Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 21 Sep 2011 (Wednesday) 01:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Few from my 2nd wedding!

 
majin ­ tcz
Member
115 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
Sep 21, 2011 01:25 |  #1

IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1214-2.jpg
IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1239-2-1.jpg
IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1255-3.jpg
IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1421.jpg
IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1496-2.jpg
IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1610-2.jpg
IMAGE: http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo331/tcaesaleo/LindseyandOnosWedding8-13-11-1730.jpg

Fuji XT-2 | 10-24 F4 R OIS | 35 F2 R WR
http://tcainphotograph​y.com (external link)
http://tcainphotograph​y.wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
p27rpy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,418 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Oct 2010
     
Sep 21, 2011 11:28 |  #2

1, 4 and 6 would be very nice, but it seems that you missed the focus (especially in #6, which would have been a great shot).

in #3, try not to cut off your subject's head.

If the focus wasn't an issue, they'd be nice images!


Theo Civitello - Houston Based Automotive, Wedding & Life Photography (external link)
Flickr (external link)
My Blog - Latest uploads and detailed Strobist info! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bryan ­ Grant ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: denver
     
Sep 21, 2011 11:42 |  #3

the focus one and 6 is really off. im not sure your intent on 6 what are we suposed to be looking at


"canon---- there is no substitute"
Website: Pixil studio Denver photographer (external link)
My photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kartoon2005
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: NYC
     
Sep 21, 2011 12:27 as a reply to  @ Bryan Grant Photography's post |  #4

Not a fan of black and white wedding pictures. They look okay except for the ones that are out of focus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
majin ­ tcz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
115 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
     
Sep 21, 2011 23:47 |  #5

For some reason they are showing up out of focus on here. They are sharp on the prints I had done for the client. I'll figure it out. Thanks for the comments!


Fuji XT-2 | 10-24 F4 R OIS | 35 F2 R WR
http://tcainphotograph​y.com (external link)
http://tcainphotograph​y.wordpress.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bryan ­ Grant ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,090 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: denver
     
Sep 21, 2011 23:51 |  #6

majin tcz wrote in post #13143173 (external link)
For some reason they are showing up out of focus on here. They are sharp on the prints I had done for the client. I'll figure it out. Thanks for the comments!

i dont believe that is the case for #6 i can see by the lights on the ceiling that the focus is behind the bride


"canon---- there is no substitute"
Website: Pixil studio Denver photographer (external link)
My photography Blog (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevitivity
Member
Avatar
152 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Pasadena CA
     
Sep 22, 2011 03:48 |  #7

Great shots. Don't sweat issues only another photographer would recognize. Trust me!



Blog  (external link)| Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kbowers
Member
103 posts
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
     
Sep 22, 2011 07:31 |  #8

Bryan Grant Photography wrote in post #13143182 (external link)
i dont believe that is the case for #6 i can see by the lights on the ceiling that the focus is behind the bride

Yea... there is no way that #6 has the bride and groom in focus on print. They are a blurry mess.


Canon 7D | Rebel XT
∑ 17-50 f/2.8 OS | 50mm f/1.4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
p27rpy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,418 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Oct 2010
     
Sep 22, 2011 16:38 |  #9

majin tcz wrote in post #13143173 (external link)
For some reason they are showing up out of focus on here. They are sharp on the prints I had done for the client. I'll figure it out. Thanks for the comments!

wait, what? on #1 the focus seems to very sharp on the back of her teeth and earring, and #6 is just completely missed...there's no way the upload messed that one up, lol.


Theo Civitello - Houston Based Automotive, Wedding & Life Photography (external link)
Flickr (external link)
My Blog - Latest uploads and detailed Strobist info! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jerefish
Goldmember
Avatar
1,003 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Canton, MI
     
Sep 23, 2011 11:13 |  #10

kartoon2005 wrote in post #13139696 (external link)
Not a fan of black and white wedding pictures.

Um...what? :confused: That's like an industry standard for timelessness photos. If there was ever a genre of photos that fit within the black and white constraints it’s weddings…now I agree not every image should be black and white.


Jeremy or jfish works
Canon 7d | 70-200 F/4 L
| 28-70mm f/2.8 L
Flickr (external link) | Website (external link) | Julianne Grace 365

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nicksan
Man I Like to Fart
Avatar
24,738 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Oct 2006
Location: NYC
     
Sep 23, 2011 11:25 |  #11

Here's my take:

1. Looks OOF. As other have pointed out her earrings look to be in focus more than her eyes. The lighting could be better, but otherwise I think this is a decent enough photo.
2. I am not too crazy about her expression here. There's a lot of distracting elements in the background too. I would clone out whatever it is on the lower right.
3. Not feeling it. Might be that it's framed too tightly. Are you showcasing the veil, the dress, the tattoos? Not really sure based on how it's framed.
4. Nice shot.
5. Not really all that crazy about the angle. Maybe it would have been better if shot straight down the stairs to accentuate the dress?
6. This one is simpley OOF. I would have trashed it.
7. Decent shot, although perhaps slightly underexposed.


While agree that B/W has its place, IMHO, some of these photos would look better in color, like #4 and #7. These are all B/W and it gets tiring after a while. Also, B/W is sometime used as a last resort for photos that have nasty color balances, blown out highlights, and other inperfections. Not saying this is the case here, but just saying. In fact, I do that sometime as well! :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ultimachi
Senior Member
Avatar
836 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Sep 23, 2011 11:49 as a reply to  @ nicksan's post |  #12

majin tcz wrote in post #13143173 (external link)
For some reason they are showing up out of focus on here. They are sharp on the prints I had done for the client. I'll figure it out. Thanks for the comments!

C'mon. You can't honestly believe that you're going to squeeze that by a forum full of photographers. Printing will never ever cause the point of focus to change. :D


*Wedding/Portraits Facebook Page* (external link) *Wedding/Portraits Blog* (external link) *Automotive Facebook Page* (external link) *Automotive Photography Blog* (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jerefish
Goldmember
Avatar
1,003 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Canton, MI
     
Sep 23, 2011 12:53 |  #13

ultimachi wrote in post #13151258 (external link)
C'mon. You can't honestly believe that you're going to squeeze that by a forum full of photographers. Printing will never ever cause the point of focus to change. :D

He did put them in photobucket. I've see that sometime mess with the photos...but it does seem odd.


Jeremy or jfish works
Canon 7d | 70-200 F/4 L
| 28-70mm f/2.8 L
Flickr (external link) | Website (external link) | Julianne Grace 365

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
albertaskater
Senior Member
347 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
     
Sep 23, 2011 22:13 |  #14

I would be mortified as a bride to have my jubbly bubblies hanging out like that... Just very unflattering. I dunno why in some shots she looks lean and in others, quite pudgy. Angles, wide angles?

Photo bucket does soften my images, I never did flickr, but yeah... The 2nd last one, no way is usable. Sorry.


Erika
7D, 350D, 18-55 XT kit, 18-135 IS, 50 1.4, 70-200 f/2.8L non IS, 430 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,226 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Few from my 2nd wedding!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1017 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.