The High fstop or lower Fstop?
You should be able to tell...
Coconuts DoF
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/66620096@N02/6166489651/
Coconuts
SouthFlorida_Tron Senior Member 596 posts Joined Jul 2011 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL More info | Sep 20, 2011 22:16 | #1 The High fstop or lower Fstop? Coconuts DoF IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/66620096@N02/6166489651/ Coconuts < Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vk2gwk Cream of the Crop 13,360 posts Gallery: 332 photos Likes: 1836 Joined Jun 2009 Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia More info | Sep 20, 2011 22:32 | #2 I like the bottom one best because of the deeper depth of field. My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | Sep 20, 2011 22:34 | #3 ^^^ Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
horsik Member 116 posts Joined Aug 2011 More info | Sep 21, 2011 04:54 | #4 Second one for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Staszek Goldmember 3,606 posts Likes: 4 Joined Mar 2010 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Sep 21, 2011 05:21 | #5 I like the first one (shallower DOF) for the "implied" depth. Different strokes for different folks! SOSKIphoto
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SmilingFox Senior Member 375 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Conroe, TX More info | Sep 21, 2011 18:14 | #6 I like more DOF here. Canon T1i Nifty 50, 35-135 f4-5.6, 70-200 f4, 580, 2x 430s, and a super long Ettl cord
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MommaBird80 Senior Member 345 posts Joined Jul 2010 Location: Pittsburgh, PA More info | Sep 21, 2011 18:43 | #7 down at the english fair Canon 7D - XSi 450D gripped/ EF 50mm f/1.4 / Tamron - AF 28-75/2.8 XR/ 85 1.8 USM/ 380EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Sep 21, 2011 18:47 | #8 Dat's a lotta coconuts - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SouthFlorida_Tron THREAD STARTER Senior Member 596 posts Joined Jul 2011 Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL More info | Ya I couldn't resist this shot..... Found this behind the food shack at the beach in San Juan < Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SylvesterXxX Goldmember 3,508 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: N.W. London More info | Sep 22, 2011 05:36 | #10 |
Drixar Senior Member 253 posts Joined Jul 2011 Location: Essex, England More info | Sep 22, 2011 08:22 | #11 honestly i prefer the first one i think it draws you in more than the second although if you crop a little off the bottom so theres not as big an area of DoF/out of focus (whatever the techy term is) Canon 400D(Rebel XTi) | 15-55mm kit lens | 50mm 1.8 MII |Raynox 250 macro conversion | Cheap Extension Tubes | 55-250 IS II.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonC Senior Member 760 posts Joined Dec 2010 Location: Solvang, California More info | Sep 22, 2011 10:47 | #12 I don't think a shallow depth of field helps unless you have something you want to emphasize. In this case, there isn't anything in the center on which you want to focus, so I would go with #2. Canon 7D | EF 24-105L | EF 70-300 | EF 400 5.6L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1182 guests, 188 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||