Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 07 Oct 2011 (Friday) 03:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How to remove freckles?

 
texshooter
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 07, 2011 03:43 |  #1

Any suggestions on how to remove freckles without using the healing brush or clone stamp. The kind of freckles I'm refering to are very small and light freckles, bordering on a skin pigment difference. I tried to follow the following tutorial with unsatisfactory results. There has to be a way to get the freckled skin the same tone as the surrounding skin without lightening both the freckles and the surrounding skin

http://photoshoptutori​als.ws …hing/remove-freckles.html (external link)

Here is the image I'm trying to fix. Note to moderator: I downloaded this iimage from a site I have paid a subscription for the priviledge of editing. I'm assuming it's ok to post it here. Let me know if not. I cropped out the face.

Also, I don't want to blur the skin, just remove the darker spottled pigmentation. And I don't want to lighten the skin between the freckles. I was able to successfully remove the redness from the skin, but now the opacity needs evened out.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 07, 2011 04:49 |  #2

With a cheese grater. Don't forget to factor in recovery time.

Generally if someone has freckles you shouldn't remove them without asking them first. Especially if you use the cheese grater method. Doing it in photoshop i'd use the standard spot removal tools.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 07, 2011 15:09 |  #3

Hasty demo of concept, on her left arm...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


Blur, Average

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 07, 2011 16:56 as a reply to  @ Wilt's post |  #4

I'm not liking the blur effect. There seems to be a hypocrisy with Photoshop. When I wanted to remove the redness in the skin all I had to do wash create a new layer, switch to HUE blend mode, eyedrop sample the good skin, and Whala.

But if I want to change the opacity (the pigmented spots), the only technique I can find is one that requires bluring the skin, which makes it look fake.

Here's my theory of how Photoshop should do it. Maybe I'm naive but...

Step one: I eyedrop sample a freckle
Step two: I eyedrop the good skin
Step three: I do some sort of blend mode or whatever to tell PS to make sample one the same as sample two. I may may want to slide the opacity bar so as not to remove the freckles completely. What should happen is that the freckles would lighten but the surrounding skin would stay the same.

I tried this technique but all it did was lighten the good skin and left the freckles untouched... http://www.free-photoshop-video-tutorials.com …ines-from-your-photos.asp (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
23,005 posts
Gallery: 457 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 15602
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU
     
Oct 07, 2011 18:39 |  #5

I have no experience with skin and don't know if there's a way to completely get rid of all the freckles, but how about reducing them a bit, would that do? I took the image, selected the skin, painted in the skin colour (just sampled a spot that looked right), chose luminosity as blend mode, reduced opacity to 50%, used a mask to reduce the effect where it was possible and came up with this. A quick and dirty job mind you. Could be that it completely sucks though... :rolleyes:


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1660
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Oct 07, 2011 19:26 |  #6

Paint Shop Pro X2...Skin Smoothing set to 50, then Makeover Tool Blemish Fixer to get rid of the bolder freckles...


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

freckles b (external link) by Ed Durbin (Katodog) (external link), on Flickr

If it were me I'd brighten the shot just a bit, people look healthier with a slightly bright tone...


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

freckles a (external link) by Ed Durbin (Katodog) (external link), on Flickr

And a "trick" you can use to smooth skin is noise reduction. NoiseWare set to "Default" does a good job of smoothing skin without losing detail.

The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
23,005 posts
Gallery: 457 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 15602
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU
     
Oct 07, 2011 19:32 |  #7

Wow, Ed, those look just great. My effort absolutely does suck in comparison! :)


Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
katodog
Goldmember
Avatar
4,325 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 1660
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Carol Stream, Illinois
     
Oct 07, 2011 19:45 |  #8

Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #13219355 (external link)
Wow, Ed, those look just great. My effort absolutely does suck in comparison! :)


Never say "suck" unless you're drinking a milkshake. I've found in photography that there's really no such thing as "suck", unless there is a true lack of technical skill or artistic impression. To me it all boils down to experience, and if you don't spend time diddling around with people's skin then you might not have the best editing skills for skin. It's not because you "suck", it's because you don't have the experience.


Huge difference between "suck" and experience.


The only stupid question is the one that goes unasked - Photographers shoot to thrill, not to kill
My Gear- Flickr (external link) - Facebook (external link) - Smoke Photography - - Sound-Activated Paint

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Levina ­ de ­ Ruijter
I'm a bloody goody two-shoes!
Avatar
23,005 posts
Gallery: 457 photos
Best ofs: 12
Likes: 15602
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU
     
Oct 07, 2011 19:52 |  #9

Well, you have a point there in that no, I have no experience whatsoever with people's skin (I'm a bird photographer). But it is exactly because this is the case that my effort sucks! :mrgreen:


Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=19371752
Please QUOTE the comment to which you are responding!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rbrogan
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Oct 2010
     
Oct 07, 2011 23:41 as a reply to  @ Levina de Ruijter's post |  #10

I would suggest staying out of the sun......




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 08, 2011 04:33 |  #11

If you want to remove them, clone them out. I'd suggest reading up on frequency separation: https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=10859189#po​st10859189

http://abduzeedo.com/p​erfect-lie-photoshop-2 (external link)


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 09, 2011 04:10 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #12

Thanx ill give those techniques a try. Btw, I found this blog that says the only way to professionally retouch skin is by painstakingly dodging and burning every pixel which can take hours per face.

http://www.dmd-digital-retouching.com …stakes-how-to-avoid-them/ (external link)


I don't doubt what he says since his portfolio is impressive, but I want to STRESS again my utter confusion why there is no plug in that automates his technique. Am I to believe that thousands of fashion photographers sit at their computer all day dodging pixels at 200% Zoom? The science of blending pixel tonality should not be quantum physics. Why no entrepreneur has not programmed a tool for this leaves me scratching my head.

I guess I'll have to wait for CS10.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Oct 09, 2011 04:21 |  #13

Hey, well you have to poney up and pay those software geeks!

Nik has a nice variety of tools! for a price...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Miki ­ G
Goldmember
1,179 posts
Likes: 401
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Ireland
     
Oct 09, 2011 05:11 |  #14

Why would you want to get rid of freckles? Personally,I prefer to look at natural looking people not a photoshopped unreal version.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
texshooter
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
652 posts
Likes: 26
Joined Jun 2009
     
Oct 09, 2011 05:42 as a reply to  @ Miki G's post |  #15

The kind of freckles I'm refering to is freckles combined with sun damaged skin. The freckles are so small that the skin takes on a hyperpigmented look. Freckles are easy to remove with a healing brush. The image i posted is probably not high res enough to show the difference but there is a difference and so the traditional healing brush technique is just not useful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

13,729 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
How to remove freckles?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1032 guests, 109 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.