Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 02 Oct 2011 (Sunday) 17:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

White Balance in camera 101

 
wallace1837
Member
139 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 02, 2011 17:48 |  #1

Hi all,
I would like to have you opinions on white balance setting in camera. My camera is a 40d, but I guess they all have a similar white balance option.

I am looking for a cheap and efficient way to do my custom white balance in camera (not at the post processing stage). So far I have two basic options.

1. Coffee filter: I take a picture through a coffee filter on the lens. I then set the custom white balance to that picture. (see http://www.flickr.com …iscuss/72157603​805698706/ (external link))

2. I take a picture of a white object (in my case it is a piece of white paper in my lens cap) and use it to set the white balance.

I found some difference of opinion on how to set the white balance. Should we take the picture in direction of what we want to take picture, or take a picture in direction of the "photographer" position in order to receive the same light as the photographed object will receive.

Let me know what work best for you,


Primes:
Bower 14mm 2.8, Takumar 28.mm 3.5, Bower 35mm 1.4, Takumar 50mm 1.4, Canon 50mm 1.8, mamiya 55mm 1.8, Samyang 85mm 1.4, Meyer-optik 135 2.8, Mamiya 135mm 2.8, Takumar 135mm 3.5, Mamiya 400mm 6.3
Zooms:
Canon 28-105mm 3.5-4.5, Canon 100-300mm 5.6L.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Edwin ­ Herdman
Senior Member
747 posts
Joined Aug 2011
     
Oct 02, 2011 18:18 |  #2

Is setting WB "to taste" out of the question, i.e. you have some professional task or you want consistency across a large group? I would get a gray card for those cases, making sure that if lighting changes I take a new shot of the gray card.

Then, in Digital Photo Pro, just click the WB eyedropper on a part of that gray card and save that as a recipe. Done.

Taking a picture of a white object won't work. You want a gray object. Keep in mind that if your gray balance photo is noisy, chroma noise might throw the values from one gray pixel to the next. Also, if the gray card isn't lit like the subject of your photo, gray values may be off again. Even lighting on the gray card is the best.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 02, 2011 18:40 |  #3

Well, hang on -- white will work as well as gray as long as the "target" is "color-neutral".

The idea is to get the scene lighting -- either the target in the scene or, as you mentioned, something like a coffee filter or an ExpoDisk that will let the scene lighting into an exposure.

Just make sure the target light fills up a good portion of your view and use it to set the Custom White Balance. Or, as was selected, you can use it in post processing, but you said you didn't want to go that route...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Oct 02, 2011 21:35 |  #4

I just shoot raw and adjust to taste in post. Nothing I shoot would be considered color critical so I really don't care if I nail it in-camera or not.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SleepingPachuco
Member
Avatar
36 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: North Hollywood, CA
     
Oct 03, 2011 01:58 |  #5

I am having an issue where whenever I do a custom white balance the color turns green...the white balance for some reason is green...

Any ideas?


60D /18-135 3.5-5.6 /Nifty Fifty /75-300 4-5.6 /Rode VideoMic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 03, 2011 02:22 |  #6

Umm, either you're getting the target way off or you need to send your camera in?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Oct 03, 2011 05:13 |  #7

SleepingPachuco wrote in post #13197443 (external link)
I am having an issue where whenever I do a custom white balance the color turns green...the white balance for some reason is green...

Any ideas?

Mine does too, but it's intentional because I use the Uni-WB custom. Green cast is an indication that no WB is being applied, that is the native color before WB because the sensor is much more sensitive to green than to red or blue. (Uni-WB is a way to trick the camera into doing a zero WB.)

Describe how you do a custom WB.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
You-by-Lou
Goldmember
Avatar
1,691 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Manhattan
     
Oct 03, 2011 05:37 |  #8

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …k_1903061_Gray_​Cards.html (external link)

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …m_White_Balance​_Lens.html (external link)

I aim towards subject


You may say I'm a Zoomer, But I'm not the only one
Canon 5D mkIII
135L my new favorite

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Oct 03, 2011 08:39 |  #9

I prefer the coffee filter method.. (Except I use the translucent white lids that fast food outlets provide with their paper drink cups :) ).. Grey cards work, (I have one of those too), but I find the 'coffee filter' is better for wide open spaces with light coming from many directions.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Oct 03, 2011 09:01 |  #10

When I did that for the first time with my 40D, I was confused, too. I thought it might have been the flourescent lighting I was trying to white balance under.

