Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Oct 2011 (Saturday) 11:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to speed up postprocessing

 
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Oct 01, 2011 11:43 |  #1

Hi everyone, lately I have a lot of wedding to do and to edit gazillion pics. Sometimes I am pulling my hair out doe to no time or not enough time to post process, it got so bad than I give some of my weddings to be edited and the edit from someone else is not really my style,(to self critical). I am going to list here what I usually use, some of you I know are better experts in post processing than me so that why I am asking for your opinion on speeding my post processing and editing technique.

I am using photoshop batch processing for sharpening, flattening, etc. (actions) but have to save the pics one by one :( I know..... not so fast, could not figure out auto safe!

If I use lightroom then not so many options on editing so i am sticking with photoshop, then on top of that still edit some more pics with photoshop individuality, black/white,sepia, color removal, acne-tanning line removal, other effect etc.....

I want to give the couples best editing but sometimes I am asking my self am I doint to much?

Thanks for any input, critique and suggestions


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
AltgnJoey
Senior Member
Avatar
885 posts
Likes: 128
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 01, 2011 11:58 |  #2

Why wouldn't you be using lightroom, if you use lightroom to it's fullest potential the pp process is very organized and alot quicker then goin through one photo at a time in photoshop.


https://500px.com/jose​ph-kurtz (external link)
www.josephkurtzphotogr​aphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
Oct 01, 2011 12:26 |  #3

To speed up processing I recommend using Lightroom to its fullest potential. LR is designed to increase productivity and speed up your workflow.
If LR doesn't do enough for you then I recommend utilizing Photoshop and the included Adobe Bridge, and Adobe Camera Raw(ACR) to their fullest potential. You can batch process multiple files in ACR just as you can in LR.
Either or should do it for you unless for some reason you have to do a lot of corrections and manipulation to your photos.
Both ACR and LR have a lot of great presets, or you can create your own to apply to a batch of image files.
Generally speaking, the only time you should proceed into PS is when it is an absolutely must for pixel level or layered processing of something that requires individual attention..

Regardless of which application you use, When it comes to individual things such as spot removal, I.e. Acne, then you have no choice but to attack those individually. However, that too can still be done in Lightroom or ACR with the spot removal or adjustment brush.

Hopefully the goal is, Less pp = better picture.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
Oct 01, 2011 12:31 |  #4

I use a combo of LR's custom presets (like actions in PS) and action in PS themselves. It's sped up my post work tremendously. I created an action to save files as well so all in all, I've cut my editing easily in half while maintaining a consistent feel across the whole session/wedding


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Oct 01, 2011 14:10 |  #5

tkerr wrote in post #13191525 (external link)
To speed up processing I recommend using Lightroom to its fullest potential. LR is designed to increase productivity and speed up your workflow.
If LR doesn't do enough for you then I recommend utilizing Photoshop and the included Adobe Bridge, and Adobe Camera Raw(ACR) to their fullest potential. You can batch process multiple files in ACR just as you can in LR.
Either or should do it for you unless for some reason you have to do a lot of corrections and manipulation to your photos.
Both ACR and LR have a lot of great presets, or you can create your own to apply to a batch of image files.
Generally speaking, the only time you should proceed into PS is when it is an absolutely must for pixel level or layered processing of something that requires individual attention..

Regardless of which application you use, When it comes to individual things such as spot removal, I.e. Acne, then you have no choice but to attack those individually. However, that too can still be done in Lightroom or ACR with the spot removal or adjustment brush.

Hopefully the goal is, Less pp = better picture.

Thanks, i am using pretty much what you just said, maybe I should switch back to lightroom for batch processing and photoshop for spots etc. I was thinking there might be a faster solution :) ... ?


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Oct 01, 2011 14:12 as a reply to  @ Arman's Photography's post |  #6

Is there auto save if you use photoshop for batch prosess? You know batch/action/autosave as copy to designated file folder?


