Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 28 Sep 2011 (Wednesday) 16:33
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which photoshop version is revolutionary?

 
texshooter
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Sep 28, 2011 16:33 |  #1

I own the cs4 master collection and would like to know if cs5.5 is more revolutionary than cs4 was. I want to wait for the next revolution before I upgrade. Small improvements are not worth the money to me. Examples of revolutions are smart filters and open gl zooming. And are there any rumors about any revolutions that adobe has planned for the next five years?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 28, 2011 19:16 |  #2

One practical approach would be to put off upgrading until your "discount period" is at the end, which means you could put off upgrading until CS7 is about to change over to CS8.

Otherwise, each new release adds good features, but whether it's "revolutionary" depends on your post-processing wants and needs.

For some folks the "Content Aware Fill" in CS5 is "revolutionary" enough to prompt an upgrade, but there are, I'm sure, plenty of CS4 users who are quite happy!

For me, I'm happy using CS3 when needed, but I'm not one who would use Content Aware Fill often enough to make it worth the expense...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Chris1le
Senior Member
Avatar
891 posts
Joined Aug 2003
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
     
Sep 28, 2011 19:33 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #3

The one that supports your camera. ;)


My Pictures (external link) : My Gear (external link)
I Reject Your Reality And Substitute My Own - Adam Savage

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Sep 28, 2011 19:52 |  #4

Chris1le wrote in post #13178867 (external link)
The one that supports your camera. ;)

Great answer. I think the updates to ACR stop fast enough to leave models behind.

I have had CS2 through 5. I would say 3 was a pretty major upgrade, 4 and 5 not as much.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 28, 2011 20:16 |  #5

S.Horton wrote in post #13178967 (external link)
Great answer. I think the updates to ACR stop fast enough to leave models behind.

I have had CS2 through 5. I would say 3 was a pretty major upgrade, 4 and 5 not as much.

Yeah, I was happy with the CS3 upgrade. One thing it improved on was "stitching", which at the time I was doing a fair amount of, and CS3 made a significant upgrade there. And, of course, Camera Raw sould good improvements as well.

And, since Camera Raw in CS3 supports the 3 DSLRs that I've been using, well, I've been happy to stick with CS3, although LR3 is now my go-to tool for "serious" Raw processing.

It's funny though -- I still have Lightroom 1.4, and it still manages my older "catalog" -- everything from '00 to '09 is in LR1. And, I've occasionally done a quick processing job using LR1.4 with no pain!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Sep 28, 2011 20:23 |  #6

I also think CS2 was the last version I got a printed manual with. I am not sure at there is a printed manual at all for 5.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Sep 28, 2011 20:28 |  #7

CS5 looks like a minor upgrade from CS4 to me, in terms of raw processing. CS5.5 has nothing much over 5.0 for raw too. There's more upgrades in PS itself, content aware fill, but just take the photo right and you don't have to mess with it. I'm skipping CS5. CS6, maybe, we'll see.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Sep 29, 2011 00:53 |  #8

PS3: Layers
PS4: Adjustment layers
PS5: Color management
PS6: Color management done right
PSCS: Introduction of ACR as we know it. 16bpc.
PSCS4: New user interface, 64bit on windows
PSCS5: 64 bit on OSX. Rest relatively minor.

http://en.wikipedia.or​g …Photoshop_relea​se_history (external link)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 29, 2011 01:28 |  #9

Good stuff, René!

It's pretty amazing when you consider how long Photoshop has been around -- has it been 25 years now?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Sep 29, 2011 03:27 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #10

Depends on your definition of revolutionizing. I upgrade each version, not that I have to but I just do. I would think that upgrading every other release would give you more of a feeling of getting more for your money. It also depends on what you are using it for. If you are only editing images there are some very nice additions in the last couple of releases. If you are doing this plus say some design or digital painting work there have been even more that might dazzle you. The whole content aware concept is great when it works but you never know what your results are going to be. For me being able to work in 64 bit was great.

I haven't heard any rumors and when a new release is getting close to release they usually start to drop the odd tidbit of info on some of the new things that they are looking at. I haven't seen any of these and even the things in labs.adobe.com are not earth shattering imo. I'm thinking maybe next spring at the earliest but that is simply my guess.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,070 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Which photoshop version is revolutionary?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1034 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.