Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 26 Sep 2011 (Monday) 17:31
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

My first attempt with new camera

 
the ­ jimmy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 26, 2011 17:31 |  #1

Recently bought a used 450D off ebay, it is my first DSLR, moving up from a G11. The purpose of this post isn't "look at my great shot" I know it's not that good. Rather I had a heck of a time with the focus. I couldn't see any stars thru live view or the OVF, and auto focus didn't work. My lens is the kit lens. This was taken around 9pm and I do live in an area with a lot of light polution. Any advice would be welcomed.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tiberius
Goldmember
Avatar
2,556 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2008
     
Sep 26, 2011 20:17 |  #2

Not bad for a first try. What was your ISO?


My photography website!PHOCAL PHOTOGRAPHY (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drevilsmom
Goldmember
Avatar
1,100 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: Miami, FL
     
Sep 26, 2011 20:35 |  #3

Not bad for a first shot. Even got a couple of deep space goodies in the Sagittarius region!


Elizabeth

40D and modded 20D| 18-55 mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | nifty fifty | assortment of pentax lenses with adapter
CG-5GT | AT102ED

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legoman_iac
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Sep 26, 2011 22:00 |  #4

Nice start ... it can be difficult to see stars even through the OVF I've found, especially if it's a wide angle lens. Some beginner advice (ie. from a beginner) would be:

- set your lens to manual focus
- try it set to 'infinity' focus, take a few pics at different exposures, then review
- adjust focus slightly, try some more pics, then review again
- try different ISOs ... anywhere from ISO 400 - ISO 1600 (remember the higher the number the noisier it'll be, older cameras I hear don;t like going over ISO 800)

If you get into stacking images the noise issue can kind of be taken care of ... kind of. Check out things like Deep Sky Stacker, is that's what you're after.

It can be misleading relying on the LCD on the back sometimes, so be ideal if you can plug the camera into a laptop via USB, and use the Canon software to review on screen.

Just checking you have a tripod and remote release? Or at least using a 2 second delay to avoid shaking the camera when you press down to take the photo.

Hope this helps, keen to see your progress!

- Daniel


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
martyn_bannister
Senior Member
568 posts
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 27, 2011 03:55 |  #5

Very nice start. For first attempt its well good.

Stopping the lens down a couple of stops makes it much easier to hit infinity focus. So set manual focus on the lens, stop down two stops from wide open and rack the focus all the way in, you should hit infinity. Focusing on something a long way away (moon/skyline/city lights) will confirm.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 27, 2011 11:53 |  #6

Tiberius47 wrote in post #13167613 (external link)
Not bad for a first try. What was your ISO?

ISO 800
f/5.6
20 seconds




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 27, 2011 12:00 |  #7

legoman_iac wrote in post #13168266 (external link)
Nice start ... it can be difficult to see stars even through the OVF I've found, especially if it's a wide angle lens. Some beginner advice (ie. from a beginner) would be:

- set your lens to manual focus Yes I did
- try it set to 'infinity' focus, take a few pics at different exposures, then review
- adjust focus slightly, try some more pics, then review again
- try different ISOs ... anywhere from ISO 400 - ISO 1600 (remember the higher the number the noisier it'll be, older cameras I hear don;t like going over ISO 800)

If you get into stacking images the noise issue can kind of be taken care of ... kind of. Check out things like Deep Sky Stacker, is that's what you're after. I'm sure I'll try this

It can be misleading relying on the LCD on the back sometimes, so be ideal if you can plug the camera into a laptop via USB, and use the Canon software to review on screen. This is a good idea I'll try that

Just checking you have a tripod and remote release? Or at least using a 2 second delay to avoid shaking the camera when you press down to take the photo. Yes, tripod and 2 sec timer, the focus was what I fought with

Hope this helps, keen to see your progress!

- Daniel

Thanks for the suggestions




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 27, 2011 12:04 |  #8

martyn_bannister wrote in post #13169920 (external link)
Very nice start. For first attempt its well good.

Stopping the lens down a couple of stops makes it much easier to hit infinity focus. So set manual focus on the lens, stop down two stops from wide open and rack the focus all the way in, you should hit infinity. Focusing on something a long way away (moon/skyline/city lights) will confirm.

Good ideas, the moon wasn't available, and in my neighborhood there isn't anything so far away, that I can focus on, and would expect the stars to also be in focus at that setting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 27, 2011 12:12 as a reply to  @ the jimmy's post |  #9

I'm also thinking I should shoot in black & white, this may be a better shot as the light polution won't show up as the orange-red color. Also at such a wide angle I don't think there is any color to capture in the night sky.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legoman_iac
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Sep 27, 2011 16:06 |  #10

Setting your lens to infinity won't guarantee stars will be in focus, but its usually a good place to start.