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Oct 01, 2011 14:58 |  #7

If you can batch process you can auto convert to JPEG in Adobe Bridge (via Photoshop) or also auto save another JPEG from a JPEG, just record the actions you want.

-> If you use Photoshop, use Bridge for RAW editing (pretty much the same as Lightroom with minor differences - e.g. Bridge writes an .xmp file per RAW by deafult), then either open in Photoshop and finish the job, or just hit the batch process task that will do all for you.
(At least on Windows)

I'm sure Lightroom has a similar batch process option. In Bridge you can also copy settings from one RAW to one or 10, or 1000 other...


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DetlevCM
Goldmember
Avatar
3,431 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 20
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Europe
     
Oct 01, 2011 14:59 |  #8

Armans Photography wrote in post #13191792 (external link)
=Arman's Photography;13191792]T​hanks, i am using pretty much what you just said, maybe I should switch back to lightroom for batch processing and photoshop for spots etc. I was thinking there might be a faster solution :) ... ?

If spots mean "sensor dust", do that in Lightroom?
You can correct them in CameraRAW - so I'm sure Lightroom can do so too.


5D MK II AF Satisfaction Poll | Reduced Kit List
A Basic Guide to Photographyexternal link | Websiteexternal link
Flickrexternal link | Artflakesexternal link | Blurbexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Oct 01, 2011 15:34 as a reply to  @ DetlevCM's post |  #9

Thanks guys:wink:


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Oct 01, 2011 16:30 |  #10

Armans Photography wrote in post #13191376 (external link)
=Arman's Photography;13191376]

I am using photoshop batch processing for sharpening, flattening, etc. (actions) but have to save the pics one by one :( I know..... not so fast, could not figure out auto safe!

Photoshop does not have an autosave function. The problem with batch processing when using the File > Automate > Batch command is that the modal dialog boxes will prompt you to save. To get around that, use the Image Processor instead to run your actions (File > Scripts > Image Processor). Or even better run the Image Processor from Adobe Bridge (Tools > Photoshop > Image Processor) and your batch processing will not be interrupted by dialog boxes.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Oct 01, 2011 22:11 |  #11

PixelMagic wrote in post #13192167 (external link)
Photoshop does not have an autosave function. The problem with batch processing when using the File > Automate > Batch command is that the modal dialog boxes will prompt you to save. To get around that, use the Image Processor instead to run your actions (File > Scripts > Image Processor). Or even better run the Image Processor from Adobe Bridge (Tools > Photoshop > Image Processor) and your batch processing will not be interrupted by dialog boxes.

Thats why I could not find auto save :), thanks for the advise I will try bridge photo processor but isn't it the same as photoshop automate/batch, same window same all? I did not try file-scripts-image processor yet I will try it out..... Thanks for the info:idea:


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 02, 2011 00:32 |  #12

Something you will want to do with the Image Processor is create an Action that does the "common tasks" but does not do a Save/Save As. You set your Save parameters in the Image Processor -- a lot like the Lightroom Export function. And, the Image Processor can be directed to run your Action. In fact, you can have Lightroom do the same thing if you save your Action as a "droplet" -- it will be viewable to an external app, and Lightroom can run it as part of the Export function.

So as usual, there are various approaches to doing a task, and Lightroom and Photoshop CSx both have some built-in tools that can make such things work quite efficiently, you just have to learn about the tools and how to use them!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stephen-shooter
Hatchling
6 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Oct 02, 2011 20:57 |  #13

Here are the nice tips on how to organize the workflow (including post-processing) for the most efficiency: http://thomashawk.com …graphy-workflow-2011.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 02, 2011 21:17 |  #14

My wedding workflow is detailed on this thread. Photoshop proper is barely used, it's almost all done in Bridge.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Oct 03, 2011 17:56 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #15

Thanks guys, awesome info, I have tried image processor in bridge and it works great , great tool, it only takes up to 26 pics at a time but it is still fast and practical.


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,838 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
How to speed up postprocessing
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1707 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.