Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 14 Oct 2011 (Friday) 07:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Best NON-video Canon DSLR?

 
J.Doe
Member
Avatar
183 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Oct 14, 2011 07:16 |  #1

...except the EOS-1 line of products?
I really don't need the video feature.
Crop or FF,it doesn't matter....it just has to be a PHOTOGRAPHY tool.
Also,pros and cons of your option(s) are welcome!

(P.S. This thread isn't meant to be at all a reaction of a POTN fellow who posted an somewhat opposed theme a few hours ago,therefore take it "as is".Thank you.)


60D,MKIIn,Ds MKIII __EF 50 f/1.4,EF 100 f/2.8 macro,EF 135 f/2.0L,EF 16-35 f/2.8 L II,Tamron 28-75 f/2.8,EF 70-200 f/2.8L,Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 VC USD ,EF 2xII TC__Marumi clear glass,UV,ND & CPL__ Kata bags__Speedlite 580EX & Metz 58 AF-2 w/Eneloops__ Sandisk __Vanguard Alta Pro 263AT & TRACKER AP-364 w/SBH-300's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
va_rider
Goldmember
Avatar
2,378 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 14
Joined Nov 2009
Location: Staunton, VA
     
Oct 14, 2011 07:17 |  #2

best for what?


Canon 5dmkIII, Sigma 15mm f/2.8FE; 35mm f/1.4; Canon EF70-200 f/2.8L IS II; --- YN560 x 7
I'm not a professional photographer, and I don't want to be.
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johneo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,428 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2003
Location: North Kingstown, RI
     
Oct 14, 2011 07:30 |  #3

Personally ... I like my 5DMKII and the 7D. Both are NON video dSLR's until you turn on the video. You don't have to use the video!

I seldom use the video but the few times I have it came in handy and the other 99.9% of the time they both are great digital SLR's


2 - 5DMKII's, Powershot SX 150 IS
7D, 5D, IR/5D, 10D, IR/10D, Elan 7NE
17-40 L, 24-70 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 100-400 L IS,
TS-E 24 f/3.5 L, 28-135 IS (x2), 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8 550EX, 430EX
40mm pancake

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J.Doe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
183 posts
Joined Mar 2011
     
Oct 14, 2011 07:40 |  #4

va_rider wrote in post #13249561 (external link)
best for what?

Your suggestions for what seems like more than one option...please? ;)


60D,MKIIn,Ds MKIII __EF 50 f/1.4,EF 100 f/2.8 macro,EF 135 f/2.0L,EF 16-35 f/2.8 L II,Tamron 28-75 f/2.8,EF 70-200 f/2.8L,Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 VC USD ,EF 2xII TC__Marumi clear glass,UV,ND & CPL__ Kata bags__Speedlite 580EX & Metz 58 AF-2 w/Eneloops__ Sandisk __Vanguard Alta Pro 263AT & TRACKER AP-364 w/SBH-300's

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VTK
Junior Member
Avatar
26 posts
Joined Aug 2011
Location: South Burlington, Vermont
     
Oct 14, 2011 08:41 |  #5

va_rider wrote in post #13249561 (external link)
best for what?

+1 For shooting static image or sports event? Low light or well lit? In terms of ruggedness? Water resistance? ......




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Oct 14, 2011 08:46 |  #6

By rejecting video you're also rejecting some very good still cameras. The best cameras prior to video integration would probably be the 5D classic or the 50D (excluding the 1 series).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
Oct 14, 2011 09:20 |  #7

The problem with forums like these is, it can be difficult sifting out the BS to end up with just the good advise.

Here's a hint though: anytime you see comments to the affect:

- The inclusion of video degrades the still photographic capabilities of a camera.
- The video features add to the price of the still camera
- A professional grade DSLR does not include video

Please understand that those comments are misguided. The Canon DSLRs are designed first and foremost to be still cameras. By including photographic features like: an LCD Display and Live View, there were only three hardware changes (that I can think of) that were required to support video: an additional switch that changes the use of the live view on/off switch to be a video on/of switch, a microphone and an external mic jack; everything else is software. The inclusion of those features probably adds $5 to the cost of the camera (if that much).

If you don't like video in your camera, don't use it; but it is simply not an issue unless you make it one.


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9562
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Oct 14, 2011 10:58 |  #8

hairy_moth wrote in post #13249963 (external link)
If you don't like video in your camera, don't use it; but it is simply not an issue unless you make it one.

