.... I love that lens, it's sticked on my bodies 1DMKIII, 5DMKII or 50D ... but I am not sure, it is a good idea to take and go with such lens.
AF is one of the most accurate of the market and as fast as any lenses (at least 135L2.0 or 300L2.8 I own) but photographs need to really be trained to focus properly with such thin DOF. Don't forget that autofocus is made @F1.2 even if you shoot @f2.8, that lens is ultra sharp and so even when closed @f2.8 you will see users error (missed focused).
-> Are you sure to be able to keep one AF point on eyes of moving subjects for a few seconds ?
-> Are you sure you are skilled enough to change AF point while shooting fast enough (with 5DMKII center and upper points are really accurate) ?
-> Are you sure you can change aperture while shooting to get appropriate DOF to get both eyes sharp or full body (hands, head, guitar) in DOF
-> Are you sure to know how flare is working with such lens (front glass is really curved and huged) ?
-> Are you sure you will understand how AF is working, because it's totally non linear focusing (a huge difference between 1 to around 3 meters and 3 meters to infinite) ?
-> Are you sure you know the apertures were there are more CA with 85L and what is the curve of CA/aperture ? you can guess that with metallic/chrome instruments or stands -> CA can be really annoying on pictures.
With 5DMKII it's probably the most tricky to shot with 85L (1D and 50D are easier)
It took me months to learn how to point and keep tracking properly moving subjects even if I was trained for years with FD85L1.2 then 135L2.0/300L2.8.
I am not sure sigma is really accurate to focus and track at all.. Action pictures are so rare, that I doubt it can really be as accurate as 85L.
So probably 85F1.8 or 70-200L2.8ISII would be easier and less risky.