Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 01 Oct 2011 (Saturday) 18:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help! I shoot too tight

 
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Oct 01, 2011 18:20 |  #1

... and I cut off limbs, and feet, and fingers. And I don't even realize I'm doing it until I go to look at it in post, and realize.... awww, crap.

Any tricks to help me get over this? I think it's one of my biggest weaknesses right now.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quiksquirrel
Senior Member
608 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Denmark
     
Oct 01, 2011 18:28 |  #2

Shoot wider and pay attention to your composition.
Should be simple enough.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Oct 01, 2011 18:33 |  #3

Slow down. I find things like that happen when I'm not taking enough time to really LOOK through the viewfinder.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Oct 01, 2011 18:34 |  #4

It should be simple, I agree. :(

I think I'm too focused on focus. Make sure the AF point is right on the eyes, and double-check that it's crisp, and take the shot. And then I look at it on the PC, and the face is perfectly in focus but they have no feet.


Ah, practice practice, I guess.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Oct 01, 2011 18:37 |  #5

Make yourself "box the viewfinder" and examine all four corners/edges while shooting...

Don't get "Buck Fever" and just zero in on center mass.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Oct 01, 2011 22:52 as a reply to  @ FlyingPhotog's post |  #6

I know its easy to say slow down and take your time but that really is the answer. If you were to go out for a day of shooting, lets say some of the family in the park and just some scenics, how many shots are you coming home with. Some people like to think that if they shoots lots and lots of exposures that they are getting practice. In some cases that may be the case but you are only getting practice in pressing the shutter button if you aren't learning something from each shoot. You need to mentally and purposely slow yourself down when you start to raise that camera to your face. That could be have someone with you remind you or a simple phrase you say to yourself as you start that will twig you to take care and attention. Its not about the number of exposure you can bang off in a fixed time frame.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 02, 2011 02:32 |  #7

Something to bear in mind -- sometimes a closer composition pays off. Yes, get a "visual" of a composition that you want, but then, in post-processing, finalize the visual that makes for the best image!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BaghdadFred
Senior Member
871 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Baghdad Iraq
     
Oct 02, 2011 04:39 |  #8

I end up doing some amount of cropping in about 90% of the photos I take. It's so much easier to go slightly wider than needed then just cut out the dead space in PP.

Shoot carefully and review your images. Since I am often doing Candid type photography my biggest problem is blinking, awkward posing and awkward expressions on peoples faces. There is not a lot you can do to prevent this.

I shoot a few, pause, review and possibly delete the bad shots and keep going if I don't believe I got the shot I wanted.


Fred - Photographing everyday Military life in Iraq (external link) | SmugMug (external link)
7D | C 100-400L | Σ 70-200 2.8 OS | Σ 30 1.4 | C 10-22 | Σ 8-16 | C 17-55 2.8 IS | C 28-135 IS | 580EX II | Σ 1.4x

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Oct 02, 2011 04:53 |  #9

Another reason to shoot wider and frame with a slight crop is the need to accommodate different aspect ratios.

If you always fill the 2:3 frame right to the edges, you'll probably have a really hard time making an 8x10 print which is a 4:5 aspect...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
     
Oct 02, 2011 04:59 |  #10

If you have to compose the image in such a way that a limb or part of the body gets cut off, make sure it's done in a tasteful manner, so for example you should never frame the subject in a way that the frame cuts off on a joint (knee, elbow, so on). The only exception here is the torso.

Also, why not at least show an example of what you consider "too tight"? Sometimes photographers intentionally shoot subjects with the face taking up most of the frame for effect.
As long as it's done right, there's no such thing as "too tight".


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DStanic
Cream of the Crop
6,148 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Canada
     
Oct 02, 2011 09:21 |  #11

Maybe try using live view and when you get tired of wasting time that way maybe you will look through the viewfinder more carefully. :)


Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
Canon 60D, 30D
Tamron 28-75 2.8, Tamron 17-35, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Canon 85mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Oct 02, 2011 09:26 |  #12

Kolor-Pikker wrote in post #13193931 (external link)
Also, why not at least show an example of what you consider "too tight"? Sometimes photographers intentionally shoot subjects with the face taking up most of the frame for effect.
As long as it's done right, there's no such thing as "too tight".

