Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Oct 2011 (Saturday) 07:35
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dreaded Err 06 sensor cleaning

 
nmc0553
Hatchling
1 post
Joined Mar 2009
     
Oct 15, 2011 07:35 |  #1

My 50D is now getting the 06 error message. I can use my camera temporarily until I can get it to a service centre by disabling auto sensor cleaning. Is there any seriopus downside to doing this?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gvg45
Senior Member
534 posts
Likes: 617
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Los Angeles, Ca.
     
Oct 15, 2011 08:11 |  #2

Other than dust that may get on the sensor there is no downside to disabling the auto cleaning feature. When you send the camera in to get repaired, just request a sensor cleaning as well.

I turn off my auto cleaning feature and manually do it when I feel necessary.


~Greg

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave ­ kadolph
"Fix the cigarette lighter"
Avatar
6,140 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Mar 2007
Location: West Michigan--166.33 miles to the Cook County courthouse
     
Oct 15, 2011 14:06 as a reply to  @ gvg45's post |  #3

I've got a 40D I've been using with the sensor cleaning disabled for several years.

Given the value of the body and the cost of repair--just learn to clean it yourself and forget about fixing it IMHO.


Middle age is when you can finally afford the things that a young man could truly enjoy.
Tools of the trade

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jporter12
Member
213 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Johnstown, Oiho
     
Feb 17, 2012 20:31 |  #4

Reviving an old thread...

I just got my 40D back from service, $209 plus taxes and shipping later for their "flat rate repair", I put a battery in it and got this dreaded err 06. The battery is low, so I'm hoping that could be it. If not, I guess it's going back to them right away. Unfortunately, all of my batteries are discharged, so I have to wait for one to charge! :lol:


40D
Canon 50 f1.8 I, EF-S 17-85 f4.0-5.6 IS
Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX DG APO, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX APO, Sigma 1.4x EX DG APO TC
Perpetual newbie!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SHR202
Member
41 posts
Joined May 2015
     
Jun 08, 2016 04:30 |  #5

Re-reviving an old thread.
Got my err 06 sensor cleaning last week.
I've had my 450D(Xsi) for 6 years, nada. A year+ on my 7D Mark II and it happens.
I've sent it to a service center and they've replied they have to take the whole camera apart in order to replace the Integration Cleaning mechanism.
Question is, would you have fixed it or not?
The camera is under warranty and will be fixed at no cost.
I'm just worried of putting a healthy person into a sick bed. The camera was never opened since it was produced in Japan and will all of its weather sealed rubbers/gaskets I'm just worried that as much proficient as the lab people may be, there is still a chance they might do more damage than good.
But I'm under warranty...:-(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jun 08, 2016 14:08 |  #6

I think you're right to be worried and IMO your concern is genuine. However since the camera is under warranty, I think you did the right thing having it repaired. Test it thoroughly when you get it back and if anything appears to be amiss, send it back immediately.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jun 08, 2016 14:22 |  #7

If under warranty, absolutely get it repaired. The camera will work fine without it but you might have to clean it more often but why put up with it if Canon will fix at their cost.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SHR202
Member
41 posts
Joined May 2015
     
Jun 09, 2016 09:22 |  #8

Thanks for the advice!
I'm just worried since "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Would you open up your car's engine for a small-ish problem that does not affect your car behavior? I'm not sure.
I'm worried they might end up doing some damage to an important part, say the sensor, and, although covered by warranty, I'll be the one testing the camera and sending it to the Service Center back and forth.
Since the problem is with a feature that is not that important (or is it?) I'm not sure it is worth the hassle, albeit being "free".




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,734 posts
Likes: 4067
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Post edited over 7 years ago by gjl711.
     
Jun 09, 2016 09:41 |  #9

SHR202 wrote in post #18033978 (external link)
Thanks for the advice!
I'm just worried since "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Would you open up your car's engine for a small-ish problem that does not affect your car behavior? I'm not sure.
I'm worried they might end up doing some damage to an important part, say the sensor, and, although covered by warranty, I'll be the one testing the camera and sending it to the Service Center back and forth.
Since the problem is with a feature that is not that important (or is it?) I'm not sure it is worth the hassle, albeit being "free".

That is a risk for sure and only you can make the determination if it a big enough one to take. BTW, there are a couple of Err06 threads at present and it seems that the fix is to replace the entire shutter assembly.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SHR202
Member
41 posts
Joined May 2015
     
Jun 11, 2016 06:06 |  #10

gjl711 wrote in post #18033999 (external link)
That is a risk for sure and only you can make the determination if it a big enough one to take. BTW, there are a couple of Err06 threads at present and it seems that the fix is to replace the entire shutter assembly.

Damn! If that's the case the scale is tiling towards not repairing it (for now). Thanks for the info!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,120 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Jun 11, 2016 11:44 |  #11

SHR202 wrote in post #18033978 (external link)
Thanks for the advice!
I'm just worried since "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". Would you open up your car's engine for a small-ish problem that does not affect your car behavior? I'm not sure. YES I WOULD! It is broken though isn't it.
I'm worried they might end up doing some damage to an important part, say the sensor, and, although covered by warranty, I'll be the one testing the camera and sending it to the Service Center back and forth.
Since the problem is with a feature that is not that important (or is it?) I'm not sure it is worth the hassle, albeit being "free".

Yes if there was a problem and it was under warranty of course I would get it fixed. If the sensor cleaning function isn't working it is broke. I expect Canon staff to be competent enough to carry out a job, and ensure that all relevant areas of function have been tested for correct function before dispatch back to the customer.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Jun 11, 2016 13:44 |  #12

Hey, Alan I've got some great ocean-front property in Kansas that I'm sure that you'd be interested in.:-P


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnB57
Goldmember
1,511 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Holmfirth, Yorkshire, England
     
Jun 11, 2016 14:59 |  #13

rrblint wrote in post #18036209 (external link)
Hey, Alan I've got some great ocean-front property in Kansas that I'm sure that you'd be interested in.:-P

Would that be the condo at the end of the Yellow Brick Road by any chance Toto?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,778 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
Dreaded Err 06 sensor cleaning
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1163 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.