SleepingPachuco wrote in post #13197443 (external link)
I am having an issue where whenever I do a custom white balance the color turns green...the white balance for some reason is green...

Any ideas?


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Oct 03, 2011 14:05 |  #11

SleepingPachuco wrote in post #13197443 (external link)
I am having an issue where whenever I do a custom white balance the color turns green...the white balance for some reason is green...

Any ideas?

Hi,

I had this happen as well when using an ice surface to set a custom WB. I was told to shoot at 1/60th of a sec to sync with the arena lights. That worked for me - but not sure if it is applicable in your case.


TB


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
General_T
Senior Member
252 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
     
Oct 03, 2011 14:06 |  #12

tzalman wrote in post #13197685 (external link)
Mine does too, but it's intentional because I use the Uni-WB custom. Green cast is an indication that no WB is being applied, that is the native color before WB because the sensor is much more sensitive to green than to red or blue. (Uni-WB is a way to trick the camera into doing a zero WB.)

Describe how you do a custom WB.

Hi,

Why would you want to do a zero WB?


Canon 5D Mk III | 24-105 F4 L IS USM | 100 F2.8 L Macro IS USM | 70-200 MK II F2.8 L IS USM|580 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Oct 03, 2011 15:34 |  #13

General_T wrote in post #13199647 (external link)
Hi,

Why would you want to do a zero WB?

Because it gives you an unbiased histogram when used in conjunction with a neutral camera style.

An unbiased histogram allows you to be sure you are capturing the maximum dynamic range.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Oct 03, 2011 17:52 |  #14

General_T wrote in post #13199647 (external link)
Hi,

Why would you want to do a zero WB?

Because RAW is not white balanced. Moreover, when the image is white balanced during jpg construction the method used is to multiply the red and blue channels. For sunlight, shade, etc., blue is moderately boosted but red values are more than doubled. For tungsten lighting it is the opposite. If red is doubled, for instance, any original exposure value that would have been more than 128 should become more than 256, but can't do so because the limit is 255. In other words the red channel is clipped, the histogram runs off the right end and the review jpg starts blinking. But it's not real clipping, the capture exposure is fine and the WB has caused the clipping. Since I am shooting with RAW, if I know that the capture is not overexposed, I will be able to control the effect of the WB during conversion from the RAW.

The camera blindly applies WB without caring about the result; in RAW conversion I control the process. I can control it better if I have an accurate histogram of the RAW data. This is doubly important if I am placing the brightest part of the image as close as is possible to clipping, but without clipping, in order to maximize exposure in the shadow areas and thus maximize DR and minimize shadow noise.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DuBarry
Senior Member
Avatar
321 posts
Joined Sep 2011
     
Oct 03, 2011 22:21 |  #15

wallace1837 wrote in post #13195951 (external link)
Hi all,
I would like to have you opinions on white balance setting in camera. My camera is a 40d, but I guess they all have a similar white balance option.

I am looking for a cheap and efficient way to do my custom white balance in camera (not at the post processing stage). So far I have two basic options.

1. Coffee filter: I take a picture through a coffee filter on the lens. I then set the custom white balance to that picture. (see http://www.flickr.com …iscuss/72157603​805698706/ (external link))

2. I take a picture of a white object (in my case it is a piece of white paper in my lens cap) and use it to set the white balance.

I found some difference of opinion on how to set the white balance. Should we take the picture in direction of what we want to take picture, or take a picture in direction of the "photographer" position in order to receive the same light as the photographed object will receive.

Let me know what work best for you,


I take a picture of a white card/object (but large enough to fill - or nearly fill - the viewfinder) and its generally placed in the target area not pointed at the photogs position.

I have had great success with this.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,070 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
White Balance in camera 101
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1249 guests, 116 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.