amfoto1 wrote in post #13111715
Too bad it didn't have a "protection" filter on it. I'm sure that would have saved the lens.
Too bad it didn't have a "protection" filter on it. I'm sure that would have saved the lens.
LMAO!!
UV filter FTW!
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Sep 16, 2011 14:15 | #16 amfoto1 wrote in post #13111715 Too bad it didn't have a "protection" filter on it. I'm sure that would have saved the lens. LMAO!! My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Well with the filter and the lens hood together you would have a complete lens still.... EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments  More info | Sep 16, 2011 14:35 | #18 If they registered it, then they will get a call. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles*  10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Sep 16, 2011 14:46 | #19 Buy a new lens - $900 +/- La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bagman Senior Member  273 posts Likes: 5 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Toronto More info | Sep 16, 2011 15:06 | #20 The 50 f1.8 would have fluttered to the ground unscathed, becuase it is so light and its lens hood would be its parachute! EOS 70D | Canon 70-200mm F4L IS | Tamron 17-50mm F2.8 XR Di II | 430EX II | Lowepro Nova 170AW & Slingshot 202AW
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Sep 16, 2011 15:14 | #21 Bagman wrote in post #13114580 The 50 f1.8 would have fluttered to the ground unscathed, becuase it is so light and its lens hood would be its parachute! Or just made a gentle "POOF" as it vaporized on the shingles... La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments More info | Sep 16, 2011 15:33 | #22 I'm thinking now that the former owner of that lens became unhappy after comparing it to a 24-70L, tossed it overboard, and is out shopping right now. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MOkoFOko nut impotent and avoiding Geoff  19,889 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Michigan More info | Sep 16, 2011 15:35 | #23 Amusing, but not for the home owner
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vegasboy Goldmember  2,366 posts Likes: 47 Joined Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA More info | Sep 16, 2011 15:37 | #24 hilarious -Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cacawcacaw Goldmember  2,862 posts Likes: 19 Joined May 2010 Location: Ventura, California More info | Sep 16, 2011 16:29 | #25 I like the quote of $5,000 in damage to roof's eave. I guess they're figuring about $1,000 in materials and two laborers working together for a month to repair the four inch hole. Replacing my Canon 7D, Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 17-55mm, Sigma 30mm f/1.4, 85mm f/1.4, and 150-500mm with a Panasonic Lumix FZ1000. I still have the 17-55 and the 30 available for sale.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Evan Goldmember  1,327 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Oregon More info | Sep 16, 2011 20:48 | #26 cacawcacaw wrote in post #13115063 I like the quote of $5,000 in damage to roof's eave. I guess they're figuring about $1,000 in materials and two laborers working together for a month to repair the four inch hole. yeh, doesn't look like $5K worth of damage to me. That would take me about two days to fix by myself...wish two days was $5k worth of labor or I would be making the big bucks --
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DoubleNegative *sniffles* 10,533 posts Likes: 11 Joined Mar 2006 Location: New York, USA More info | Sep 16, 2011 20:59 | #27 I would just jam a soffit vent in the bottom hole and staple a new shingle on top! La Vida Leica!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
scpictaker Goldmember  1,389 posts Likes: 11 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Edgerton Wis More info | Sep 16, 2011 21:15 | #28 Just saw it on CNN, actually looks pretty good for that kind of fall!! LOL My Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
A5forfighting Senior Member 626 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2008 Location: San Diego More info | Sep 16, 2011 23:10 | #29 once the Prints are lined up The FAA will be all over them, Plus the loss of the lens 7D, S95, EOSM,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Charliephoto Member 87 posts Joined Jul 2008 Location: Ont.,Canada More info | Sep 17, 2011 07:41 | #30 amfoto1 wrote in post #13111715 Too bad it didn't have a "protection" filter on it. I'm sure that would have saved the lens. That`s true , it might have faired better, since the lens hood did not help
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ahmed0essam 1615 guests, 167 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
