... and I cut off limbs, and feet, and fingers. And I don't even realize I'm doing it until I go to look at it in post, and realize.... awww, crap.
Any tricks to help me get over this? I think it's one of my biggest weaknesses right now.
Oct 01, 2011 18:20 | #1 ... and I cut off limbs, and feet, and fingers. And I don't even realize I'm doing it until I go to look at it in post, and realize.... awww, crap. http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
quiksquirrel Senior Member 608 posts Likes: 9 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Denmark More info | Oct 01, 2011 18:28 | #2 Shoot wider and pay attention to your composition.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 01, 2011 18:33 | #3 Slow down. I find things like that happen when I'm not taking enough time to really LOOK through the viewfinder.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 01, 2011 18:34 | #4 It should be simple, I agree. http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Oct 01, 2011 18:37 | #5 Make yourself "box the viewfinder" and examine all four corners/edges while shooting... Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ssim POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005 10,884 posts Likes: 6 Joined Apr 2003 Location: southern Alberta, Canada More info | I know its easy to say slow down and take your time but that really is the answer. If you were to go out for a day of shooting, lets say some of the family in the park and just some scenics, how many shots are you coming home with. Some people like to think that if they shoots lots and lots of exposures that they are getting practice. In some cases that may be the case but you are only getting practice in pressing the shutter button if you aren't learning something from each shoot. You need to mentally and purposely slow yourself down when you start to raise that camera to your face. That could be have someone with you remind you or a simple phrase you say to yourself as you start that will twig you to take care and attention. Its not about the number of exposure you can bang off in a fixed time frame. My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Oct 02, 2011 02:32 | #7 Something to bear in mind -- sometimes a closer composition pays off. Yes, get a "visual" of a composition that you want, but then, in post-processing, finalize the visual that makes for the best image! Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BaghdadFred Senior Member 871 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Baghdad Iraq More info | Oct 02, 2011 04:39 | #8 I end up doing some amount of cropping in about 90% of the photos I take. It's so much easier to go slightly wider than needed then just cut out the dead space in PP. Fred - Photographing everyday Military life in Iraq
LOG IN TO REPLY |
FlyingPhotog Cream of the "Prop" 57,560 posts Likes: 178 Joined May 2007 Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft More info | Oct 02, 2011 04:53 | #9 Another reason to shoot wider and frame with a slight crop is the need to accommodate different aspect ratios. Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Kolor-Pikker Goldmember 2,790 posts Likes: 59 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Moscow More info | Oct 02, 2011 04:59 | #10 If you have to compose the image in such a way that a limb or part of the body gets cut off, make sure it's done in a tasteful manner, so for example you should never frame the subject in a way that the frame cuts off on a joint (knee, elbow, so on). The only exception here is the torso. 5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DStanic Cream of the Crop 6,148 posts Likes: 7 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Canada More info | Oct 02, 2011 09:21 | #11 Maybe try using live view and when you get tired of wasting time that way maybe you will look through the viewfinder more carefully. Sony A6000, 16-50PZ, 55-210, 35mm 1.8 OSS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 02, 2011 09:26 | #12 Kolor-Pikker wrote in post #13193931 Also, why not at least show an example of what you consider "too tight"? Sometimes photographers intentionally shoot subjects with the face taking up most of the frame for effect. As long as it's done right, there's no such thing as "too tight". Here are a couple of examples from the shoot I did on Wednesday. The processing is not done yet, so no criticism on that just yet (unless you have helpful advice on making it look like a silent film).
Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0163.jpg 1b. Slightly worse pose, worse perspective, less cut-off limbs, but I still chopped off her toes (argh)
Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0168.jpg The second location, I was much cooler-headed. I had practiced with the lighting a couple of days before, so I was well prepared. Still, when I get "into it" I don't pay as much attention to composition as I should, especially when we're having fun and laughing the whole time. I haven't even begun to process these. 1a. My favorite pose from this bunch, but I cut off her toes, grrrrrrr
Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0249.jpg 1b. My second favorite. Perspective isn't as good (I had to step left to keep the light behind his hat) and it's not quite as amusing as the moustache-twirl. By shooting loose here, I obviously have more room to crop, rotate, maybe even clean up the perspective by a couple of degrees, etc.
Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0240.jpg I guess the lingering question was implied by Tony and Kolor-Pikker - does it negatively affect the overall image? Not counting the critics here on POTN, will anyone care that the tips of her toes are off the frame? http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hermeto Cream of the Crop 6,674 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2005 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | Oct 02, 2011 10:11 | #13 Permanent bannathancarter wrote in post #13194400 Here are a couple of examples from the shoot I did on Wednesday. The processing is not done yet, so no criticism on that just yet (unless you have helpful advice on making it look like a silent film). In these two poses, I shot six or eight takes. The ones with the best facial expressions and poses have cut-off limbs. In the first location, I was already flustered with the lighting. That back wall is SO GLOSSY that I was getting hot hot hot spots from my umbrellas' reflection, so I was not concentrating as much on the composition as the lighting.. Also, there was a little bit of clutter (props etc) out of the right of the frame, so I was trying not to get that stuff, though in retrospect it would have maybe been easier to clean up in post. 1a. Better pose but cut-off limbs. I love the perspective distortion in the pointing finger, and the stretched hat. Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0163.jpg 1b. Slightly worse pose, worse perspective, less cut-off limbs, but I still chopped off her toes (argh) Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0168.jpg The second location, I was much cooler-headed. I had practiced with the lighting a couple of days before, so I was well prepared. Still, when I get "into it" I don't pay as much attention to composition as I should, especially when we're having fun and laughing the whole time. I haven't even begun to process these. 1a. My favorite pose from this bunch, but I cut off her toes, grrrrrrr Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0249.jpg 1b. My second favorite. Perspective isn't as good (I had to step left to keep the light behind his hat) and it's not quite as amusing as the moustache-twirl. By shooting loose here, I obviously have more room to crop, rotate, maybe even clean up the perspective by a couple of degrees, etc. Damsel_and_Villain.20110929.0240.jpg I guess the lingering question was implied by Tony and Kolor-Pikker - does it negatively affect the overall image? Not counting the critics here on POTN, will anyone care that the tips of her toes are off the frame? Hmm, IMHO, yes. What we see depends mainly on what we look for.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 02, 2011 11:05 | #14 Hermeto wrote in post #13194524 Please don't take this to heart, but even if we put aside cut off limbs, the overall composition of these shots has to be worked on.. Please elaborate. http://www.avidchick.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkerr Goldmember 3,042 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA. More info | Oct 02, 2011 11:38 | #15 nathancarter wrote in post #13194665 Please elaborate. "Worked on" is not really enough for me to learn from. I think he might be referring to the Rule of thirds or the Golden rules as well as the use of lines. Tim Kerr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1686 guests, 139 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||