Are you shooting RAW or JPEG? If you shoot in jpeg, you'll be stuck with the colour mode you shot with, if you shoot in raw, you'll preview black and white, but have the freedom to change your mind later ... this can be confusing, as you'll be looking for B&W but only find colour pics, you just have to turn on grayscale in camera raw.

Also, best to shoot raw for astro work. My numbers are likely wrong, but approximately ... jpegs give you 256 'shades' from white to black per RGB channel, where raw gives you around 4096 shades/steps per channel, allowing you to capture shades of colour which fall between the cracks of jpegs.

Again, hope this helps and good luck!


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 27, 2011 16:36 |  #11

legoman_iac wrote in post #13172559 (external link)
Setting your lens to infinity won't guarantee stars will be in focus, but its usually a good place to start.

Are you shooting RAW or JPEG? If you shoot in jpeg, you'll be stuck with the colour mode you shot with, if you shoot in raw, you'll preview black and white, but have the freedom to change your mind later ... this can be confusing, as you'll be looking for B&W but only find colour pics, you just have to turn on grayscale in camera raw.

Also, best to shoot raw for astro work. My numbers are likely wrong, but approximately ... jpegs give you 256 'shades' from white to black per RGB channel, where raw gives you around 4096 shades/steps per channel, allowing you to capture shades of colour which fall between the cracks of jpegs.

Again, hope this helps and good luck!

I understand, good point. Looks like I may have clear skies tonight.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 27, 2011 20:13 as a reply to  @ the jimmy's post |  #12

This time I used the EOS utility and remotely took the pic. Although I still had to manually focus thru trial and error, took about 4 shots and I found the sweet spot. I did try auto focus, but got a focus error message

Years ago I used a 35mm SLR and focus was straight forward, infinity at one end and close focus at the opposite. Using the kit lens it was somewhere in the middle I'd guess.

This is a RAW tweaked a little with my limited knowledge and even less experience with RAW.

ISO 400
f/5.6
30 sec


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
legoman_iac
Senior Member
308 posts
Likes: 50
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Sydney
     
Sep 27, 2011 22:41 |  #13

Nice improvement ... hopefully I'm helping more than hindering. Though looks like 30 sec might be too much for your lens, this seems to have some slight drift creeping in around the edges. Do you have any 15 and 20 sec subs? Also, there are some great tips and tutorials online for processing which will be a great help. Some suggest to do several rounds of adjustments, as you need to stretch the data.

Ofcourse something I should have mentioned earlier, to help with focusing (though not sure how well it works with camera lenses, but it's great for telescopes) is a 'Bahtinov mask'. They go for around $40 in Australia, so probably US$10, haha. You hold this in front of your 'scope' while focusing and you see spikes around your stars. It's like an X with an I overlayed, when it's out of focus the I will be offset slightly, you then focus until the spikes are centred. Might be worth looking into if you have no joy with your lenses.

Could be your old film gear focused better, but something I see online is that there's a lot more pixel peeping going on and everybody is more critical of focus these days, where you'll view an image 100% (or more) and not as it is printed out from the local photo lab spits them out.

Another tip I've seen posted, is to tape the focusing ring on your lens once you've got it right, saves accidently bumping it, especially when working in the dark ... though you'll probably bump it slightly when taping it ... again something to try as it might be worth it. Try something that isn;t too gluey or leaves too much residue, I find 3M micropore tape from pharmacies works well for some of my gear.

The EOS utility is probably better for reviewing shots as the Live View is only slightly better than the back of your camera. If you do use Live View, make sure you select the '200%' or '2x' button, to zoom in, helps to magnify things a little.

Best of luck!

- Daniel

p.s. Don't be put off if you buy some gear and get clouds for a week or two, always happens!


2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Sep 28, 2011 08:29 |  #14

the jimmy wrote in post #13173530 (external link)
This time I used the EOS utility and remotely took the pic. Although I still had to manually focus thru trial and error, took about 4 shots and I found the sweet spot. I did try auto focus, but got a focus error message

Years ago I used a 35mm SLR and focus was straight forward, infinity at one end and close focus at the opposite. Using the kit lens it was somewhere in the middle I'd guess.

This is a RAW tweaked a little with my limited knowledge and even less experience with RAW.

ISO 400
f/5.6
30 sec

Yeah, trial and error focus is what I always have to do. Though with experience, you'll be able to set your focus manually pretty close, so zeroing in won't take too long. For my lens, it's move all the way to the infinity stop, and then back it off "a bit".


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,538 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
My first attempt with new camera
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1522 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.