^^^ that :)


>> Flickr << (external link)


>> Instagram<< (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Oct 14, 2011 11:00 |  #9

hairy_moth wrote in post #13249963 (external link)
The problem with forums like these is, it can be difficult sifting out the BS to end up with just the good advise.

Here's a hint though: anytime you see comments to the effect:

- The inclusion of video degrades the still photographic capabilities of a camera.
- The video features add to the price of the still camera
- A professional grade DSLR does not include video

Please understand that those comments are misguided. The Canon DSLRs are designed first and foremost to be still cameras. By including photographic features like: an LCD Display and Live View, there were only three hardware changes (that I can think of) that were required to support video: an additional switch that changes the use of the live view on/off switch to be a video on/of switch, a microphone and an external mic jack; everything else is software. The inclusion of those features probably add $5 to the cost of the camera (if that much).

If you don't like video in your camera, don't use it; but it is simply not an issue unless you make it one.

Well said. Video is here to stay. It is just another feature. If its a feature you don't need, don't use it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Oct 14, 2011 11:40 |  #10

On my 60D the video is actually hard to turn on. I have to hold down the dial lock and turn literally 10-15 dial positions to the video icon. It's past ALL the little scene modes like beach and night portrait. You have to really want to use video. It gets in my way about as much as having the "portrait" dial setting that I have never used.

I think the best bodies right now for the money all include video. T2i, 60D, 7D. Well, maybe the 5D classic could be on that list, so I guess that's the best non-video body. I don't see a lot of reason to get a 50D with how far the 60D prices have dropped, and the T2i and T3 are barely any more money than used older rebels.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Oct 14, 2011 16:40 |  #11

hairy_moth wrote in post #13249963 (external link)
The problem with forums like these is, it can be difficult sifting out the BS to end up with just the good advise.

Here's a hint though: anytime you see comments to the affect:

- The inclusion of video degrades the still photographic capabilities of a camera.
- The video features add to the price of the still camera
- A professional grade DSLR does not include video

Please understand that those comments are misguided. The Canon DSLRs are designed first and foremost to be still cameras. By including photographic features like: an LCD Display and Live View, there were only three hardware changes (that I can think of) that were required to support video: an additional switch that changes the use of the live view on/off switch to be a video on/of switch, a microphone and an external mic jack; everything else is software. The inclusion of those features probably adds $5 to the cost of the camera (if that much).

If you don't like video in your camera, don't use it; but it is simply not an issue unless you make it one.

Perfectly stated sir.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Oct 15, 2011 05:08 |  #12

J.Doe wrote in post #13249560 (external link)
...except the EOS-1 line of products?
I really don't need the video feature.
Crop or FF,it doesn't matter....it just has to be a PHOTOGRAPHY tool.

Get a 7D and put a blob of superglue on the video switch.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
Oct 15, 2011 08:20 |  #13

hollis_f wrote in post #13253493 (external link)
Get a 7D and put a blob of superglue on the video switch.

Good idea. The OP probably doesn't want LiveView either. Since 7D video switch is integrated with the LiveView switch, you could kill two birds with one drop of glue. ;)


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gvg45
Senior Member
534 posts
Likes: 617
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
     
Oct 15, 2011 08:27 as a reply to  @ hollis_f's post |  #14

Some very good points about video have been suggested. But given that...

Not knowing what you shoot (sports, portraits, landscape, etc) & not knowing a budget, I would to recommend the 5D classic.

Its named "classic" for a reason. IMO, the image quality it produces still rivals all the new cameras out today. For the price, it's one of the best cameras you can buy. Only downfall would be that you need to buy it used. Do some research on the body about possible screen issues as well as recalls before making your purchase so you are aware and can make an informed buying decision.


~Greg

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nobodyspecial
Member
180 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
     
Oct 15, 2011 13:07 |  #15

J.Doe wrote in post #13249560 (external link)
...except the EOS-1 line of products?
I really don't need the video feature.
Crop or FF,it doesn't matter....it just has to be a PHOTOGRAPHY tool.
Also,pros and cons of your option(s) are welcome!

The 5Dmk1, 40D for the XXD line, Rebel XTi for the rebel line are the last cameras made by Canon that do not have a video feature, I think.

Is there a reason why you are looking for a camera that does not have the video option?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,750 views & 0 likes for this thread, 23 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Best NON-video Canon DSLR?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
974 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.