Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 23 Sep 2011 (Friday) 07:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need some ND filter advice.

 
MattD
Senior Member
Avatar
944 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Norwich UK
     
Sep 23, 2011 07:11 |  #1

Hi Guys,

thinking about getting myself an ND filter kit... something like this one (external link)

But im a little lost, Iv read a few things about venyetting if I get the wrong type etc. Can anyone confirm this?

BTW, im a 5dmk2 user and the filters would be used on a 17-40L and a 24mm prime. Both are 77mm lenses.


Flickr (external link).
500PX (external link)
Twitter (external link)
Tumblr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RAH1861
Senior Member
330 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 23, 2011 07:24 |  #2

That kit gives you a good set of ND filters and is a good bang for the bucks. You might experience some vignetting with the 17-40 at the wide end. Maybe not. However, Cokin makes a wide-angle holder specifically for this problem:

http://www.adorama.com​/CKBPPW.html (external link)

I couldn't find it on that Cameraworld website you linked to, but you should be able to buy it elsewhere in the UK, I should think. I have tried the holder on ultra-wide lenses (for example, a full-frame equivalent of 18mm) and had no vignetting. Note that you cannot stack the filters, but with that kit you have a good selection without resorting to stacking anyway.

I think Cokin products are hard to find nowadays because I think they were recently bought by some other company. But after awhile it seems their products will be more readily available.


Rich
Canon 80D; 60D; SL1; Canon 60mm; Canon 400mm f5.6L; Canon 1.4 II teleconverter; Canon 10-18 STM; Canon 55-250 STM; Tokina 12-24; Sigma 17-50; Sigma 17-70; Sigma 18-250; Bower 35mm; Tamron 70-300; Pro-Optic 8mm fisheye

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Sep 23, 2011 07:32 |  #3

first, its a GND (graduated set) rather than ND Neutral density set. I know the website also calls it Nd, adding graduated later. Second, you do not want the P size for your set up, you need the Z size for the 17-40 on 5d2. third, Cokin filter quality is not that great with a stronger Magenta cast. If you are a stickler about image quality, look at Lee filters or the cheaper Hitech filters. fourth, the ND2, or one stop is pretty much useless. I would start out with just a 2 stop soft GND, and see how things work out. good luck.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattD
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
944 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Norwich UK
     
Sep 23, 2011 08:05 |  #4

cheers for the advice guys, plenty helpfull!


Flickr (external link).
500PX (external link)
Twitter (external link)
Tumblr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MCAsan
Goldmember
Avatar
3,918 posts
Likes: 88
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Sep 23, 2011 08:05 as a reply to  @ kevindar's post |  #5

I use a different approach. I take a bracketed pair of shots and merge them in PSE or PS5 so that my final image had the full range of light. If I were to use a GND, I would be not capture the full range of light. Depending on the scene I might take 3 or more shots with the intent of putting them together in HDR Efex Pro. That product lets you select the way the final image looks....from heavy grunge...to smooth transitions.

I do use a VND for shooting moving water. The VND lets me dial in just enough loss to smooth out the water.

So in my bag, CPL and VND are the only filters I routinely carry. But, that is my approach. Each to his/her own. ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RAH1861
Senior Member
330 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 23, 2011 08:10 |  #6

kevindar wrote in post #13150082 (external link)
first, its a GND (graduated set) rather than ND Neutral density set. I know the website also calls it Nd, adding graduated later. Second, you do not want the P size for your set up, you need the Z size for the 17-40 on 5d2.

Yes, as you say, the kit has graduated filters. He doesn't say if that is what he is looking for or not, but you do need to be careful with this stuff. :)

I'm wondering why you think that the Cokin P system will not work with a lens with a 77mm diameter. Their specs say it should work with "48mm-82mm filter sizes." I know that 77 is getting pretty close to that limit, but I have used the A system with lenses that are pushing its limit and not had a problem. I just recently acquired a Tokina 12-24 lens that has a 77mm diameter and was hoping to use my Cokin P system with it, so I have a good reason for asking!


Rich
Canon 80D; 60D; SL1; Canon 60mm; Canon 400mm f5.6L; Canon 1.4 II teleconverter; Canon 10-18 STM; Canon 55-250 STM; Tokina 12-24; Sigma 17-50; Sigma 17-70; Sigma 18-250; Bower 35mm; Tamron 70-300; Pro-Optic 8mm fisheye

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kevindar
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,050 posts
Likes: 38
Joined May 2007
Location: california
     
Sep 23, 2011 08:16 |  #7

5d2, 17mm, p system = severe vignetting/blocking.


My Flickr (external link)
Gear List
https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1205576

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Sep 23, 2011 08:18 |  #8

kevindar wrote in post #13150246 (external link)
5d2, 17mm, p system = severe vignetting/blocking.

