I have a Tamron 28-75 2.8 Canon mt...that i use on my 30D & XSi,,,i would like a lens with great IQ like that with IS,OS,VC,,any ideas?? at an affordable price....Use,,about every thing,, close-up,,landscape,,kids,,flowers..ECT.... Thanks Ron
RonnieH Goldmember 1,793 posts Likes: 53 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Twining, Michigan USA More info | Sep 28, 2011 07:27 | #1 I have a Tamron 28-75 2.8 Canon mt...that i use on my 30D & XSi,,,i would like a lens with great IQ like that with IS,OS,VC,,any ideas?? at an affordable price....Use,,about every thing,, close-up,,landscape,,kids,,flowers..ECT.... Thanks Ron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 28, 2011 07:33 | #2 Checkout & consider the Sigma 17-50/f2.8 OS HSM : Silverfox1 POTN Feedback / TC Extender Tests / Gear List
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Sep 28, 2011 07:35 | #3 There is nothing out there in that focal range with image stabilization. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill. 57,729 posts Likes: 4064 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Sep 28, 2011 07:47 | #4 Great IQ and affordable price tend to be mutually exclusive but here are a few to consider. Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RAH1861 Senior Member 330 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 More info | I think the Sigma 17-70 would be a good choice. It's cheaper than the 17-50 (which is an "EX" higher-grade lens), but it is very sharp and the IS is very effective. Rich
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 28, 2011 09:40 | #6 17-70 OS would fit the bill, focuses closer than most non-macro so great for closeup, and wider + longer than the 17-50's so as a lens for "about everything" its hard to beat. IMG_5125e IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/noobography/5954382990/ IMG_7076 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/noobography/5954871641/ IMG_7180 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …s/noobography/5953817023/ IMG_7384 -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cfcRebel Cream of the Crop 10,252 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: Austin, TX More info | Sep 28, 2011 09:46 | #7 Ronnie H wrote in post #13175582 I have a Tamron 28-75 2.8 Canon mt...that i use on my 30D & XSi,,,i would like a lens with great IQ like that with IS,OS,VC,,any ideas?? at an affordable price....Use,,about every thing,, close-up,,landscape,,kids,,flowers..ECT.... Thanks Ron Not sure about your copy of Tamron 28-75 f2.8 but mine produces great image quality. I realized this when i got a EF 24-105 f4L and compared the two. Almost have no difference in Sharpness. The L produces slightly, just slightly better colors. Both handle CA well. Do I like the IS more or the large aperture f2.8? I found f2.8 gives me more advantage for what i am shooting. I guess that means my 24-105 f4 IS won't be in my possession long. Fee
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KWbarbs Member 50 posts Joined Aug 2008 Location: Belfast NI More info | Sep 28, 2011 09:52 | #8 cfcRebel wrote in post #13176115 Not sure about your copy of Tamron 28-75 f2.8 but mine produces great image quality. I realized this when i got a EF 24-105 f4L and compared the two. Almost have no difference in Sharpness. The L produces slightly, just slightly better colors. Both handle CA well. Do I like the IS more or the large aperture f2.8? I found f2.8 gives me more advantage for what i am shooting. I guess that means my 24-105 f4 IS won't be in my possession long. ![]() I would have to agree with this. I moved form a Tammy 28-75 to a Canon 24-105 f4 L IS. Both of these worked on my 7D and a few weeks back I sold the 24-105 and got a Canon 17-55 f2.8 IS. Like the above poster, I missed the f2.8 more than I needed the IS..... now I have both
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RonnieH THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,793 posts Likes: 53 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Twining, Michigan USA More info | Sep 28, 2011 10:13 | #9
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RAH1861 Senior Member 330 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 More info | Sep 28, 2011 21:15 | #10 Ronnie H wrote in post #13176219 any one have focus problems with the Sigma 17-70 OS ?? I have not had any problems with the 17-70's focusing. I will admit that I do not like the fact that the focus ring turns when you use AF - you have to be careful not to touch the ring while the camera is focusing. Also, I do wish that it had full-time manual focus, the way my Tamron 70-300, Canon 60, and Canon 400 do. However, I still like the lens a lot and would recommend it. I LOVE its close-focusing ability, mentioned by Sirrith. Rich
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 1340 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||