Here are a couple of examples from the shoot I did on Wednesday. The processing is not done yet, so no criticism on that just yet (unless you have helpful advice on making it look like a silent film).

In these two poses, I shot six or eight takes. The ones with the best facial expressions and poses have cut-off limbs.

In the first location, I was already flustered with the lighting. That back wall is SO GLOSSY that I was getting hot hot hot spots from my umbrellas' reflection, so I was not concentrating as much on the composition as the lighting.. Also, there was a little bit of clutter (props etc) out of the right of the frame, so I was trying not to get that stuff, though in retrospect it would have maybe been easier to clean up in post.


1a. Better pose but cut-off limbs. I love the perspective distortion in the pointing finger, and the stretched hat.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0163.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

1b. Slightly worse pose, worse perspective, less cut-off limbs, but I still chopped off her toes (argh)

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0168.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

The second location, I was much cooler-headed. I had practiced with the lighting a couple of days before, so I was well prepared. Still, when I get "into it" I don't pay as much attention to composition as I should, especially when we're having fun and laughing the whole time.

I haven't even begun to process these.

1a. My favorite pose from this bunch, but I cut off her toes, grrrrrrr

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0249.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

1b. My second favorite. Perspective isn't as good (I had to step left to keep the light behind his hat) and it's not quite as amusing as the moustache-twirl. By shooting loose here, I obviously have more room to crop, rotate, maybe even clean up the perspective by a couple of degrees, etc.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0240.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

I guess the lingering question was implied by Tony and Kolor-Pikker - does it negatively affect the overall image? Not counting the critics here on POTN, will anyone care that the tips of her toes are off the frame?

http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermeto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,674 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Oct 02, 2011 10:11 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

nathancarter wrote in post #13194400 (external link)
Here are a couple of examples from the shoot I did on Wednesday. The processing is not done yet, so no criticism on that just yet (unless you have helpful advice on making it look like a silent film).

In these two poses, I shot six or eight takes. The ones with the best facial expressions and poses have cut-off limbs.

In the first location, I was already flustered with the lighting. That back wall is SO GLOSSY that I was getting hot hot hot spots from my umbrellas' reflection, so I was not concentrating as much on the composition as the lighting.. Also, there was a little bit of clutter (props etc) out of the right of the frame, so I was trying not to get that stuff, though in retrospect it would have maybe been easier to clean up in post.


1a. Better pose but cut-off limbs. I love the perspective distortion in the pointing finger, and the stretched hat.


Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0163.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

1b. Slightly worse pose, worse perspective, less cut-off limbs, but I still chopped off her toes (argh)


Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0168.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

The second location, I was much cooler-headed. I had practiced with the lighting a couple of days before, so I was well prepared. Still, when I get "into it" I don't pay as much attention to composition as I should, especially when we're having fun and laughing the whole time.

I haven't even begun to process these.

1a. My favorite pose from this bunch, but I cut off her toes, grrrrrrr


Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0249.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

1b. My second favorite. Perspective isn't as good (I had to step left to keep the light behind his hat) and it's not quite as amusing as the moustache-twirl. By shooting loose here, I obviously have more room to crop, rotate, maybe even clean up the perspective by a couple of degrees, etc.


Damsel_and_Villain.201​10929.0240.jpg (external link) by nathancarter (external link), on Flickr

I guess the lingering question was implied by Tony and Kolor-Pikker - does it negatively affect the overall image? Not counting the critics here on POTN, will anyone care that the tips of her toes are off the frame?

Hmm, IMHO, yes.
Awkwardly cut off limbs could make or break otherwise properly exposed and composed shot.

Please don't take this to heart, but even if we put aside cut off limbs, the overall composition of these shots has to be worked on..


What we see depends mainly on what we look for.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Oct 02, 2011 11:05 |  #14

Hermeto wrote in post #13194524 (external link)
Please don't take this to heart, but even if we put aside cut off limbs, the overall composition of these shots has to be worked on..

Please elaborate.

"Worked on" is not really enough for me to learn from.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
Oct 02, 2011 11:38 |  #15

nathancarter wrote in post #13194665 (external link)
Please elaborate.

"Worked on" is not really enough for me to learn from.

I think he might be referring to the Rule of thirds or the Golden rules as well as the use of lines.
http://photoinf.com/ (external link)


IMHO, better to shoot too wide than too narrow.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,628 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Help! I shoot too tight
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1686 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.