Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 25 Sep 2011 (Sunday) 22:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Focus seems way off in all my images. What's up with that?

 
StayLucky
Senior Member
Avatar
719 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Sep 25, 2011 22:25 |  #1

I've been reviewing some of my raw and final images in the past couple days and it looks to me as though my images are out of focus. I typically use the manual focus point selection and focus on a specific area like an eye, nose or center of the face.

A lot of my concert images seem out of focus all across the image. I'll post up some images ASAP for reference but in the mean time can anyone share some tips on focusing in camera? I'm using a 50D with a 50 1.4 lens these days.

Also, is there no way I can use more that one focus point manually?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 25, 2011 22:30 |  #2

Maybe you're trying to use the camera beyond its design limits.

Maybe your camera and/or lens needs calibrated.

Maybe your images aren't sharpened enough.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5x5 ­ photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,156 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 25, 2011 22:43 |  #3

What f stop are you shooting at? I am assuming that you are at f/1.4 for your concert photographs. Bear in mind at f/1.4 your DOF is very shallow. So your focus point may be right but the focus does not carry through the depth of the subject.
What shutter speed are you using. My rule of thumb for concert photography is no less then 125th of a second on the shutter to minimize motion blur.


My firearms review site. http://rangehot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 25, 2011 23:09 |  #4

StayLucky wrote in post #13162589 (external link)
I've been reviewing some of my raw and final images in the past couple days and it looks to me as though my images are out of focus. I typically use the manual focus point selection and focus on a specific area like an eye, nose or center of the face.

What software are you using to view your Raw images? And do you apply Input Sharpening to those images before judging them soft?

If you can, it could benefit you to use the Canon Raw software Digital Photo Professional (DPP) to give these images a once-over. DPP uses your in-camera Picture Style to render a preview for a Raw image, meaning that when you look at that first preview you are seeing a "jpeg-like" image with things like Contrast, Saturation and Sharpening applied, along with your other in-camera settings. Plus, because you are dealing with Raw, DPP lets you change all those things around.

So, possibly you are seeing these Raw previews without any input sharpening applied, as well as other processing, because many Raw processors go light on these things until you decide to apply them. Adobe Raw processors are like that.

But of course you could be having other problems:

A lot of my concert images seem out of focus all across the image. I'll post up some images ASAP for reference but in the mean time can anyone share some tips on focusing in camera? I'm using a 50D with a 50 1.4 lens these days.

Yeah post some pics and we'll have a better idea of how to respond!

Also, is there no way I can use more that one focus point manually?

If you mean more than one point active at the same time, well, no...the reason why so many folks don't like to shoot with auto point selection is that we don't like the juggling act we have to go through whenever the camera selects the wrong point, which it does so often!

For your low-light concert shooting, you may be best served just using the Center focus point, although I'm not sure of the specifics of the 50D, but the center points do tend to be more reliable. However, if it was me, I'd use one or another of the outer points if the light allowed it, to get good framing/composition.

But, show us some stuff, and make sure that the pics will actually show us the problems you are having, cropping so that we can clearly see the "softness". And, get the exif to use, either writing out your aperture, shutter speed and ISO, having it embedded in your files, or copying and pasting it from your own Exif reader!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Sep 26, 2011 03:36 |  #5

Also, is there no way I can use more that one focus point manually?

No.
And actually, even in Auto Point Selection you never use more than one point. When multiple points light up it is because they are within the DoF (DoF by Canon's wide definition), but only one of them is the point used for focus calculation.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Sep 26, 2011 03:45 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Perhaps you, like me sometimes, keeps knocking the AF switch on the lens to MF (manual focus) accidentally




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Sep 26, 2011 03:46 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

StayLucky wrote in post #13162589 (external link)
I've been reviewing some of my raw and final images in the past couple days and it looks to me as though my images are out of focus. I typically use the manual focus point selection and focus on a specific area like an eye, nose or center of the face.

A lot of my concert images seem out of focus all across the image. I'll post up some images ASAP for reference but in the mean time can anyone share some tips on focusing in camera? I'm using a 50D with a 50 1.4 lens these days.

Also, is there no way I can use more that one focus point manually?

With the 50D this is impossible, with cameras like the 1D I think this is possible, not quite sure about the 7D though




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kitacanon
Goldmember
4,706 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 36
Joined Sep 2006
Location: West Palm Beach
     
Sep 26, 2011 07:23 |  #8

StayLucky wrote in post #13162589 (external link)
I've been reviewing some of my raw and final images in the past couple days and it looks to me as though my images are out of focus. I typically use the manual focus point selection and focus on a specific area like an eye, nose or center of the face.

A lot of my concert images seem out of focus all across the image. I'll post up some images ASAP for reference but in the mean time can anyone share some tips on focusing in camera? I'm using a 50D with a 50 1.4 lens these days.

Also, is there no way I can use more that one focus point manually?

Since you focus manually why not get the optional manual focusing screen?
I have it in my 40D and focus ANYwhere on the screen...when I focus manually with my MF lenses I don't use any of the boxes on the screen. [edit...MF this way is not easy....I have decades of practice shooting that way]

But, to better help you it would be helpful if we could see an example of your concert images to make sure that the blurry photo is not a result of camera shake due to (among many variables), too slow a shutter speed.