I use the P system with my 10-22, no severe vignetting.

However, I do agree it is better to go for a larger system.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11004
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Sep 23, 2011 11:43 |  #9

kevindar wrote in post #13150082 (external link)
third, Cokin filter quality is not that great with a stronger Magenta cast. If you are a stickler about image quality, look at Lee filters or the cheaper Hitech filters.

I tried a Hitech ND last year, and even though the helpful folks at 2filter said it would be color neutral, I got an unacceptable-to-me magenta color cast. I can only imagine how poorly the cheaper Cokin filters would perform. To my knowledge Lee and Singh Ray are the only mfgrs that make truly-neutral nd and gnd resin filters. They're really expensive (Singh Ray) or difficult to find in-stock (Lee), but they are very reliable. I am not enthused about putting a cheap color-casting filter over my expensive lenses, so I prefer to either use none or use the best. In my view there is no place for low or medium quality filters.

The 4"x6" size is also preferred, not only to adequately cover the wide-angle lenses (like 17mm), but also provides ample surface area for handling.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
al ­ heeley
Senior Member
271 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 26, 2011 10:38 |  #10

Can I ask fro recommendation on ND filter strength? I've read the sticky post, guide to ND filters but still unsure what strength to get. I want a 58mm for the 18 - 55 kit lens, to get good silky blur effect on water - rivers, waterfalls, beaches. I'm assuming I need to go up to 4 or 6 seconds exposure max to get a good blur?
So if I'm typically looking at 1/125 at F8 for example, I'm going to need a 9 stop filter to get it dark enough to allow 4 second exposure - right? Do they sell 9 stop ND filters? What's the most popular number of stops for waterfalls and (subdued lighting) beaches?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Sep 26, 2011 11:04 |  #11

al heeley wrote in post #13165075 (external link)
Can I ask fro recommendation on ND filter strength? I've read the sticky post, guide to ND filters but still unsure what strength to get. I want a 58mm for the 18 - 55 kit lens, to get good silky blur effect on water - rivers, waterfalls, beaches. I'm assuming I need to go up to 4 or 6 seconds exposure max to get a good blur?
So if I'm typically looking at 1/125 at F8 for example, I'm going to need a 9 stop filter to get it dark enough to allow 4 second exposure - right? Do they sell 9 stop ND filters? What's the most popular number of stops for waterfalls and (subdued lighting) beaches?

You can get water motion blur from about 1/30 on... and at much over 2 second it can look more like fog than water, depending upon how fast it's moving, but that might be what you are looking to achieve.

Consider using several weaker filters, so you have some control over it. With several filters of different strengths, you can either use them singly or stack two or more to increase the loss of light, meeting more different situatiosn.

There are also variable ND filters, that work a lot like a polarizer... you turn them to increase the strength of the filter. They range between 2 and 8 stops of light. Here's an example (external link) (I haven't used so can't say anything about quality... there are much more expensive ones, too.)

The really strong filters are often used by videographers, might be overkill for you, and could be too strong in anything less than high sun. Video is limited to an effective shutter speed of around 1/50, so often relatively strong ND filters are necessary if they're going for a shallow DOF effect in daylight.

Depending upon the scene you are shooting, you also might want to use in combination with a Circular Polarizer, which loses up to 1.3 stops itself. Take that into consideration.

Someone mentions color casts, and yes that's a concern with cheaper filters. However, it's also often easily fixed either in post processing or by setting a custom white balance at the time you are shooting.

I use the Cokin P system for some things... It's good for rarely used filters that you don't want to spend a lot of money on, or when you want to experiment with several different inexpensively, to try to determine what you will find most useful before you invest in better filters for the long run. As a side note, I have used P series on 17mm lens (older Canon 17-35/2.8L to be specific, which has 77mm filter threads same as 17-40/4L) without any vignetting problems. However, the Cokin holder I have for wide lens use has been modified so that it only has a single filter slot, making it less likely to vignette.

Also, there are many manufacturers making all sorts of filters and other accessories to fit the Cokin holders. Lee, Singh-Ray, Tiffen and others make quality rectangular filters to fit different Cokin size holders. Adorama sells some house brand that's even cheaper to experiment with, than the Cokin filters. Lee makes a bellows type hood to fit them, too. Note that Cokin itself is currently in bankruptcy... Might effect availability of some items for now or in the immediate future. However I would bet that someone will pick up the company and restart it. And the system has been around so long that it's pretty easy to find stuff, still.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
al ­ heeley
Senior Member
271 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Sep 26, 2011 12:49 |  #12

Thanks Alan - informative post. I have a CPL so maybe getting an ND9 is overkill for me to start playing with. I like playing with everything in photoshop anyway so colour casts and cheaper filters is not an issue with me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,723 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Need some ND filter advice.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
890 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.