Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 29 Sep 2011 (Thursday) 00:58
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Is my macro lens ok?

 
SouthFlorida_Tron
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
     
Sep 29, 2011 00:58 |  #1

So i asked about a focus ring issue earlier, just wanted to see if its the lens, or settings issue, or if the lens looks to be ok........

IMAGE: http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/jonshirk84/Krugtest1.jpg

IMAGE: http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/jonshirk84/Krugtest2.jpg

another example

IMAGE: http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/jonshirk84/kisstest2.jpg

IMAGE: http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/jonshirk84/kisstest1.jpg


any other tests i can run?

< Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
My Flickr (external link)
My "Nano-Reef" Aquarium Thread (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Sep 29, 2011 01:44 |  #2

Your images look fine. Why so much testing?


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SouthFlorida_Tron
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
     
Sep 29, 2011 01:46 as a reply to  @ macroimage's post |  #3

It was bought here from a user, and was stated as perfect condition, first thing I notice out of box is a wiggle or play from front to back of lens on the focus ring, so I am concerned....


< Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
My Flickr (external link)
My "Nano-Reef" Aquarium Thread (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Sep 29, 2011 01:49 |  #4

I just checked my EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM that I purchased new from Adorama. It also has some axial play in the focus ring.


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
titi_67207
Senior Member
Avatar
496 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Strasbourg, France
     
Sep 29, 2011 08:07 |  #5

Images look OK for me, but don't forget for macro/proxy photos to close the aperture to a value like f/8 or f/11 to have a sufficient depth of field.

Stop the tests, it's time to use your new lens !

Titi


Canon 5D MkII + Sony A7 + 24x36 & 6x6 B&W film cameras .
CV 15 4.5 III | TS-E 24L II | FE 28 2 | (50+85) 1.4 | 135 2 | 70-200 4.0L | a collection of old Zuikos + FD + Adaptall + AI-s + M42

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shinksma
Senior Member
Avatar
710 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 29, 2011 08:27 |  #6

I have a very minor (to me) amount of axial wiggle on my 100mm 2.8 macro USM focus ring too. Not enough to detect visually at normal hand-held distance, but I can feel it. Didn't even notice it until I just checked now.

I wouldn't worry about it.

shinksma


5DII | T3i | EF 17-40 L | EF 24-105 L | EF 24 1.4 L II | EF 28 1.8 | EF 85 1.8 | EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II | EF 100-400 L | EF-S 15-85 IS USM | EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM | EF-S 10-22 USM | EF 100 2.8 Macro USM | EF-S 18-55 IS | EF 35-80 III | EF-S 55-250 IS | Rokinon 8mm FE | EF 75-300 non-USM III | SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 | Tamron 70-210 | 430EX II | Kenko 2x MC4 and 1.4x Pro300DGX TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Sep 29, 2011 09:59 |  #7

Measuring with a feeler gauge, I measured 0.006" (0.152mm) of axial play in the focus ring. It is perceptible and just visible but not enough to be bothersome.


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Daniel ­ Browning
Goldmember
1,199 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
     
Sep 29, 2011 10:26 |  #8

Looks OK to me.


Daniel

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SouthFlorida_Tron
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
     
Sep 29, 2011 10:28 |  #9

Thx everyone. Much more comfortable now lol


< Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
My Flickr (external link)
My "Nano-Reef" Aquarium Thread (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Raylon
Goldmember
Avatar
1,078 posts
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Plainfield, IL
     
Sep 29, 2011 10:29 |  #10

I had a Canon 85mm 1.8 that had a huge amount of play in the focus ring. It would make a audible clack every time I tried to focus back and forth because there was so much play. That one I did send back. Sounds like yours is very minor compared to something like what I had.


7D l Canon 70-200 f/4L IS l Canon 85mm f/1.8 l ∑ 17-50 f/2.8 l Canon 50mm f/1.8 II l S95
Full Gear List and Marketplace Feedback
My SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SouthFlorida_Tron
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
     
Sep 29, 2011 11:13 |  #11

im thinking about going to best buy and asking "hey, this was a gift, i dont have a receipt, yet its a bit faulty, may i exchange it"?


Any thoughts?


< Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
My Flickr (external link)
My "Nano-Reef" Aquarium Thread (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shinksma
Senior Member
Avatar
710 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 29, 2011 12:14 |  #12

I think you are over-thinking it. How about you go into Best Buy or a camera shop and feel one of their "new" lenses and see if it feels any different from the one you have. Try to have same overall environmental conditions (i.e. room temperature around 74 deg F) so that you aren't confusing looseness with thermal expansion.

If the brand-new one feels tremendously more awesome than your current copy, PM the seller and discuss whether you wish to return the lens.

Please don't use Best Buy or any other retailer as as dumping ground for something you got elsewhere. That's fraud.

IMHO,

shinksma


5DII | T3i | EF 17-40 L | EF 24-105 L | EF 24 1.4 L II | EF 28 1.8 | EF 85 1.8 | EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II | EF 100-400 L | EF-S 15-85 IS USM | EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM | EF-S 10-22 USM | EF 100 2.8 Macro USM | EF-S 18-55 IS | EF 35-80 III | EF-S 55-250 IS | Rokinon 8mm FE | EF 75-300 non-USM III | SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 | Tamron 70-210 | 430EX II | Kenko 2x MC4 and 1.4x Pro300DGX TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SouthFlorida_Tron
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
     
Sep 29, 2011 12:18 |  #13

Ah the all not needed guilt trip! lol no really, i know...totally wrong just saying though, an option....


< Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
My Flickr (external link)
My "Nano-Reef" Aquarium Thread (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SouthFlorida_Tron
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
596 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
     
Sep 29, 2011 12:19 |  #14

my thing is the "seller" is IMO playing dumb and has no recolection of the lens being loose around the focus ring, said he never noticed it cuz he always AF...but dude, the thing wiggles lol


< Nikon D7100 -- AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED -- AF-S DX NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8G >
My Flickr (external link)
My "Nano-Reef" Aquarium Thread (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shinksma
Senior Member
Avatar
710 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Sep 29, 2011 12:21 |  #15

But how much does it "wiggle"? If someone had bought my 100 macro from me yesterday and asked about focus ring wiggle, I would have also played dumb, because I didn't notice until you brought it up. But maybe yours is much worse. As i said, go check out a new copy, see how it feels.

shinksma


5DII | T3i | EF 17-40 L | EF 24-105 L | EF 24 1.4 L II | EF 28 1.8 | EF 85 1.8 | EF 70-200 2.8 L IS II | EF 100-400 L | EF-S 15-85 IS USM | EF-S 17-55 2.8 IS USM | EF-S 10-22 USM | EF 100 2.8 Macro USM | EF-S 18-55 IS | EF 35-80 III | EF-S 55-250 IS | Rokinon 8mm FE | EF 75-300 non-USM III | SMC Takumar 50mm f/1.4 | Tamron 70-210 | 430EX II | Kenko 2x MC4 and 1.4x Pro300DGX TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,631 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Is my macro lens ok?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1187 guests, 187 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.