My Canon kit 450D/s90; Canon lenses 18-55 IS, 70-210/3.5-4.5....Nikon kit: D610; 28-105/3.5-4.5, 75-300/4.5-5.6 AF, 50/1.8D Nikkors, Tamron 80-210; MF Nikkors: 50/2K, 50/1.4 AI-S, 50/1.8 SeriesE, 60/2.8 Micro Nikkor (AF locked), 85mm/1.8K-AI, 105/2.5 AIS/P.C, 135/2.8K/Q.C, 180/2.8 ED, 200/4Q/AIS, 300/4.5H-AI, ++ Tamron 70-210/3.8-4, Vivitar/Kiron 28/2, ser.1 70-210/3.5, ser.1 28-90; Vivitar/Komine and Samyang 28/2.8; 35mm Nikon F/FM/FE2, Rebel 2K...HTC RE UWA camera

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Sep 26, 2011 08:53 |  #9

Since you focus manually why not get the optional manual focusing screen?

But the OP did not say he focuses manually. He said he selects the auto focus point manually.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CameraMan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,368 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 813
Joined Dec 2010
Location: In The Sticks
     
Sep 26, 2011 08:58 |  #10

With the 50 at 1.4 I find it easier to use the center point focus and after I have what I want in focus I compose the shot while holding the finger on the shutter release half way down.

Some say that the 50 1.4 is bad in dark rooms. Mine has it's days but the last 2 wedding shoots I did in reception rooms that were pretty dark, the 50 1.4 performed exceptionally well for me.


Photographer (external link) | The Toys! | Video (external link) | Flickr (external link)
Shampoo sounds like an unfortunate name for a hair product.
You're a ghost driving a meat-coated skeleton made from stardust, riding a rock, hurtling through space. Fear Nothing!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wide ­ Boy
Senior Member
Avatar
629 posts
Joined May 2011
     
Sep 26, 2011 09:13 as a reply to  @ CameraMan's post |  #11

I was using the 50 1.8 on some model shots recently, using the centre point AF to take focus on the eye then re compose. On reviewing the raw files, a lot of the shots were out of focus, or rather the eye was slightly out of focus. I put this down to a number of reasons, the main one being that the dof is so shallow on the 1.8, about 20mm to 30mm that even if I did get perfect focus on the eye when re composing if either I or the model moved a bit then focus was lost. On the 1.4 the dof will be even thinner.
Another reason I have discovered is that often a tiny hair in front of her eye will be perfectly sharp, so I presume the auto focus has picked up on the hair rather than the eye.
Next time, probably this weekend, I will mostly be using Manual Focus, not as easy with the tiny digital viewfinder as it was with a film camera, but I am going to give it a go.


Sony A7 | 28-70 | Tamron 15-30 (Canon fit)
550D with a battery grip | Canon 70-200mm F4L | Canon 50mm 1.8mkII | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | YN 460II |
Nikon D7000 | 18-55 G VR | Tokina 11-16 2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Sep 26, 2011 09:23 |  #12

5x5 photography wrote in post #13162663 (external link)
What f stop are you shooting at? I am assuming that you are at f/1.4 for your concert photographs. Bear in mind at f/1.4 your DOF is very shallow. So your focus point may be right but the focus does not carry through the depth of the subject.
What shutter speed are you using. My rule of thumb for concert photography is no less then 125th of a second on the shutter to minimize motion blur.

The DOF may not necessarily be that thin at f1.4. There could easily be 12 inches in focus and for a concert, focusing on someone's face should yield appropriate sharpness on that subject at least. If the distance was greater than 10' for example, there should be enough DOF to work with.

What was the AF mode set to? Hopefully not One Shot... ;)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SpeedyGoo
Member
242 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Sep 26, 2011 10:55 |  #13

Please post an example I would assume it's a mixture of slow shutter speed and using very shallow depth of field meaning your pin point sharp area is likley very small examples and exif would allow us to assist you more. Finally bright lights and dirty lens are a image killer for concerts




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
5x5 ­ photography
Goldmember
Avatar
1,156 posts
Joined Feb 2009
Location: North Carolina
     
Sep 26, 2011 16:45 |  #14

TeamSpeed wrote in post #13164736 (external link)
The DOF may not necessarily be that thin at f1.4. There could easily be 12 inches in focus and for a concert, focusing on someone's face should yield appropriate sharpness on that subject at least. If the distance was greater than 10' for example, there should be enough DOF to work with.

What was the AF mode set to? Hopefully not One Shot... ;)

That would depend on how far away you were from the subject,


My firearms review site. http://rangehot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AJSJones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,647 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 92
Joined Dec 2001
Location: California
     
Sep 26, 2011 17:19 |  #15

tzalman wrote in post #13163804 (external link)
No.
And actually, even in Auto Point Selection you never use more than one point. When multiple points light up it is because they are within the DoF (DoF by Canon's wide definition), but only one of them is the point used for focus calculation.

Is Canon's definition any wider than other lens makers' definition? I agree it is wide, given how well sensors capture and how big a print one can make, compared to the standard size, but that's a little different issue. It is probably relevant for this discussion, because pixel peeping will reveal even thinner DoF than even in a moderately large print :D


My picture galleries (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,374 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Focus seems way off in all my images. What's up with that?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
936 guests, 182 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.