I have 63 photos from this wedding up on my blog
. Here are my fav 8..
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
CTP Senior Member 353 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Northern Illinois More info | Sep 13, 2011 21:08 | #1 EOS R + 5D4, 16-35L II, 24L TS-E II, 24L II, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, RF 28-70L, 580ex IIx2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | Sep 13, 2011 21:13 | #2 Nice venues. I like the photos. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2011 21:13 | #3 Your clients should be very happy. Only one I don't love is the rings in the flower. Nice work. Ann Robinson
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 13, 2011 21:18 | #4 karobinson wrote in post #13099235 Your clients should be very happy. Only one I don't love is the rings in the flower. Nice work. Can you point me in a direction why? EOS R + 5D4, 16-35L II, 24L TS-E II, 24L II, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, RF 28-70L, 580ex IIx2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Here's my take...you know...aka the prick wolf.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MissCJ Member 126 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Canada More info | Sep 14, 2011 00:01 | #6 #5 is a winner for sure. Something about how the Bride's ring in #7 (how its facing upward) almost seems to make it lose detail IMO. Canon 5DMK2>24-105mm f4L>70-200mm f4L>50mm 1.4>430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 14, 2011 07:39 | #7 S.Horton wrote in post #13099234 Nice venues. I like the photos. Thanks, they were all my idea. Not. The reception venue is a 130 acre property with a 4,000 sq ft, lime stone Bed and Breakfast on it as well. I am one of the preferred vendors there so I get to shoot a few wedding there every year. nicksan wrote in post #13099389 Here's my take...you know...aka the prick wolf. ![]() 1. I think this is a standard issue hair/mirror shot. Solid shot. 2. I'm trying to figure out how the person in foreground fits in because I'm pretty sure none of the 2 hands are his/hers. 3. Nice! Love the use of TSE on this one. Love the conversion too. 4. Not liking the TSE on this one because the right most guy's head is being affected by it. Otherwise a good shot. 5. I like the shot but not liking the processing, but that's just personal taste. I just don't like this type processing too much. 6. I like this shot but not sure if the TSE was necessary? Again, personal taste but I think the structure offers some interest and would have been better if it was in focus, at least to me. Also, he looks kind of awkard like maybe he didn't want to crush the bouquet? 7. I actually like this ring shot. Nothing spectacular but does the job solidly IMO. 8. I would have liked to have seen her face a little more but I like the composition, the people in the background, the interior details, etc. Where do I start? Did someone piss in your cheerios this morning or did I come over and kick your dog and not remember it? I mean seriously, how could you be so mean spirited and such a dick to say things that are so correct, it made me go back and look at some of the photos I took #3 Come on, you know you hate this photo so just tell me, I already think you are smug little troll ![]() #4 This is the one shot I wish I could do over, for the exact reason you said. #5 Good try in hiding your hate for me behind "personal taste". #6 Awkward is a good term, I think it happened because of the hill they were standing on and it was the first time he was taller than his wife. #7 Kinda cliche and over used but solid. Agree. #8 Thats how I took this shot, I set up the composition and held my spot for about for a minute and just shot. I refuse to coach any couple in a situation as important to them as the first dance, I would rather go into the background and take my chances. Seriously though, why cant couples pose themselves better without our help? **disclaimer. I was poking fun at the people who think Nick's C&C is him being a dick or a prick or anything else. You people are ridiculous. Period. The feedback photogs get here is legit and different than your friends patting you on the back on facebook page. Get over it, take the boxing gloves off and rather than fight back, try and understand WHY someone choose to say what they did. You may not like the delivery of the C&C but if you fight it, you might as well just go along your happy life in facebook world thinking you deserve to be lead photographer for Modern Bride and just barely missed out on being the photog for the Royal Wedding becuase of bad timing. MissCJ wrote in post #13100238 #5 is a winner for sure. Something about how the Bride's ring in #7 (how its facing upward) almost seems to make it lose detail IMO. Hmm sort of like you can not the facets as much? I did desaturate the ring some to get rid of the blue in it (from the sky behind me) I wonder if it that is it. EOS R + 5D4, 16-35L II, 24L TS-E II, 24L II, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, RF 28-70L, 580ex IIx2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 14, 2011 09:31 | #8 I can not add anything else that the smug little troll did not *LOL*. The critique was right on
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Sep 14, 2011 09:54 | #9 CTP wrote in post #13101156 Where do I start? Did someone piss in your cheerios this morning or did I come over and kick your dog and not remember it? I mean seriously, how could you be so mean spirited and such a dick to say things that are so correct, it made me go back and look at some of the photos I took ![]() Man, that would be a good day actually. BTW, I don't have a dog. I have 3 cats. CTP wrote in post #13101156 **disclaimer. I was poking fun at the people who think Nick's C&C is him being a dick or a prick or anything else. You people are ridiculous. Period. The feedback photogs get here is legit and different than your friends patting you on the back on facebook page. Get over it, take the boxing gloves off and rather than fight back, try and understand WHY someone choose to say what they did. You may not like the delivery of the C&C but if you fight it, you might as well just go along your happy life in facebook world thinking you deserve to be lead photographer for Modern Bride and just barely missed out on being the photog for the Royal Wedding becuase of bad timing. Nice! scorpio_e wrote in post #13101678 I can not add anything else that the smug little troll did not *LOL*. The critique was right on ![]() Damn, I'm beginning to think these are backhanded insults to this smug little troll...I mean, I am smug. I am little at 5'6". As for troll...well...I don't know.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
XxxStormyxxX Member 180 posts Joined Jun 2011 Location: Los Angeles More info | Sep 14, 2011 09:56 | #10 These are nice! "A closed mouth gathers no foot"
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wilky87 Member 130 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Stockton-on-Tees More info | Sep 14, 2011 12:11 | #11 Is the TSE you refer to the blur? Also is it done just using a sharpness brush in LR3? flickR
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Sep 14, 2011 12:18 | #12 wilky87 wrote in post #13102545 Is the TSE you refer to the blur? Also is it done just using a sharpness brush in LR3? Tilt Shift Effect. Yes, the Blur. I believe he has a Tilt Shift lens so not done in post.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 14, 2011 12:28 | #13 wilky87 wrote in post #13102545 Is the TSE you refer to the blur? Also is it done just using a sharpness brush in LR3? TS-E Lens, I have the 24II. Before I bought the lens I have played around using LR and Photoshop and while it is better than nothing, I have never seen a photo that had the TS-E applied in post that the same as using the lens itself. EOS R + 5D4, 16-35L II, 24L TS-E II, 24L II, 50L, 85L II, 100L, 135L, 70-200L 2.8 IS II, RF 28-70L, 580ex IIx2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
albertaskater Senior Member 347 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Calgary, Alberta More info | Sep 18, 2011 23:30 | #14 I love the TSE in 3, but wish it was straightened a bit to the right. I envision marbles rolling to the left across the sloping floor, lol. Erika
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1232 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||