Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Sep 2011 (Wednesday) 15:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Colour question again ( sorry )

 
tommmy.star
Senior Member
Avatar
294 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: london
     
Sep 28, 2011 15:57 |  #1

Fisrtly, let me thank you guys for taking the time answering my posts. I personally think it's impossible to understand colour management over one weekend and as the time passes by I feel that I know more and more about this scaring and intimidating topic of colour management.

Here is a couple of questions that I thought of the other day. I think the answer to the 1st one is 'no' but I need your reassurance:)

1. I use a normal gamut monitor(HP ZR24w) will I see any difference/ benefit working in colour spaces other than sRGB. I think as my monitor cannot display colours outside the sRGB gamut, I won't see any difference on my monitor switching between those colour spaces, right?So apart from future proofing my images should they invent a monitor capable of displaying double the ProPhotoRGB colour space, there is no reason to work in a colour space other than sRGB if you use a normal gamut monitor like mine.

2. Then, the next question is this. If I work on a wide gamut display in a colour space other than sRGB and than save for web(sRGB) what will happen with the colours that are outside the sRGB gamut. Will photoshop 'invent' them somehow or will they be replaced with the nearest one. If so, then in almost all cases when working in let's say AdobeRGB and than converting to sRGB will result in an image that slighlt different to the original, correct?

3.I know it's been explaind here before but I cannot seem to find that particular post here. Can someone run this through me again. What do the asterisk ' * ' signs mean. I know that depending where ther are it warns you about the colour profile mismatches, right? Why is it that when I start with an images there is no * and then as soon as I duplicate the layer an asterisk comes on?

4. And finally, when you save for web a window comes up divided into four parts. These are 'Original', 'Optimised', '2-up', '4-up'. What is the purpose of those and what do they do?

I know there are a few questions here so I hope it all makes sense and I will find some time helping me to understand CM even better.

Really appreciate your help.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Canon 5DIII |Canon 30mm f2 | Canon 85mm f1.2L |Canon 100mm f2.4L| Canon 70-200mm f2.8II L
London Wedding Photographer (external link)
My 500px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommmy.star
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
294 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: london
     
Sep 28, 2011 16:09 |  #2

kjonnnn wrote in post #13177950 (external link)
3. It means the file has been changed and not saved since you opened it.

Thanks kjonnnn. And what about other positions of asterisk?


Canon 5DIII |Canon 30mm f2 | Canon 85mm f1.2L |Canon 100mm f2.4L| Canon 70-200mm f2.8II L
London Wedding Photographer (external link)
My 500px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 28, 2011 16:43 |  #3

1. Just because you can't see colors it doesn't mean they're not there. I use a cheap Samsung LCD and it matches my prints just fine, i'm a wedding pro. Your output device (printer) is more important than your view of the image, unless you're doing critical color matching - which is different from basic color correction or making a nice looking image.
2. Related to #1. Wide gamut displays sound like a waste of money for most people, to me. If the colors in your document don't fit inside your output color space they're rendered to something that will fit with something called something like a rendering intent - I forget the details.
4. Shows you the image with varying levels of compression.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 28, 2011 16:44 |  #4

Get and read this book (external link).


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Sep 28, 2011 17:18 |  #5

Question #2 first. When you convert from a larger space to a smaller one something has to be done about those colors that are outside the small space. The method of dealing with them is called a Rendering Intent and there are two of them that photographers use, Perceptual and Relative Colorimetric. Imagine a team of football players sitting on a bench. Now we move them to a shorter bench and the guy at the end has no place to sit. He can do two things - he can yell, "Hey you guys, move over," and several player scrunch together until there is room for him to sit at the end. That's Perceptual Rendering. Or he can sit on the lap of the player already sitting at the end. That's Colorimetric Rendering. In Perceptual the out-of-gamut colors are changed to the closest in-gamut colors and several nearby colors are changed also, compressing them to make room. In Relative Colorimetric the OOG colors all become the closest in-gamut color but other in-gamut colors don't change, so if in the wide space you had Red 1, Red 2, Red 3 and Red 4, of which only Red 1 is also in the narrow space, all the reds are now Red 1. Fine gradations and details are lost. Conversions from ProPhoto RGB or Adobe RGB to sRGB are always R. C., conversions to a device (monitor or printer) space can be either if the profile allows for it.

So to answer #1., if the image is in a space larger than the monitor's space, you may see inaccuracies in colors that are close to the limits, but those will be a small percentage of the millions of colors in the image. So editing in a wide space won't offer any direct advantage, but if you print with a good quality inkjet its gamut will very likely be wider than your "normal" monitor.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommmy.star
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
294 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: london
     
Sep 28, 2011 17:58 |  #6

tzalman wrote in post #13178296 (external link)
. Imagine a team of football players sitting on a bench. Now we move them to a shorter bench and the guy at the end has no place to sit. He can do two things - he can yell, "Hey you guys, move over," and several player scrunch together until there is room for him to sit at the end. That's Perceptual Rendering. Or he can sit on the lap of the player already sitting at the end. That's Colorimetric Rendering.

Thanks tzalman! That must be by far the best way to explain the diffrence between those to renderings! Brilliant!


Canon 5DIII |Canon 30mm f2 | Canon 85mm f1.2L |Canon 100mm f2.4L| Canon 70-200mm f2.8II L
London Wedding Photographer (external link)
My 500px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 29, 2011 00:56 |  #7

Conversion from AdobeRGB to sRGB in Photoshop are always colorimetric.

Save for web: http://www.getcolorman​aged.com/color-management/saveforweb/ (external link)

On the asteriks:

IMAGE: http://img.skitch.com/20080623-gewsfxk3p25a9hpas2nnn16a1u.jpg

"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tommmy.star
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
294 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: london
     
Sep 29, 2011 13:34 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #8

Kjonnnn, tim, tzalman, Rene, thank you very much for explaing all the above.
I will definately return with more questions soon.


Canon 5DIII |Canon 30mm f2 | Canon 85mm f1.2L |Canon 100mm f2.4L| Canon 70-200mm f2.8II L
London Wedding Photographer (external link)
My 500px.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

737 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Colour question again ( sorry )
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is RawBytes
1369 guests, 159 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.