Hello People,
I'm about to buy a new lens and I'm deciding between the 35mm f/1.4 or the 85mm f/1.2. I want to see you opinions on these two lenses. Thanks!!!
Soto Senior Member 872 posts Joined Dec 2005 More info | Oct 04, 2011 14:57 | #1 Hello People,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ahendarman Senior Member 851 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: SoCal More info | Oct 04, 2011 15:08 | #2 |
Citizen_Insane Senior Member 453 posts Joined Oct 2006 Location: Ames, IA More info | Oct 04, 2011 15:10 | #3 |
professoryeti Senior Member 573 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Charleston, WV More info | Oct 04, 2011 15:13 | #4 I think they're really nice lenses that are extremely fast, sharp, and capture beautiful colors. Saturnalia for all you have.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cherrymoon Senior Member 533 posts Joined Mar 2008 More info | Oct 04, 2011 15:13 | #5 2 killing lenses. But IMO the 85L is the sexiest. 5D² 40 pancake | 50/1.4 | 85L II | 135L | 16-35L IS | 24-105L | 70-200 f2.8 L IS II and a TT bike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2011 15:18 | #6 OK... thanks for the comments. I'm going to be doing a lot of food photography and some fashion. I already have the Canon 24-105mm f/4 with my 5DMKII.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yourdoinitwrong Goldmember 2,394 posts Joined Apr 2009 Location: Indiana More info | If you have the room to work I would go with the 85mm. You will have less perspective distortion than if you were shooting up close with the 35mm. I really like my 35 1.4 but I don't use it for close shots. I previously tried out the 85L and while it produces great images, the AF is a little slow. With food though I don't think that will be much of an issue. 5D4 w/BG-E20, 24-105 f/4L, 70-200 f/2.8L IS II, 35 f/1.4L, 85 f/1.8, 100 f/2.8L IS Macro, Sigma 50 f/1.4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LongDraw Member 152 posts Joined Aug 2009 More info | What about 50mm?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2011 16:00 | #9 LongDraw wrote in post #13204933 What about 50mm? That's a good one too... its $50 more and it goes to f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonK Goldmember 2,161 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2004 Location: PA USA More info | Oct 04, 2011 16:19 | #10 MFD is long on the 85. Too long for food IMHO. 7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 04, 2011 17:13 | #11 For food the 85/1.2 isn't really that great of a choice. It's expensive and has a long MFD. For the same money consider the Sigma 85/1.4 and the Canon TS-E 90 or 100 macro.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
StirFryALot Senior Member 679 posts Joined Aug 2010 Location: Berkeley, Ca More info | Oct 04, 2011 17:16 | #12 Sigma 30 and the Canon 85. Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hillavoider Member 99 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Oct 04, 2011 19:16 | #13 100mm macro L will do food and portraits, very nice lens and cheaper
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cjrpostma Member 40 posts Joined May 2011 Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan More info | I just bought the 85 1.2L II and I wasn't quite sure I would be happy with my choice. After using it for a few days, I can say it is my favorite lens. I sold my 100L IS Macro to purchase the 85L. I also own the 35 1.4L. 5DII, 35L, 85L II, 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ENto.Abyss Member 96 posts Joined Sep 2011 Location: socali More info | 35mm was my first Lens i own.. and till this day, I'm still using this lens ohhhh yeaaa!! Canon 5D Mark II & Canon 5d Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 928 guests, 150 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||