01 wrote in post #13108665 If you're on Av, Auto-ISO will work by adjusting your ISO to the LOWEST POSSIBLE while keeping your shutter speed to 1/focal length. For example; if you're zoomed in at 50mm, Auto-ISO will select the ISO that you need in order to keep your shutter speed at 1/60....Auto ISO is a pretty useful function for those who knows how it works. If that first statement were true, I would not have seen this happen... You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sdipirro Goldmember 2,207 posts Likes: 46 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Sep 15, 2011 15:40 | #22 Actually, I think several of the Canon bodies behave differently with auto ISO. The 1D4 allows me to use M mode, set the aperture and shutter speed, and it will float the ISO between 100-12,800 when NOT using a flash. I find this very useful when I'm shooting indoor sports, for example. I just have to watch out for bumping up against the ISO limit and underexposing the shot. But pop a flash onto the hotshoe, and auto ISO locks the ISO at 400. This seems like something that could be fixed in firmware. When shooting in ETTL, if the flash is at full power and still underexposed, it could float the ISO to get a proper exposure. And if it could do that, it could start at ISO 100 and work up from there the way it does when there's no flash on the hotshoe. Cameras: 1DX, 1D4, 20D, 10D, S90, G2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boerewors THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,948 posts Likes: 4 Joined Sep 2009 Location: South African living in Indonesia More info | Sep 15, 2011 19:19 | #23 sdipirro wrote in post #13109165 Actually, I think several of the Canon bodies behave differently with auto ISO. The 1D4 allows me to use M mode, set the aperture and shutter speed, and it will float the ISO between 100-12,800 when NOT using a flash. I find this very useful when I'm shooting indoor sports, for example. I just have to watch out for bumping up against the ISO limit and underexposing the shot. But pop a flash onto the hotshoe, and auto ISO locks the ISO at 400. This seems like something that could be fixed in firmware. When shooting in ETTL, if the flash is at full power and still underexposed, it could float the ISO to get a proper exposure. And if it could do that, it could start at ISO 100 and work up from there the way it does when there's no flash on the hotshoe. i agree with this statement about how it should be. ISO should only move up if the flash doesent have enough power to expose the shot. i think canon made ISO lock to 400 to save the batteries and make their speedlights seem better than what they really are The most important piece of gear you own, resides in your head and its called your brain.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RPCrowe Cream of the Crop More info | I can vary the ISO See my images at http://rpcrowe.smugmug.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuzzyDuenkel Hatchling 7 posts Joined Apr 2013 Location: West Bend, WI More info | Apr 06, 2013 08:01 | #25 I love Auto ISO for those times when I'm doing on-location ambient light shooting. I set the limits where I want and let the camera choose the ISO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Apr 06, 2013 08:19 | #26 FuzzyDuenkel wrote in post #15796721 I love Auto ISO for those times when I'm doing on-location ambient light shooting. I set the limits where I want and let the camera choose the ISO. The 5DIII and 1Dx have the ability to set the lower limits of shutter speed way better than older cameras. I am curious about how the 5DIII and 1Dx behave in low light and bright light conditions where my 40D would behave like this... You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuzzyDuenkel Hatchling 7 posts Joined Apr 2013 Location: West Bend, WI More info | Wilt, I'm hazy on the problem. Does your 40D give you the option to set the limits of shutter speeds, or can you set parameters on the available ISO range?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Apr 06, 2013 08:40 | #28 FuzzyDuenkel wrote in post #15796756 Wilt, I'm hazy on the problem. Does your 40D give you the option to set the limits of shutter speeds, or can you set parameters on the available ISO range? No the 40D provided zero control of range of shutter speed...the newer bodies are better in that regard. However the issues that I have with Auto ISO in the 40D are the 'less appropriate combinations' that it chose, not the selection of a 'bad shutter speed' per se. As my bulleted behaviors indicate •in low light and f/4.5 in Av mode it suggests shutter of 0"4 and ISO value of 800...why the heck didn't it selected ISO 1600 or 3200 instead, permitting a more handholdable shutter speed?! The issue: You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FuzzyDuenkel Hatchling 7 posts Joined Apr 2013 Location: West Bend, WI More info | I see. I was confused. So what you're saying is that it has two variables, and you didn't like the choice it made in favoring one over the other.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | Apr 06, 2013 09:03 | #30 FuzzyDuenkel wrote in post #15796803 I dunno. I don't know if a newer body would shift that bias toward hand-holdability. The issue is less about handholdability, but that it seems odd to constrain the range of ISO speeds available in Auto ISO, rather than permit the full range to be selected by the camera logic. I might understand high ISO noise being a consideration, but what explains why ISO 100 and 200 are outside the selectable range of the Auto ISO logic? You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1758 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||