hi,
just a quick q - should i be using both at the same time, or just the IR? i know the IR and polarizer work well together, but am not sure of whether UV and IR should be used concurrently.
thanks in advance 
saqib Goldmember 1,188 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2003 More info | May 16, 2003 23:32 | #1 hi,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | May 17, 2003 18:05 | #2 saqib wrote: hi, just a quick q - should i be using both at the same time, or just the IR? i know the IR and polarizer work well together, but am not sure of whether UV and IR should be used concurrently. thanks in advance ![]() The UV is usually used as a lens protector so it is usually kept on no matter what filter you use. On top of that, since the UV and the IR filters works on opposite ends of the color spectrum, using them together shouldn't cause any problems. (Actually the IR filter eliminates all colors except for "colors" in the IR portions of the spectrum. That means that the UV filter is superfluous and not really required. But it won't hurt to keep it on.) ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CowboyPoetWannabe Member 175 posts Joined Apr 2003 More info | May 17, 2003 19:22 | #3 pacace wrote: (Actually the IR filter eliminates all colors except for "colors" in the IR portions of the spectrum. That means that the UV filter is superfluous and not really required. But it won't hurt to keep it on.) Agreed. But what about lower light transmission due to two filters, and which should be closest to camera. Any thoughts?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PacAce Cream of the Crop 26,900 posts Likes: 40 Joined Feb 2003 Location: Keystone State, USA More info | May 17, 2003 22:35 | #4 CowboyPoetWannabe wrote: pacace wrote: (Actually the IR filter eliminates all colors except for "colors" in the IR portions of the spectrum. That means that the UV filter is superfluous and not really required. But it won't hurt to keep it on.) Agreed. But what about lower light transmission due to two filters, and which should be closest to camera. Any thoughts? Cowboy, for most practical purposes, the light loss should be negligible, assuming one is using multicoated filters. ...Leo
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 18, 2003 08:54 | #5 thanks for the info.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Paula Mostly Lurking 15 posts Joined May 2003 More info | May 25, 2003 02:01 | #6 Please, would someone give me the url of a place where I can buy a IR filter for my G3? Thanks,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 25, 2003 06:38 | #7 i got mine from www.lensmateonline.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lowtech Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined May 2003 More info | May 25, 2003 18:20 | #8 saqib wrote: i got mine from www.lensmateonline.com thanks ![]() I have just purchased a G3 - a wonderful camera! Could you please help me to understand what adaptors, etc. I would need to attach a UV filter to it? I like that filter for protection. I am bewildered by all the choices on lensmateonline... still kind of in the slr, film camera mode...!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 25, 2003 20:34 | #9 hi lowtech,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 502 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||