Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 25 Sep 2011 (Sunday) 19:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Lens MM vs actual distance

 
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Sep 25, 2011 19:52 |  #1

On a ff camera, how many feet closer would I be standing to a subject if I compared a 35mm to a 100mm to 200mm to 300mm to 400mm if each was like looking through only my eyes?

In other words, how many feet would I have to walk to make up the distance between each lens?

I am trying to decide what lens to get that is longer than my 70-300..... 400? 500? This is how I will figure it out. Thanks.


A9 | A7R3 | 25 | 55 | 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,349 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Sep 25, 2011 19:59 |  #2

Changing the focal length will not make the subject appear closer, it will make the subject appear larger. Those are two differenct concepts.

If you double the focal length, the subject will appear twice as large on the sensor. So going from a 300mm lens to a 600mm lens (for example) would make a subject that filled half the frame now fill the entire frame.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:08 |  #3

What I am trying to gauge is if a subject fills the frame of 100mm lens at 10 yards, what focal length would I need to fill it at 300 yards? Approx 500mm?


A9 | A7R3 | 25 | 55 | 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
juanpafer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,796 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 40
Joined May 2009
Location: Fort Myers, FL
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:08 |  #4

Another useful guide is knowing that if you want an object that is covering the short side of your sensor to cover the long side of it, you need 1.4x.
In the case of your 70-300 at 300mm, that would be 420mm.


Juan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,349 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Likes: 459
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:14 |  #5

Higgs Boson wrote in post #13161968 (external link)
What I am trying to gauge is if a subject fills the frame of 100mm lens at 10 yards, what focal length would I need to fill it at 300 yards? Approx 500mm?

100mm lens, 10 yards fills the frame.

300 yards is 30 times the initial distance to the subject, so to fill the frame with the same subject at 300 yards would require a 3000mm lens (100mm x 30).

Another way to think of this, starting again from 100mm lens and 10 yards, if you changed to a 500mm lens (5X the focal length) you would get the subject to appear the same size by moving back 5X the distance. So a 500mm lens would show the subject the same size at 50 yards (10 yards x 5).


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
juanpafer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,796 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 40
Joined May 2009
Location: Fort Myers, FL
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:20 |  #6

This is a good tool to make this type of calculations:
http://www.giangrandi.​ch/optics/lenses/focal​calc.html (external link)


Juan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,473 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:22 |  #7

Higgs Boson wrote in post #13161968 (external link)
What I am trying to gauge is if a subject fills the frame of 100mm lens at 10 yards, what focal length would I need to fill it at 300 yards? Approx 500mm?

Are you aware of how distance between the camera (or your own eyes) and the various elements in the scene in front of it/you affects perspective?

There's a lot more to composing good photographs than just filling the frame with "the subject".


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:24 |  #8

JeffreyG wrote in post #13162008 (external link)
100mm lens, 10 yards fills the frame.

300 yards is 30 times the initial distance to the subject, so to fill the frame with the same subject at 300 yards would require a 3000mm lens (100mm x 30).

Another way to think of this, starting again from 100mm lens and 10 yards, if you changed to a 500mm lens (5X the focal length) you would get the subject to appear the same size by moving back 5X the distance. So a 500mm lens would show the subject the same size at 50 yards (10 yards x 5).

Ok so it isn't a doubling rule like stops, lol. It only works once, not exponentially. I guess I can't take pictures of stuff that far away.


A9 | A7R3 | 25 | 55 | 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:27 |  #9

SkipD wrote in post #13162041 (external link)
Are you aware of how distance between the camera (or your own eyes) and the various elements in the scene in front of it/you affects perspective?

There's a lot more to composing good photographs than just filling the frame with "the subject".

Yes yes, you throw down the perspective concept in all of my threads, lol. There is more involved than just composition when you are taking pics of stuff really really far away and want subject isolation. If I am in a deer blind 50 feet off the ground and a deer is 250 yards away and I want to see the whites of his eyes, perspective of the tree behind it is not my main concern.

Game management is not about trees as much as antlers....


A9 | A7R3 | 25 | 55 | 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
17,826 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 1668
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Sep 25, 2011 20:29 |  #10

check out this link:
http://www.juzaphoto.c​om …al_length_compa​risons.htm (external link)

at the bottom there's a calculator so you can plug in the dimensions of your shot at 300mm, and it'll show you how much to crop to give an example of what 400/500mm would give you


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,473 posts
Likes: 152
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Sep 25, 2011 22:14 |  #11

Higgs Boson wrote in post #13162053 (external link)
If I am in a deer blind 50 feet off the ground and a deer is 250 yards away and I want to see the whites of his eyes, perspective of the tree behind it is not my main concern.

Game management is not about trees as much as antlers....

I fully understand. Your questions, though, didn't really steer our thinking in this direction. ;)


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Sep 26, 2011 05:42 |  #12

Fair enough. I appreciate your help as always.


A9 | A7R3 | 25 | 55 | 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
number ­ six
"After 40 years still not housebroken, I still piddle on the carpet"
Avatar
8,911 posts
Likes: 42
Joined May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
     
Sep 26, 2011 15:28 as a reply to  @ Higgs Boson's post |  #13

Higgs Boson wrote in post #13162053 (external link)
Game management is not about trees as much as antlers....

SkipD wrote in post #13162532 (external link)
I fully understand. Your questions, though, didn't really steer our thinking in this direction. ;)

As long as we're being technical, steers don't have antlers. They have horns.

You're welcome. ;)


"Be seeing you."
50D - 17-55 f/2.8 IS - 18-55 IS - 28-105 II USM - 60 f/2.8 macro - 70-200 f/4 L - Sigma flash
I do not piddle on the carpet!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
You-by-Lou
Goldmember
Avatar
1,689 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Manhattan
     
Sep 26, 2011 16:03 |  #14

Oh dear


You may say I'm a Zoomer, But I'm not the only one
Canon 5D mkIII
135L my new favorite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,953 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Sep 26, 2011 19:08 |  #15

number six wrote in post #13166375 (external link)
As long as we're being technical, steers don't have antlers. They have horns.

You're welcome. ;)

Booooo! If I had a tomato it would be heading your direction.


A9 | A7R3 | 25 | 55 | 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,833 views & 0 likes for this thread
Lens MM vs actual distance
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Sureshot99
435 guests, 349 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.